Category Archives: Uncategorized

HOW SHARIA LAW VIOLATES EVERYTHING OUR COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON!!!

Loving our neighbors does not mean compromising truth.

From the moment I first studied the United States Constitution through the lens of scripture, I’ve been struck by how carefully our founders embedded God-given liberty into the fabric of our nation. Freedom of conscience, equality before God, and protection from government overreach are not just political ideas; they are biblical principles.

The more I study, the clearer it becomes that Islamic systems like sharia law, enforced as government policy abroad, stand in sharp contrast to both the freedoms our Constitution guarantees and the liberties scripture upholds.

Christians must be informed, discerning, and proactive in defending freedoms that allow people to come to God freely.

Sharia law, when enforced as government policy, conflicts with constitutional freedom and biblical principles of liberty, including protections for personal conscience, speech, and moral choice.

Sharia law vs. constitutional liberty

Sharia law is a system derived from Islamic religious texts, guiding personal conduct and societal governance.

In countries where it is enforced, it often dictates punishments, civil law, and social norms based on religious authority rather than individual liberty. This approach contrasts sharply with the U.S. Constitution, which separates church and state, ensuring that government does not dictate religious belief or practice.

Scripture emphasizes the importance of freedom in Christ. Galatians 5:1 reminds us, “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.” The Constitution mirrors this principle, protecting Americans from coercion in matters of conscience, ensuring that individuals may follow God freely without fear of government reprisal.

Real-world examples of sharia governance

When we examine Muslim nations governed by sharia-based systems, the consequences for personal freedom are clear.

In countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan, civil and criminal codes often derive directly from religious texts. These laws enforce strict moral codes, restrict freedom of speech, and impose severe punishments on offenses such as theft, adultery, or apostasy.

Punishments include public lashings, stonings, and even amputations for certain crimes. LGBTQ individuals face particularly harsh treatment, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, or death. Women’s rights and freedom of expression are often restricted as well.

These policies illustrate a system in which government enforces religious conformity, which directly conflicts with the freedom of conscience guaranteed by the Constitution. The U.S. founders recognized that human governments are fallible; they designed laws to protect liberty and allow people to make moral and spiritual choices voluntarily rather than under coercion.

The biblical perspective on liberty and government

Scripture provides a firm framework for understanding liberty. Romans 13:1-4 teaches that governments are instituted to punish wrongdoers and maintain order, but within limits. Civil authority is meant to restrain evil while upholding justice, not to enforce religious orthodoxy.

John 8:32 reminds us, “Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” True freedom, in both spiritual and civil contexts, comes from the ability to choose God and live according to His moral order voluntarily.

The Constitution’s protections for freedom of religion, speech, and equal protection under the law reflect these same biblical principles. They ensure that no one is coerced into adherence to a particular religious code, preserving liberty and human dignity.

Sharia-based governance, when implemented as law, replaces personal conscience with mandatory religious observance, undermining the freedoms that God and the founders intended.

How Christians should respond

Loving our neighbors does not mean ignoring the truth about systems of governance. But discernment calls us to distinguish between individuals and systems of law that impose religious authority on entire societies.

Christians are called to defend freedom and truth, speaking boldly yet compassionately.

Understanding the differences between sharia-based governance and constitutional liberty is not purely academic; it’s practical. Nations that merge religion and state often face suppression of speech, persecution of minorities, and human rights violations. Christians must be informed, discerning, and proactive in defending freedoms that allow people to come to God freely.

Practical engagement may include:

Praying for wisdom to navigate cultural and political issues.
Educating others about the value of freedom of conscience.
Participating in civic discourse in ways that honor God while upholding liberty.

Sharia law and the protection of minorities

One area that starkly highlights the contrast is treatment of LGBTQ individuals. In sharia-governed regions, homosexuality is often criminalized, with penalties ranging from imprisonment to corporal punishment, even death. Theft or other criminal offenses can result in amputations, and adultery may be punished by stoning.

Christians are charged to uphold liberty, educate themselves on systems that restrict freedom, and advocate for policies that reflect God’s justice while protecting human conscience.

These practices illustrate the deep conflict between enforced religious law and personal freedom, especially for vulnerable minorities.

In contrast, the U.S. Constitution protects all citizens, ensuring legal equality, freedom of conscience, and due process. The biblical principle that every person is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) supports the need to defend dignity and liberty for all.

Historical lessons and modern implications

History demonstrates that societies enforcing religious law as government policy often struggle with oppression and instability. By embedding freedom and separation of powers, the U.S. Constitution creates space for citizens to practice faith voluntarily, without fear of legal coercion.

As Christians, we can see how these principles align with biblical teaching and recognize why coercive religious legal systems are incompatible with God’s design for human freedom.

Standing for freedom with compassion

Understanding these contrasts calls us to vigilance, prayer, and action. Christians are charged to uphold liberty, educate themselves on systems that restrict freedom, and advocate for policies that reflect God’s justice while protecting human conscience.

Loving our neighbors does not mean compromising truth; it means defending freedom in a way that is rooted in Christ’s example of compassion and moral clarity.

By examining Islam as a governance system, we see clearly the importance of constitutional and biblical liberty. Freedom of conscience, protection of minorities, and the ability to choose God freely are not negotiable — they are foundational to both faith and the American experiment.

Standing for these freedoms is an act of love, truth, and obedience to God.

This article is adapted from an essay originally published at Arch Kennedy’s blog.

GLUTEN, THE “MANUFACTURED” FEAR ALLERGY THAT PEOPLE THINK THEY HAVE

Study Shows Vast Majority Who Think They Have Gluten Issues Really Don’t

For over a decade, gluten has been the bogeyman of modern diets — blamed for everything from fatigue to brain fog to mysterious stomach aches. Supermarkets built entire aisles around “gluten-free” products. Restaurants rushed to label their menus. Millions swore they felt better once they ditched bread. But new research suggests much of the panic was misplaced — and perhaps, orchestrated.

According to a new analysis published this week, the vast majority of people who believe they have gluten sensitivity actually don’t. Researchers found that only a small fraction of self-diagnosed “gluten intolerant” individuals display any measurable physiological reaction to gluten itself. For most, the culprit appears to be something else entirely — often the carbohydrates known as FODMAPs (fermentable short-chain carbohydrates) found in wheat and other foods, or even psychological conditioning from years of health scare marketing.

In short: many people have been avoiding bread for no reason.

The Gluten-Free Gold Rush

The study’s findings expose an uncomfortable truth: gluten-free living became a billion-dollar industry built on hype, not hard science. In the early 2010s, “gluten” became synonymous with poison. A handful of small studies and a wave of celebrity endorsements — from Gwyneth Paltrow to Tom Brady — helped cement the narrative that gluten caused inflammation, bloating, and mental fog.

But the science never quite caught up with the marketing. Celiac disease, a genuine autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten, affects only about 1% of the population. Yet surveys show up to 30% of Americans have tried a gluten-free diet, and nearly 10% claim to be gluten-sensitive. That’s tens of millions of people rejecting bread, pasta, and beer — often substituting heavily processed “gluten-free” alternatives that are lower in nutrients and higher in sugar.

Who benefited? Food conglomerates, health influencers, and pharmaceutical giants selling “gut repair” supplements. It was an easy narrative to sell: your body is broken, but we can fix it — for a price.

The Psychology of Manufactured Fear

Researchers now believe the “nocebo effect” — the negative counterpart of the placebo effect — plays a major role in perceived gluten intolerance. When people believe a substance will harm them, their body often produces real symptoms in response.

While about 10% of adults worldwide report bloating, fatigue or gut pain after eating foods containing gluten, only 16% to 30% of those cases show true gluten-specific reactions, the paper found.

For years, media outlets, wellness gurus, and even government-backed dietary guidelines fed this hysteria by emphasizing “food sensitivity” as a kind of catch-all diagnosis. It dovetailed perfectly with the modern health anxiety complex — a digitally fueled obsession with self-diagnosis, symptom tracking, and purity.

By the time the gluten-free movement peaked, it wasn’t just about health — it was about identity. Going gluten-free became a badge of awareness, a quiet rebellion against Big Food, and a form of social signaling. Ironically, it was Big Food itself that made it profitable. Even more ironically, the movement pushed many Americans deeper into ultraprocessed food consumption to achieve their gluten-free lifestyles.

The Real Issue May Be the System, Not the Wheat

If gluten isn’t the true villain, what is? The new study suggests many of the symptoms blamed on gluten may stem from something deeper: the industrialization of food itself.

Modern wheat is genetically modified, heavily treated with herbicides like glyphosate, and processed in ways that strip it of natural enzymes and micronutrients. Our gut health — devastated by antibiotics, processed oils, and chemical additives — is far less resilient than it was a generation ago. So while “gluten” might not be the sole trigger, the entire ecosystem around our food has changed.

In other words, people may not be reacting to gluten — they may be reacting to modern food. This is especially potent in western society’s addiction to heavily processed carbohydrates.

That’s a much harder problem to fix, because it implicates everything from corporate agriculture and seed monopolies to chemical regulators and profit-driven nutritionists. It’s easier to sell a gluten-free muffin than to reform a broken food system.

From Gluten Panic to Food Control

There’s also a darker angle here — one that fits the pattern of how health trends can be weaponized for profit and control. Just as “fat-free” and “low-sodium” campaigns of past decades laid the groundwork for processed food empires, the gluten-free wave served as a psychological and logistical trial run for centralized dietary influence.

Each new food scare — cholesterol, sugar, gluten, meat — helps train the public to comply with authority over their own choices. Every few years, a new “enemy ingredient” emerges. And every time, the same players — the food industry, the media, and government regulators — profit from the fear they spread.

Perhaps the deeper truth is this: gluten wasn’t the problem. Control was.

When you strip away the marketing, the fake science, and the fear campaigns, you’re left with something simple — human beings disconnected from the foods that once sustained them. Real bread made from stone-ground wheat, naturally fermented and free of chemical residue, doesn’t make people sick. It nourishes them. The sickness comes from a system that’s forgotten what food even means.

How Shohei Ohtani Made $102 Million in 2025

October 24, 2025 8:00am

Shohei Ohtani has been a baseball unicorn since he joined MLB in 2018. Even when he stayed off the mound in 2024, he started a new 50-50 club (home runs and steals) on his way to a third MVP by unanimous vote. Last week, his unique skill set was on display again, with three home runs at the plate and 10 strikeouts over six shutout innings on the mound, clinching the Los Angeles Dodgers’ return to the World Series.

For all his baseball talents, Ohtani might be a bigger unicorn off the field.

Ohtani is on track to earn $100 million this year through endorsements, merchandise and licensing. The tally is 10x what the No. 2 athlete in baseball, Bryce Harper, is set to make. The only other instance of a similar disparity between the top two athletes in a major sport over the past 30 years was when Usain Bolt was at his peak, making $30 million a year, 10x anyone else in track and field.

Ohtani’s off-field haul made it an easier decision to defer 97% of his record-breaking $700 million Dodgers contract without interest. He earns $2 million a year in playing salary for 10 years and then will collect $68 million annually between 2034 and 2043.

Before Ohtani, endorsement earnings for MLB players topped out at around $10 million for Derek Jeter and Ichiro Suzuki. Ohtani’s $100 million from sponsors is a threshold reached by only three athletes ever: Tiger Woods, Roger Federer and Stephen Curry, who each did it once.

Ohtani added a half-dozen companies this year to his endorsement portfolio, along with several renewals after his inaugural season with the Dodgers elevated his global standing even further. His existing major sponsors included Ito En, Kowa, Kosé and Seiko, and he added Beats, Epic Games and Secom for 2025. Ohtani is the first MLB player to be included in Epic’s Fortnite video game.

He has more than 20 brand partners, divided almost evenly between being companies headquartered in the U.S. versus Japan, but almost all the brands use him globally. New Balance is his biggest pact, where his deal is more akin to a global NBA superstar shoe deal than anything in baseball. He has his own clothing and shoe lines.

“What we’re doing with him has never been done in the game of baseball,” Nez Balelo, Ohtani’s agent at CAA, said at Sportico’s Invest West event in May. Balelo said they are strategic with Ohtani and constantly eschew deals from reputable brands. “We have to make sure we don’t overexpose him,” Balelo said. “We have to make sure we don’t put him in a situation that is too heavy of a lift.”

Ohtani ranked second among baseball’s highest-paid players this year at $102 million; Juan Soto finished on top at $129 million after signing his 15-year, $765 million free-agent deal with the New York Mets that included a $75 million signing bonus.

THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARABS AND MUSLIMS! OFTEN MISUNDERSTOOD

Arabs are an ethnic-linguistic group, while Muslims are followers of the religion of Islam. The two are not synonymous—many Arabs are not Muslim, and most Muslims are not Arab.

Here’s a breakdown to clarify the distinction:

🗣️ Arabs: An Ethno-Linguistic Identity

Definition: Arabs are people who identify with the Arabic language and cultural heritage.
Geography: Primarily from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), including countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Morocco.
Language: Arabic is their native or ancestral language.
Religion: While many Arabs are Muslim, there are also Arab Christians, Druze, and other religious minorities.

🕌 Muslims: A Religious Identity

Definition: Muslims are individuals who follow Islam, a monotheistic Abrahamic religion founded in the 7th century CE.
Global Reach: Islam is practiced worldwide, with large populations in Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Turkey, Iran, and sub-Saharan Africa—many of which are not Arab.
Diversity: Muslims come from diverse ethnic, linguistic, and cultural backgrounds. Being Muslim does not imply any specific ethnicity.

🌍 Overlap and Misconceptions

The confusion often arises because Islam originated in the Arabian Peninsula, and the Qur’an is written in Arabic.
However, only about 20% of the world’s Muslims are Arab.
Conversely, not all Arabs are Muslim—for example, Lebanon and Egypt have significant Arab Christian populations.

Understanding this distinction helps avoid stereotypes and better appreciate the rich diversity within both Arab and Muslim communities.

KRISTIE NOEM FAST TRACKED MILLIONS OF DISASTER AID FUNDS…AND QUESTION? DOES THE USA HAVE THE BEST LOOKING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, COMPARED TO THE UGLY, UGLY ONES APPOINTED BY OBAMA AND BIDEN???

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, center, speaks with Mayor Teresa Heitmann of Naples, Florida, and City Manager Gary Young on a damaged historic pier in the city on Aug. 29. Credit: Tia Dufour/Department of Homeland Security

Kristi Noem Fast-Tracked Millions in Disaster Aid to Florida Tourist Attraction After Campaign Donor Intervened

The DHS chief has been widely criticized for slowing down FEMA’s response after natural disasters. Texts and emails obtained by ProPublica point to an effective way to get help faster: have one of Noem’s big donors make the ask.

For months, the complaints have rolled in from parts of the country hit by natural disasters: The Federal Emergency Management Agency was moving far too slowly in sending aid to communities ravaged by floods and hurricanes, including in central Texas and North Carolina. Many officials were blaming Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, whose agency oversees FEMA.

“I can’t get phone calls back,” Ted Budd, the Republican senator from North Carolina, told a newspaper this month, describing his attempts to reach Noem’s office. “I can’t get them to initiate the money. It’s just a quagmire.” The delays were caused in part by a new policy announced by DHS that requires Noem’s personal sign-off on expenses over $100,000, several news outlets reported.

But records obtained by ProPublica show how one locality found a way to get FEMA aid more quickly: It asked one of Noem’s political donors for help.

The records show that Noem quickly expedited more than $11 million of federal money to rebuild a historic pier in Naples, Florida, after she was contacted by a major financial supporter last month. The pier is a tourist attraction in the wealthy Gulf Coast enclave and was badly damaged by Hurricane Ian in 2022.

Frustrated city officials had been laboring for months, without success, to get disaster assistance. But just two weeks after the donor stepped in, they were celebrating their sudden change of fortune. “We are now at warp speed with FEMA,” one city official wrote in an email. A FEMA representative wrote: “Per leadership instruction, pushing project immediately.”

Along with fast-tracking the money, Noem flew to Naples on a government plane to tour the pier herself. She then stayed for the weekend and got dinner with the donor, local cardiologist Sinan Gursoy, at the French restaurant Bleu Provence, according to records and an interview with the Naples mayor. This account is based on text messages and emails ProPublica obtained through public records requests.

Noem’s actions in Naples suggest the injection of political favoritism into an agency tasked with saving lives and rebuilding communities wiped out by disaster. It also heightens concerns about the discretion Noem has given herself by personally handling all six-figure expenses at the agency, consolidating her power over who wins and loses in the pursuit of federal relief dollars, experts said.

Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University, said that politics has long been a factor in federal disaster relief — one study found that swing states are more likely to get federal help, for example. But “I’ve not heard of anything this egregious — a donor calling up and saying I need help and getting it,” he said, “while others may be getting denied assistance or otherwise waiting in line for help that may or may not come.”

In a statement, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said, “This has nothing to do with politics: Secretary Noem also visited Ruidoso, NM” — where floods killed three people in July — “at the request of a Democrat governor and has been integral in supporting and speeding up their recovery efforts.”

“Your criticizing the Secretary’s visit to the Pier is bizarre as she works to fix this issue for more than 1 million visitors that used to visit the pier,” McLaughlin added. She did not answer questions about the donor’s role in expediting the funding or Noem’s relationship with him. Reached by phone, Gursoy said “get lost” and hung up. He did not respond to detailed follow up questions.

Noem has been criticized for creating a bottleneck at FEMA. When the floods hit Texas this summer — ultimately killing over 100 people — it took days to deploy critical search-and-rescue teams because Noem hadn’t signed off on them, according to CNN. Budd, the Republican senator, said this month: “Pretty much everything Helene-related is over $100,000. So they’re stacking up on her desk waiting for her signature.”

Noem has denied there were delays in the Texas flood response and has defended her expense policy, saying it has saved billions of dollars. “Every day I get up and I think, the American people are paying for this, should they?” she recently said. “And are these dollars doing what the law says they should be doing? I’m going to make sure that they go there.”

Once a sleepy fishing town, Naples is now home to CEOs and billionaires (a property listed for $295 million recently made headlines as the most expensive home in the U.S.). The city is known as an important stop for Republican politicians raising money, and Noem has held multiple fundraisers in the area. State credit card records suggest she visited Naples at least 10 times during her last four years as South Dakota governor.

Noem’s top adviser, Corey Lewandowski, also appears to own a home in Naples near the city’s pier, according to property tax records. Lewandowski is an unpaid staffer at DHS serving as Noem’s de facto chief of staff. (Media reports have alleged the two are romantically involved, which they have both denied.) Lewandowski told ProPublica that he was not involved in the pier decision and that he was not in Naples during Noem’s visit.

For the first seven months of the Trump administration, the pier reconstruction was in bureaucratic purgatory. The city had long been struggling to secure the regulatory approvals it needed to start building, and emails suggest Trump’s wave of federal layoffs had made the process even slower. “These agencies are undergoing significant reorganizations and staff reductions,” a city official told a frustrated constituent in early August. That “sometimes means starting over with new reviewers — something we’ve faced more than once.”

McLaughlin said “both past FEMA and the City bear responsibility” for the delays. She listed “several failures” since the process started in 2023, including “FEMA staff changing up” and indecision by the city government.

By this summer, Naples officials were getting desperate. In June, one tried to enlist Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., to press FEMA to move ahead. “We were told yesterday that Secretary Noem would have to ‘personally’ approve the Pier project before FEMA funding would be obligated,” the city official wrote to the senator’s staff. The Naples mayor, Teresa Heitmann, also personally wrote to FEMA. Heitmann said she was “perplexed” by the delays and begged the agency for guidance.

Heitmann had long been paying expensive Washington consultants to help her city navigate the process. But she was “feeling increasingly helpless,” she later said, until she had the idea that would finally put her project on the fast track. On July 18, the mayor emailed a Google search to herself: “Who is the head of Homeland security?” She was going to go straight to Noem.

Heitmann determined that her best bet for getting Noem’s attention was Gursoy. A Naples cardiologist, Gursoy has no obvious experience working with the federal government; much of his online footprint centers on his enthusiasm for pinball. But Gursoy gave Noem at least $25,000 to support her campaign for governor in 2022. That was enough to put him near the top of Noem’s disclosed donor list. (In South Dakota, campaign contributions remain relatively small.)

On planning documents for the 2024 Republican National Convention obtained by ProPublica, the Florida doctor is listed as an attendee affiliated with the delegation from South Dakota, a state he has no apparent connection to besides his support for Noem. Heitmann told ProPublica that Gursoy introduced her to Noem at a political event at a private home in Naples while Noem was governor.

“Hello it’s Teresa,” the mayor texted Gursoy in early August. “I really need your help.” She explained the tangle of bureaucracy she’d been contending with. “FEMA is holding us up,” Heitmann wrote. “Kristi Noem could put some fire under the FEMA employees slacking.”

Gursoy responded: “Okay. I will get on it.”

The next week, on Aug. 11, the doctor gave Heitmann an update. “Kristi was off for a few days for the first time in a long time, so I left her alone,” he said. “I just txted her now.” Within 24 hours, he had exciting news. He told the mayor to expect a call from Noem’s “FEMA fixer” shortly.

The identity of the “fixer” is not clear, but by Aug. 27, Naples officials were seeing a “flurry of activity” from Noem’s agency. That day, a FEMA staffer told the city that “FEMA is intending to expedite the funding” for the pier. “Secretary Noem took immediate action when I reached out to ask for help,” the mayor soon posted on Facebook.

Two days later, Noem flew to Naples. Her schedule listed a 30-minute walk-through at the pier with the mayor, followed by a nail salon appointment and dinner at Bleu Provence, which serves wagyu short ribs and seared foie gras. Noem then stayed through the weekend at the four-star Naples Bay Resort & Marina. Heitmann told ProPublica she wasn’t at the French dinner but Gursoy was. “I didn’t ask her to come, but she showed up,” the mayor told the local news. “I was very impressed.”

Before she left town, Noem posted about the Naples pier on Instagram. She was finally getting the project back on track, she said. “Americans deserve better than years of red tape and failed disaster responses,” Noem wrote. “Under @POTUS Trump, this incompetency ends.”

PROPUBLICA IS A DEMOCRATIC MOUTHPIECE AND CONSTANT COMPLAINER….THEY BASICALLY HATE SMART WOMEN THAT TRUMP HAS APPOINTED, INSTEAD OF THE UGLY, AND STUPID ONES APPOINTED BY OBAMA, BIDEN AND OTHER “DUMBOCRATS”.

RUSSIAN SOLDIERS, WHO WANT TO LEAVE THE WAR ZONE, ARE SIMPLY SHOT, WHAT A GREAT WAY TO MOTIVATE TO JOIN THE MILITARY!

Photo: Russian forces firing on their own soldiers as they try to leave their positions (Getty Images)© RBC-Ukraine

Ukrainian intelligence has once again intercepted communications of the Russian military, in which a commander orders fire on his own troops, according to a post by the Defense Intelligence of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense on Telegram.

Soldiers of the Defense Intelligence intercepted another conversation of the Russian military in the Donetsk region. The Russian commander orders the execution of subordinates who try to retreat from their positions.

“There’s no way to retreat, none! No one is retreating anywhere, d*** it! I’m telling you again, d*** it: if anyone tries to run off, f****** shoot them. We are moving only forward, f****** h***, only forward, d*** it,” the Russian commander says.

In addition, Ukrainian intelligence emphasized in their post that the Russian troops will face just retribution for every crime committed against the Ukrainian people.

Defense Intelligence interception

Earlier, we reported that Ukrainian intelligence intercepted a conversation of the Russian forces in which they admitted to maiming their own soldiers when they tried to flee the battlefield. From the conversation, it appears that their comrade with broken limbs would be used as “bait” for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The Defense Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense previously published a conversation in which a relative of one of the Russian military revealed that out of 25 Russian soldiers in the war against Ukraine, only two remained alive.

In addition, the Defense Intelligence published a recording of the Russian military’s conversations in which a Russian commander in the Novopavlivka direction orders his subordinates to force Ukrainian soldiers to surrender and then kill them.

PUTIN IS SURE WINNING THE HEARTS OF HIS PEOPLE!

THE TRUTH HURTS, GREAT SIGN OUTSIDE RESTAURANTANT!

People are irate about a cowboy’s very blunt sign as they try to remove it — BIG mistake

eople are irate about a cowboy’s very blunt sign as they try to remove it — BIG mistake

A Florida seafood restaurant owner was so fed up with what he’d seen that he got off the fence for the first time to share exactly how he felt by posting four blunt phrases on the sign outside his business.

Not concerned with who he would offend, he got more than he expected when certain people saw it, but the cowboy had a surprise for them.

People are irate about a cowboy's very blunt sign as they try to remove it — BIG mistake

William “Bill” Davis has been in the business of serving the people of Sarasota the freshest seafood around and providing friendly customer service for years at Barnacle Bill’s Seafood Restaurant. Being in a public business, Bill said he’s always kept his opinions to himself but couldn’t do it anymore after seeing what Democrats were trying to do.

The conservative didn’t want any liberals telling him how to live, so he put a special message on his marquee. To say that it didn’t go over well with those who have different political views is a bit of an understatement. When those who oppose his sentiments tried to retaliate, it backfired on them.

$1 TRILLION PAY PACKAGE FOR MUSK!!!!

Tesla Board Proposes Musk Pay Package Worth as Much as $1 Trillion Over Decade

CEO would receive shares in tranches dependent on milestones including $8.5 trillion market cap

The proposed pay deal for Elon Musk is set to go to a shareholder vote in early November. Photo: chip somodevilla/Reuters

Tesla’s board asks investors to approve a new pay package for Elon Musk, potentially worth $1 trillion over 10 years.

The maximum payout, a 12% stake, hinges on Tesla reaching an $8.5 trillion market cap and other business goals.
Shareholders will vote Nov. 6 on the proposal, which could raise Musk’s stake to 29% and boost his voting power.

An artificial-intelligence tool created this summary, which was based on the text of the article and checked by an editor. Read more about how we use artificial intelligence in our journalism.

Tesla’s board asks investors to approve a new pay package for Elon Musk, potentially worth $1 trillion over 10 years.

board is asking investors to approve a new pay package for Chief Executive Elon Musk that could be worth as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.

The proposed arrangements could see Musk, already the world’s wealthiest individual, awarded various installments of shares dependent on Tesla hitting a series of milestones, according to a financial filing published Friday.

The maximum payout would represent a 12% stake in the company, contingent on milestones including Tesla reaching a market capitalization of $8.5 trillion. At that market value, such a stake would be worth slightly more than $1 trillion. Tesla’s current market value is just over $1 trillion.

“Retaining and incentivizing Elon is fundamental to Tesla…becoming the most valuable company in history,” Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm said in a letter to investors. The package was “designed to align extraordinary long-term shareholder value with incentives that will drive peak performance from our visionary leader.”

The proposal would lift Musk’s stake in the electric-vehicle maker to as much as 29% if all of the targets are met, according to the filing, also boosting his voting power.

Tesla shares rose 2% in premarket trading Friday.

Tesla robotaxi driving on a city street.

Among the proposed goals is a major expansion of Tesla’s robotaxi service, which is currently available in Austin. Photo: joel angel juarez/Reuters

In addition to market-cap milestones, payouts would depend on Musk hitting business and financial targets. These include delivering 20 million Tesla vehicles and a million robots, as well as putting a million robotaxis into commercial operation. A fourth product goal is for Tesla to secure 10 million subscribers for its Full Self Driving service.

The most challenging financial goal is for Tesla to generate $400 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. It reported $16.645 billion in adjusted Ebitda for 2024.

The filing also included a shareholder proposal for Tesla to invest in Musk’s artificial-intelligence startup, xAI. Musk has repeatedly mobilized his business empire to boost xAI, with SpaceX agreeing in July to invest $2 billion in it. Tesla’s board didn’t offer a recommendation on how investors should vote.

Musk floated the idea in July, writing on his social-media platform X: “If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago.”

Shareholders are due to vote on the proposals on Nov. 6.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.

Musk’s 2018 pay deal was struck down by a Delaware judge, who said the process was deeply flawed and criticized the company’s board for a lack of transparency.

Tesla’s directors said the then-record stock-option deal, which amounted to more than $55 billion in compensation, was necessary to keep Musk focused on the carmaker amid a slump in sales and increased competition from overseas. He has run the company without a pay package since then, though last month the Tesla board approved a stock award for Musk that it tentatively valued at $23.7 billion.

Besides Tesla, Musk oversees xAI, SpaceX, Neuralink, X and the Boring Company.

In recent years, some Tesla investors started to question the CEO’s commitment to the company, as Musk dedicated more of his time and energy to political causes. In 2022, he completed a $44 billion takeover of Twitter. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” spent an increasing amount of time posting on the platform.

Musk later cozied up to President Trump, donating vast sums to his election campaign and eventually acting as a close White House adviser.

That relationship eventually soured.

WALL STREET LOVES THE CORPORATE BREAK UP, TIME FOR BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ALSO?

Wall Street is falling in love with the corporate breakup. Here’s why.

Big Food company shake-ups: Is it time to invest?

David Hollerith · Senior Reporter

This year is turning out to be a big one for breakups.

Whether by offloading a business unit, spinning out a corporate arm through an IPO, or carving up a Fortune 500 company, that means more fees for bankers and potentially improved returns for investors.

Through the end of July, US firms announced $725 billion in corporate breakup deals this year, according to the most recent data from Dealogic. That’s a 48% jump from last year’s level of divestiture activity over the same period.

“There’s a lot of companies staring at their portfolios and wondering, ‘Am I the best owner for these assets?'” Kevin Desai, head of PwC’s deals team, said in an interview.

Fodder for some of this year’s biggest splits: past mergers that no longer work. Those companies need a change, whether it’s to pay down debt, cut costs, or boost a lagging stock price, according to Desai.

“You’re not getting credit for being a large, diversified conglomerate anymore,” he added.

Shareholders shop for discounted products at the Kraft Heinz booth at the annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, U.S., May 4, 2019. REUTERS/Scott Morgan — Big breakup: The Kraft Heinz booth at the annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting in Omaha, Neb.. REUTERS / Reuters

Earlier this week, Kraft Heinz (KHC) confirmed plans to end its megamerger consummated a decade ago that its largest shareholder, Warren Buffett, helped mastermind.

Meanwhile, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) unveiled plans to buy another coffeemaker, JDE Peets, for $22.7 billion, merging it with its coffee business to then spin out that entity via IPO.

Chemical company DuPont (DD) has agreed to sell its Kevlar and Nomex business to rival Arclin for $1.8 billion, the latest in its decade-long rightsizing effort.

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) said it’s ending its debt-saddled combo back in June, just three years after its merger.

Over the first half of 2025, the average completed divestiture deal by US sellers, according to PwC data, has swelled to $512 million, more than twice the average for the same period over each of the past two years.

Some of the biggest separations have been within the food and beverage business, where executives and their boards are having to do some “self-reflection.” They are trying to adjust to shifting consumer tastes after years of higher grocery prices and a heightened aversion to processed foods.

“We recognize that the complexity of the business was actually leading to not driving the type of performance that we wanted to get to,” Kraft Heinz CEO Carlos Abrams-Rivera told Yahoo Finance’s Brian Sozzi. The breakup separates the company’s slower-growing American food business (hot dogs) from its international condiments and sauces division (ketchup).

“It really has been a thorough review of what essentially was the premise that we believed that there was unlocked value in the company that wasn’t truly being assessed appropriately outside,” he added.

Debt-saddled? The Warner Bros. Discovery logo is seen during the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity in Cannes, France, on June 22, 2022. (Reuters/Eric Gaillard/File Photo) · Reuters / Reuters

Keurig Dr Pepper is planning a two-step deal. First, it will acquire European coffeemaker JDE Peets for $22.7 billion and combine the beverage company with its own coffee business. Second, it will spin out that entity through an IPO, the company said last week.

Jif peanut butter maker J.M. Smucker (SJM) officially sold off two baked-good brands, Cloverhill and Big Texas, to JTM Foods for $40 million earlier this year. Those brands came with its $5.6 billion acquisition of Twinkie maker Hostess seven years ago.

Sony plans to spin off its financial services arm through an IPO in late September.

Major lender Citigroup (C) plans to ready itself for a spin-off of its Mexico consumer bank, Banamex, by the end of the year, though market conditions and regulatory approvals could push that to 2026, CEO Jane Fraser told analysts in July.

Longer-term stock underperformance compared to peers is one of the biggest reasons for a corporate split, and that can spur a need for action, especially when activist investors join the conversation.

Over the first half of 2025, the number of activist campaigns rose 16% compared to the five-year average. Compared to the past decade, activist investors waging campaigns have risen a sharper 44%, according to PwC.

This week, Elliott Investment Management, one of the most successful Wall Street firms at waging activist campaigns, took a stake in beverage giant PepsiCo (PEP).

The firm stopped short of calling for a divestment, but it has in past campaigns. US conglomerate Honeywell (HON) said earlier this year that it’s separating into three different companies, months after Elliott advocated for a breakup and disclosed a $5 billion stake in the firm.

Breakup activity, PwC’s Desai said, “will continue to pick up.”

“It is time to break up the failed conglomerate model that is holding back the value at Berkshire Hathaway as well!”, said c. Adam Jansen, CEO of consulting firm Sterling Cooper, Inc, www.sterlingcooper.info

PALESTINE IS A BEGGAR TERRORIST STATE GETTING WAY TOO MUCH ATTENTION, AND WHY???

French President Macron Rewards Terrorism, Whips Up Slaughter

by Guy Millière

So, Macron actually regards these views — approving the October 7, 2023 massacre of Jews and continuing terrorism to displace Israel — as “legitimate aspirations”? Good to know.
Macron’s calls for an immediate ceasefire could save Hamas from destruction — exactly what Hamas and Qatar want.
France, the UK, Canada and Australia have to see that the terrorist state they are about to recognize has no borders, no internationally recognized territory, and meets no criteria of any kind as required in the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) for a state to be recognized.
“Article 80 of the UN Charter… preserves intact all the rights granted to Jews under the Mandate for Palestine, even after the Mandate’s expiry on May 14-15, 1948…. As a direct result of Article 80, the UN cannot transfer these rights over any part of Palestine… to any non-Jewish entity.” — Howard Grief, Esq., Algemeiner, September 22, 2011.
France, the UK, Canada and Australia also realize that Israel cannot stop the war without the return of all the hostages. What would they do if their citizens were held hostage? Or are they already?
If France, the UK, Canada and Australia are so committed to the creation of a Palestinian State, surely they will be happy to donate some of their plentiful land for it.
[A]pproximately 1,000 trucks were blocked for days because the United Nations refused to distribute the aid, leaving it to rot in the sun, even after Israel offered the UN military protection.
In November 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The ICC accused them — not Hamas which stole most of the food — of crimes against humanity.
Hamas is an organization with straightforwardly unhidden genocidal goals:….
This continual demonization of Israel has sadly led to an increased hatred of Israel, a tiny country that, ironically, is fighting to protect the very countries defaming it. A thank you would be nice.
What is at stake now is not only Israel’s survival but the need for democracies to understand the central danger confronting them, and finally to start combatting it.
During the Second World War, all those grateful for the hard-won freedoms of the democratic world saw that the only way out was not compromise and submission, but the full destruction of the Third Reich — not giving it a “state.”

On July 24, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he will officially recognize a “Palestinian State,” and publicized a letter he sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, praising his “courageous commitments”. Since the creation of the Palestinian Authority in 1994, Abbas has enthusiastically backed anti-Israeli terrorism; supported the erasure of Israel; and has a lavish, multi-billion dollar “pay-to-slay” program that funds the murder of Jews. Pictured: Macron meets with Abbas during the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. (Photo by Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images)

July 24, 2025: French President Emmanuel Macron announces that he will officially recognize a “Palestinian State.” He publicizes a letter he sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and praises his “courageous commitments”. In it, Macron emphasizes his desire to “fulfill the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people” and that “We must immediately implement a ceasefire, release all hostages and provide massive humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza,”⁠ Macron reportedly announced. He did not, however make recognizing a fictitious Palestinian state conditioned on any of that.

“Peace is possible,” he added, along with the notion that “Building a Palestinian state and ensuring its viability would ‘contribute to the security of all in the Middle East.”‘

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu replied that the decision “rewards terror” and would create ” a launch pad to annihilate Israel .”

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Macron’s decision is “a slap in the face to the victims of October 7.”

Hamas, for its part, immediately congratulated Macron and said that his decision constituted “a positive step in the right direction.”

Macron appears either indifferent or unaware of the effect his announcement might have on the hostages that Hamas kidnapped and is still torturing and starving in its tunnels. He also seems unaware that even if Abbas, now in the 20^th year of his four-year term, suddenly condemned the massacre of October 7, 2023, that for almost two years, the Palestinian Authority (PA) and its Fatah political wing wholeheartedly celebrated it.

Since the creation of the Palestinian Authority in 1994, Abbas has enthusiastically backed anti-Israeli terrorism; supported the erasure of Israel (as well as here, and here); has a lavish, multi-billion dollar “pay-to-slay” program that funds murdering Jews, and uses textbooks that incite children to murder Jews.

Does Macron actually think that financing anti-Israeli terrorism, supporting the eradication of Israel, and inciting children to kill Jews are “courageous commitments”?

Macron apparently has no interest in seeing what the real aspirations of Palestinian Arabs are. Recent polls show that 64% of Arabs living under the rule of the Palestinian Authority think that the “two-state solution” is “no longer practical”, 72% approve of the October 7 massacre, and 41% support an “armed struggle” (terrorism) to destroy Israel. So, Macron actually regards these views — approving the October 7, 2023 massacre of Jews and continuing terrorism to displace Israel — as “legitimate aspirations”? Good to know.

Macron acts as if he has no idea that, if elections were held today in the West Bank territories ruled by the Palestinian Authority, Hamas would win in a landslide — meaning that the state he is planning to recognize would be a terrorist state led by an organization dedicated to obliterating Israel? France, the UK, Canada and Australia also approved recognizing a terrorist state.

Macron says he wants “the release of all hostages,” but his announcement may well have doomed them. “Talks with Hamas fell apart on the day Macron made the unilateral decision that he’s going to recognize the Palestinian state,” Rubio stated. As soon as Macron’s decision was announced, Hamas broke off negotiations. Macron may have sentenced the remaining hostages to death.

After seeing the horrific images of starved, tortured, and skeletal hostages released by Hamas, Macron wrote: “Abject cruelty, limitless inhumanity: this is what Hamas embodies.” This observation, however, did not lead him to change his position or state any conditions.

Macron’s calls for an immediate ceasefire could save Hamas from destruction — exactly what Hamas and Qatar want.

Macron barely mentions the October 7th massacre, thereby conveniently omitting that it was the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. This “oversight” amounts to exonerating Hamas from the immensity of its crime. Macron’s declaration is not just “a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th”, it is a slap in the face to all the Israelis who still live in pain from the October 7th massacre; to all the families of hostages who know the horror of the treatment Hamas is still inflicting on the victims it still holds; to all the Israeli soldiers currently risking their lives to ensure there will never be another massacre, and to all the Israelis who want to see the threat of terrorism weighing on their country and them permanently erased.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia have to see that the terrorist state they are about to recognize has no borders, no internationally recognized territory, and meets no criteria of any kind as required in the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) for a state to be recognized.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia also must see that the United Nations can only recognize a state under very specific conditions that will likely not be met. Chapter II, Article 4 of the UN Charter states that the admission of a state to membership in the United Nations “shall be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

France, the UK, Canada and Australia undoubtedly fathom that even if there were an affirmative vote in the General Assembly, the United States would immediately veto it. Even if the Democrats returned to power, it is not at all likely that they would support creating a genocidal, terrorist state.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia further know that Article 80 of the United Nations Charter makes it impossible to create a Palestinian state on the territory of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank without Israel’s agreement. Late Israeli lawyer Howard Grief noted:

“Article 80 of the UN Charter, once known unofficially as the Jewish People’s clause, which preserves intact all the rights granted to Jews under the Mandate for Palestine, even after the Mandate’s expiry on May 14-15, 1948.”

He added:

“As a direct result of Article 80, the UN cannot transfer these rights over any part of Palestine, vested as they are in the Jewish People, to any non-Jewish entity.”

France, the UK, Canada and Australia also undoubtledly realize that Israel cannot stop the war without the return of all of the hostages. What would they do if their citizens were held hostage? Or are they already?

After October 7, 2023, Israel has no choice but to resolutely oppose the creation of any terrorist state threatening it on its borders. If France, the UK, Canada and Australia are so committed to the creation of a Palestinian State, surely they will be happy to donate some of their plentiful land for it.

Macron wants to exert increased pressure only on Israel. He sees that a strong trend of hostility towards Israel has taken shape in the Western world, and he apparently enjoys playing the role of its figurehead.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia might also be joined by Portugal. Its Prime Minister Luis Montenegro has said he is leaning toward the “rapid recognition” of a Palestinian state.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul was more moderate but said:

“For Germany, the recognition of a Palestinian state comes more at the end of that process. But such a process must begin now.”

On July 21, the leaders of 31 countries issued a joint statement on “Occupied Palestinian Territories” that amounted to blood libel, stating that Israel practices “the inhumane killing of civilians, including children,” ignores the “most basic needs” of the inhabitants of Gaza, and denies them “essential humanitarian assistance.” Hamas – carefully not referred to as a terrorist organization or with any mention if its culpability — is mentioned exactly once.

A conference on the “question of Palestine,” co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, held in New York in July, led to a joint declaration “urging collective action to end the war in Gaza and to achieve a just, peaceful, and lasting resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict”. The declaration — signed by 17 countries, the 22-member Arab League, and the entire European Union — stated that Hamas must transfer authority to the Palestinian Authority with a view to the creation of a “demilitarized Palestinian state” living side by side, in peace and security with Israel. When Israel left the Gaza Strip in 2005, the Gaza Strip was not supposed to become militarized or a terrorist entity. That happened anyway, and in all probability would happen again unless Israel stopped it again.

The population of the Gaza Strip voted for Hamas to come to power in 2006. In 2007, members of the Palestinian Authority, in a coup, were either expelled, taken prisoner or executed.

Israel is now being falsely accused of causing a famine in Gaza. Most commentators completely ignore that Hamas has constantly stolen food aid entering Gaza, then hoarded it and resold it at extortionist prices. These commentators also omit that at the entrance to Gaza, approximately 1,000 trucks were blocked for days because the UN refused to distribute the aid, leaving it to rot in the sun, even after Israel offered the UN military protection.

UNRWA, which employs Hamas members, uses fake Hamas figures and falsely accuses Israel of killing Palestinian Arabs seeking food. The fake figures released by UNRWA are then used worldwide to try to criminalize Israel further. Photos of an Arab child emaciated due to a genetic illness were presented, again falsely, as photos of a child dying of starvation because of Israel.

In November 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The ICC accused them — not Hamas which stole most of the food — of crimes against humanity.

Hamas is an organization with straightforwardly unhidden genocidal goals:

“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).
– 1988 Hamas Covenant, Preamble

“The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla [slave of Allah], there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”
– 1988 Hamas Covenant, Article 7

“There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.”
– 1988 Hamas Covenant, Article 13

The October 7, 2023 massacre carried genocidal intentions that Hamas leaders did not even try to hide. Nevertheless, it is Israel that is slanderously accused of genocide. The well-documented reality is that the Israeli army does everything possible to avoid civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip. John Spencer, Chair of the Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point, who has been embedded with the IDF in Gaza four times, has stated:

“There is no genocide in Gaza….Israel has taken extraordinary steps to limit civilian harm. It warns before attacks using text messages, phone calls, leaflets, and broadcasts. It opens safe corridors and pauses operations so civilians can leave combat areas. It tracks civilian presence down to the building level. I have seen missions delayed or canceled because children were nearby. I have seen Israeli troops come under fire and still be ordered not to shoot back because civilians might be harmed.”

All the same, the accusation of genocide against Israel is peddled not only by extremist groups supporting Hamas, but also by so-called human rights organizations such as Amnesty International. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez actually called the situation in Gaza “the greatest genocide this century has witnessed.” Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin used the term “genocide” to describe the situation in Gaza. On May 28, 2024 Spain, Ireland and Norway rushed to “recognize” a make-believe Palestinian state.

This continual demonization of Israel has sadly led to an increased hatred of Israel, a tiny country that, ironically, is fighting to protect the very countries defaming it. A thank you would be nice. It is this calumny that has led to an explosion in Europe of anti-Semitic acts.

Columnist Jonathan Tobin wrote:

“Jew-hatred is not merely back in fashion… it has been sanctioned by the intellectual, academic, legal and cultural establishments across the globe, which now regard anti-Zionism as a legitimate, even enlightened point of view, even though it is a prejudicial idea that denies rights to Jews—rights denied to no one else.”

The oldest hatred is not dead. It just has new excuses, new clothes.

In a speech delivered to Congress on July 24, 2024, Prime Minister Netanyahu described the slanderous accusations against Israel, plentiful for decades, and the resulting rise in anti-Semitism. He emphasized how precious the United States’ friendship with Israel was in these decisive circumstances. He added that Israel would fight and would not bend, but that there was a growing risk that democracies would not understand the extremist danger and the urgent need to defeat it.

What is at stake now is not only Israel’s survival but the need for democracies to understand the central danger confronting them, and finally to start combatting it.

During the Second World War, all those grateful for the hard-won freedoms of the democratic world saw that the only way out was not compromise and submission, but the full destruction of the Third Reich — not giving it a “state.”