Welcome to Sterling Cooper, Inc.
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
LOGO
  • INCREASE YOUR REVENUES
    50%-100% - FREE EVALUATION
  • WEF 2025 GLOBAL
    RISKS REPORT
  • CAPITAL GAINS
    TAX DEFERRED
  • INCORPORATE
    NOW FOR $39
  • RESEARCH
    REPORTS
  • ENGULF &
    DEVOUR
  • Home
  • Services
    • Selling a Business
    • Buying a Business
    • Public Relation
    • Cooper consulting
    • Advertising
    • Publishing
    • Web and IT Services
    • Loans
  • Seller
  • buyer
  • Advertising
  • Publishing
  • M&A Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • Contact
LOGO

Category Archives: Uncategorized

DIOR $2,800 Ladies Bags Cost $57 To Make, only the Stupid Buy them!

  • IF YOU  ARE THE DUMMY PAYING $2,800 for a $57 Ladies handbag…you are the chump making billionaires ever richer.

  • The Italian police raided some of LVMH’s Dior suppliers that make luxury handbags.
  • Italian prosecutors found Dior paid $57 to produce bags retailing for $2,780.
  • Judges placed Dior and Armani units under judicial administration for one year.

Two Italian luxury giants pay just a small amount to produce handbags that retail for thousands of dollars, according to documents in a sweeping investigation of subcontractors.

There’s a lot to love about designer goods. The luxurious materials, quality craftsmanship, prestigious logos, and fashionable silhouettes — the list goes on and on. But let’s face it: those price tags can be discouraging.

Still, you shouldn’t have to keep coveting that trendy handbag or even a classic investment piece.  From resale to rentals, there are plenty of online retailers where you can find new and used luxury items at a discount. For example, The Real Real is one of the most popular consignment shops that features both household names and lesser-known designers.

If you want to test drive a designer bag so you can swap it out the next month for a different one, we recommend Vivrelle. Contributing author Talia Ergas used Vivrelle to rent her Gucci camera bag, and was so impressed with its pristine condition that she ended up buying it.

$57 Bag Sells for $2,800

 

The prosecution said violating labor rules was a common industry practice that luxury giants relied on for higher profits.

“It’s not something sporadic that concerns single production lots, but a generalized and consolidated manufacturing method,” court documents about the decision to place Dior under administration said, according to Reuters.

“The main problem is obviously people being mistreated: applying labor laws, so health and safety, hours, pay,” Fabio Roia, the president of the Milan Court, told Reuters earlier this year. “But there is also another huge problem: the unfair competition that pushes law-abiding firms off the market.”

Last year, LVMH had 2,062 suppliers and subcontractors and undertook 1,725 audits, according to its environmental- and social-responsibility report.

LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault is the world’s third richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. His daughter, Delphine Arnault, is the CEO of Dior.

I am planning to sell bags I will make by child laborers in North Korea for $2, for $2,800.

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on July 4, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

GENERAL MOTORS IS A FEMINIST FATALITY, MARY BARRA ITS CEO IS A FLAMING WORTHLESS WOKE LEMMING!

General Motors Company (GM): IS NOT BEING RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ITS STOCKHOLDERS, BUT ON A WOKE AND DISASTROUS FEMINIST PATH

With the passage of time, the role of women in the modern day workplace has slowly started to grow. In less than a century, more women not only lead companies but are also among some of the wealthiest individuals in the world.

At the same time, women have demonstrated that they are equal to men when it comes to disrupting industries. One of the best examples of this phenomena is America’s best known rocket company SpaceX. While SpaceX is famous for its founder and billionaire Elon Musk, the firm’s chief operations officer and president Gwynne Shotwell has been equally responsible for its massive success in the rocket industry which has dislodged decades of monopolies held by a few defense contractors.

In fact, this rising trend of women leading the charge at some of the biggest companies in the world has also generated interesting statistics when it comes to compensation. Data from Equilar shows that in 2023, out of the 341 CEOs part of the study, 25 were women. Their median pay package stood at $17.6 million, which according to Equilar, was 7.7% higher than the figure for the complete data set. At the same time, the 25 female CEOs saw five new executives added to the list when compared to 2022. However, the list is long of failed WOMEN CEO’s and distrous results…

ARE YOU KIDDING, DOES HAPLESS CLUELESS MARY BARRA DESERVE A $20 million annual payday? NO WAY!

In the last several year shareholders were rewarded by a share decline from $60 a share to a low in the twenties, while the woke queen extolled the virtues of every woke piece of jargon, and totally took GM out of the running in the manufacture of fossil fueled vehicles.

Pushing EV’s only with the assistance of the semi-senile old grandpa JOE, she pushed the company ito losing BILLIONS on EV’s which caught homes on fire and lost billions for the company, not to mention killing off the iconic Cadillac as an only ELECTRIC vehicle…

Is the GM Board of Directors asleep? Why is the Board allowing the femiinsts to run this company? Look at their ads? Are there any men in this company ?

Mary Barra fraudulently represents herself in the corporate reports as looking young, but in reality she is a haggard old grandma with woke ideas and is way pat the time she should be getting paid $20 million annually and pushes ideas that will destroy the GM business!

This is the real Mary Barra…OLD over the hill management.

But this is what she publishes as herself in the reports to stockholders; LOL…

WHAT CARS WILL GM SELL IN 2030…WHEN ALL WILL BE ELECTRIC? Oh, yeah, she will long be retired on that gigantic and undeserved pension!

Considering this, it would appear that the gender pay gap in the US appears to be narrowing. To confirm this, we’ll have to look at the pay statistics for the entire country as opposed to only S&P 500 CEOs. Well, on this front, data gathered by Pew shows that there’s a lot to be done. The research firm points out that in 2002, women earned 80% of what men were paid. Two decades later, i.e. in 2022, this stood at 82%, indicating that there’s a lot more to be done to decrease the wage gap between the two genders. However, at the same time, younger women might be changing these trends. This is because according to Pew, women aged between 25 and 34 earned 92% of their male counterparts, which is quite higher than the figure of 86% in 2002.

We ranked publicly traded Fortune 500 companies with female CEOs by the number of hedge funds that had bought the shares in Q1 2024. Why do we care about what hedge funds do? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter’s strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 275% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 150 percentage points.

BUT GM IS NO SHINING STAR>.

General Motors Company (NYSE:GM)

Number of Hedge Fund Shareholders In Q1 2024: 78

CEO: Mary T. Barra

General Motors Company (NYSE:GM) is one of the oldest and most iconic car manufacturers in America. Amidst a tumultuous couple of months which have seen General Motors Company (NYSE:GM) resume its autonomous driving efforts and settle disputes with unions for a battery manufacturing facility. Citi kept its Buy rating for the shares and a $96 share price target in June 2024.

The two key reasons behind the sustained optimism even as General Motors Company (NYSE:GM) has struggled in the EV industry are Citi’s belief that the US auto industry is robust and the car maker’s $11 billion share buyback. Between Q2 2024 and 2025, Citi now expects $7.1 billion in share buybacks which is significantly higher than the earlier estimate of $6.3 billion in buybacks.

SHARE BUYBACKS DO NOTHING TO ENHANCE STOCKHOLDER VALUES AND WASTE MONEY THAT SHOULD BE PAID IN DIVIDENDS!

General Motors Company (NYSE:GM)’s forward price to earnings ratio is just 5.02, which is less than 4x the S&P 500’s reading. This shouldn’t fool you though. We remember David Einhorn pitching GM at an investment conference more than 10 years ago and telling investors that GM’s PE ratio is 8 and it is an extremely cheap stock.

If GM’s true PE ratio was really 8 and the company was managed by talented individuals, they would have bought back enough shares to buy 1.5 GMs in 12 years. GM is still an “extremely” cheap company after 12 years and it underperformed the market S&P 500 Index during this period. GM’s market cap is around $50 billion, but it also has nearly $100 billion in net debt. It is a risky stock with a bankruptcy in its history. Unless General Motors’ management demonstrates a clear commitment to prioritizing shareholder interests over those of employees, we remain cautious about the GM stock.

Diamond Hill Capital mentioned the firm in its Q1 2024 investor letter. Here is what the firm said:

Automobile manufacturer General Motors continues capitalizing on the shift to electric vehicles (EVs) while maintaining the strength of its core gas-engine truck and SUV business. Though it has experienced some setbacks — such as needing to roll back its Cruise driverless car project — we believe the company remains well-positioned relative to secular tailwinds ( HE MEANS TO SAY A KICK IN THE BUTT?) within the automobile business.

THESE GENIUSES THINK THAT??? When pigs fly will Mary Barra lead GM to new glory…if ever!

Let’s list the auto brands that this feminist killed off…..now she is looking to kill off the entire company!

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 25, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

USA AND 13 REALLY STUPID OTHER COUNTRIES LABEL COWS AS CLIMATE TERRORISTS!

Famine

These 13 Countries Just Signed an Agreement to Engineer a Global Famine by Destroying Food Supply the USA id ONE OF THEM

The United States and the following 12 countries have all signed on to an agreement that in practice will destroy agriculture worldwide while ushering in global famine and starvation:

DUMBEST COUNTRIES ON THE PLANET ARE LISTED BELOW:

  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Brazil
  • Burkina Faso
  • Chile
  • Czech Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Germany
  • Panama
  • Peru
  • Spain
  • Uruguay

A loss of meat production from Australia, Brazil and the U.S. alone would be enough to starve countless people, not to mention all the other foods that are raised and grown in these three countries.

 


Citing “climate change” and “global warming” as the reasons why such drastic measures must be taken, the globalists behind the climate scam are pushing the notion that agriculture, including animal rearing, must end in order to prevent animal flatulence from heating the environment.

“I am glad to see the shared commitment by the international community to mitigate methane emissions from agriculture as a means to achieve the goals we signed for in the Paris Agreement on climate,” said Luis Planas, Spain’s Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, in a statement.

Marcelo Mena, CEO of the Global Methane Hub, of course agrees.

“Food systems are responsible for 60 percent of methane emissions,” Mena explained in an announcement.

Without farms, there is no food-you GLOBAL MORONS!

Over the weekend, Vice President Kamala Harris made a statement of her own calling for a “reduced population.” This can be accomplished in part through the destruction of the global food supply.

The latest version of the global warming narrative is that food itself causes it. Apparently, the entire world must go back to a hunter and gatherer society with very few actual people remaining in order for the planet to “cool” itself down and return to “normal.”

“Mitigating methane is the fastest way to reduce warming in the short term,” claims former presidential wannabe John Kerry, who continues to be one of the loudest purveyors of global warming propaganda.

“Food and agriculture can contribute to a low-methane future by improving farmer productivity and resilience. We welcome agriculture ministers participating in the implementation of the Global Methane Pledge.”

Part of the Global Methane Pledge, by the way, involves transitioning the world from eating real foods like beef and chicken to instead consuming crickets and insect larvae, which are toxic and non-nutritious to humans.

As you can clearly see with the ongoing inflationary trend, which appears to be hyperinflation in slow motion, we are reaching a point where meat and food in general will become so unaffordable for the average person that many will have no choice but to try bugs, assuming they want to continue living in such a world.

“We can presume from this language that among the practices being considered are replacing a major portion of the beef and dairy cattle, pork, and chicken stocks that populations rely on for protein with insect larvae, mealworms, crickets, etc.,” says journalist Leo Hohmann about what the Global Methane Pledge entails.

“The U.N., World Economic Forum, and other NGOs have been promoting meatless diets and the consumption of insect protein for years, and billionaires have invested in massive insect factories being built in the state of Illinois, in Canada, and in the Netherlands, where mealworms, crickets, and other bugs will be processed as additives to be inserted into the food supply, often without clear labels that will inform people of exactly what they are eating.”

The powers-that-be REALLY want us eating crickets, lab-grown “meat,” or both. It’s all about control.

COWS ARE NOW CONSIDERED GLOBAL CLIMATE TERRORISTS!

Are we even surprised that our leaders want to murder us by destroying the food supply?

STOP THE INSANITY….!!!!! PLEASE LET ME HAVE  STEAK!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 25, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

THINGS ARE BAD WHEN HOOTERS SHUTS DOWN RESTAURANTS

Hooters has abruptly shuttered 40 locations ,

Hooters – known for its scantily-clad waitresses – is the latest restaurant chain to abruptly shutters locations.

Like other struggling chains such as Red Lobster, Hooters is blaming the rising cost of rent and food.

A raft of closures happened over the weekend, while others were in recent weeks. They include locations in Florida, Kentucky, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia.

The company is not thought to be in as dire financial situation as Red Lobster, which has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

In fact, bosses said the 41-year-old brand ‘remains highly resilient and relevant,’ and highlighted a new range of Hooters frozen food which is being sold in supermarkets across America.

Hooters has recently shut around 40 restaurants

Hooters has recently shut around 40 restaurants

The chain is known for its scantily-clad waitresses

The chain is known for its scantily-clad  but awfully cute, waitresses

‘Like many restaurants under pressure from current market conditions, Hooters has made the difficult decision to close a select number of underperforming stores,’ a spokesperson told DailyMail.com.

‘We look forward to continuing to serve our guests at home, on the go and at our restaurants here in the US and around the globe.’

Hooters will have about 300 restaurants globally after the closures. That is down from 333 in 2018.

Rivals Dave & Buster’s, Miller’s Ale House and Twin Peaks all have more restaurants.

Restaurants have been putting up prices over the past two years – as they pass on higher costs to customers. But these price hikes have led to a fall in visitors.

Bigger chains like Applebee’s, TGI Fridays and  Boston Market have have all recently shuttered restaurants, as have smaller chains like BurgerFi.

The first Hooters opened in Clearwater, Florida in 1983

The first Hooters opened in Clearwater, Florida in 1983

The sports bar-style restaurant is well known for its wings and its scantily clad waitresses, 'Hooters Girls'

The sports bar-style restaurant is well known for its wings and its scantily clad waitresses, ‘Hooters Girls’

Hooters,opened six new locations in 2023. Three in Las Vegas, and three in Florida, where the brand originated

Hooters,opened six new locations in 2023. Three in Las Vegas, and three in Florida, where the brand originated

I’m one of Hooters’ only XL waitresses – and people think I’m the hottest one

article image

Chains have been worst hit in California where the minimum wage for fast food restaurants jumped to $20-an-hour from April 1. Mexican chain Rubio’s shut 48 locations in the state.

Hooters, as well as being known for scantily clad waitresses, also calls itself ‘the original American wing joint’, and celebrated its 40th birthday in 2023.

Only last May, it was opening restaurants – three in Las Vegas and three in Florida.

The first Hooters opened in Clearwater, Florida in 1983.

PLEASE OPEN SOME MORE SOON!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 25, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

FORD MOTORS SHAFTS DEALERS WITH SILLY AND POINTLESS EV CERTIFICATION

Dealers Who Forked Out for Ford’s ‘Exclusive’ EV ‘Certification’ Feel Like They Got SHAFTED

We can tel it is you Grandpa, mask did not hide you!
Ford has had an awfully good quarter on the EV and hybrid side of the business if you only look at the sales numbers the company reported in May.

Ford Motor’s U.S. new vehicle sales rose 11.2% last month compared with May of last year, boosted by strong sales growth for all-electric and hybrid models.

The Detroit automaker on Tuesday reported roughly 65% increases in sales of both hybrid and all-electric vehicles. That’s compared with a 5.6% rise in sales of Ford’s traditional vehicles with internal combustion engines.

“Woot!” right? Pass the champagne?

Not entirely. Those sales still only make up 14% of Ford’s overall volume – not something a company wants to hear that was going to switch their focus to an all-electric footprint. Hybrids are beginning to outstrip EV sales, which is why Ford has delayed the development of any new EV models.

And the worse EV news of all is what the company loses on every one of the electrics it sells – its asterisk.

…Ford reported in April the division lost $1.32 billion on 10,000 vehicles wholesaled from January through March. While the unit also includes EV-related business such as software, those losses equate to a loss of $132,000 for each vehicle the unit sells.

Even in a world of glassy, Green house gassy, grifting government subsidies and unicorn farts, that is unsustainable.

EV progress at Ford has come at a steep price for everyone involved, not just corporate mucky-mucks and the poor sods who were excited to be assigned to the Lightning line before they shut it down a couple of months later.

Dealers who’d paid over half to a million plus dollars to be Ford EV “certified” to be able to sell the all-electric things in what was billed as an exclusive “or else not at all” arrangement were kind of blown away at a surprise announcement out of corporate HQ last week.

Ford yanked the football.

Crazy how Ford required dealers to invest hundreds of thousands to get “certified” to sell EVs

And today discontinued the program on a whim.

One dealer DMd me that they spent over $600K on the certification, and they’re anxious about getting the money back.

Ford claims they…

— Car Dealership Guy (@GuyDealership) June 14, 2024

Advertisement

Businesses that are out as much as more than a million and a half buckarooskies have questions.

Ford ends controversial EV program, shocking dealers

Detroit Big Three automaker Ford  (F)  is changing the way the brand sells its battery-electric vehicles, with its latest move placing the automaker’s EVs within easy reach of nearly 90% of Americans.

Though the new move can translate to more sales and increased foot traffic for dealers, Ford retailers have mixed reactions, as it involved the axing of a controversial and expensive program that the Blue Oval hung over their heads.

…Originally announced on September 14, 2022, the Model e dealer certification program was designed for the Ford brand to have an edge over EV startups like Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid.

While startups conducted online EV sales and dealt with a limited physical footprint, Ford had an advantage with its dealer network, which it envisioned as a one-stop-shop for EV customers buying, maintaining and charging Ford-branded EVs.

Ford initially gave its dealers until October 31 that year to choose an ultimatum for the potential future of their businesses, which was later pushed to December 2 due to weight of the situation at hand.

Those who wanted into the program could choose one of two certification “levels” that required extensive investment in EV infrastructure equipment and training.

Dealers that wanted to be a Model e Certified dealer needed to invest up to $500,000 in training and charging equipment, while those that opted to be a Model e Certified Elite dealer were looking at an investment of up to $1.2 million. Ford executives said that actual costs for dealerships turned out much lower than their estimates.

Dealers also had the ability to opt out of the Model e dealer certification program, but required them to discontinue selling Ford-branded EVs entirely starting on January 1, 2024.

Dealers who fell for the hype feel like they were sold a very expensive bill of goods.

…As part of the program, Jim Seavitt, owner of Village Ford in Dearborn, Michigan bought two DC fast-chargers, as well as eight level 2 chargers; more than enough EV charging capacity for a dealer his size.

“Given the number of EVs we have sold and will sell in the next year, it’s overkill,” he told The Detroit News. “I thought I had to do it to sell electric. Those that didn’t do it got off the hook. They have to make that part of it right.”

Apparently the exclusive EV insult to injury doesn’t end with a check for the chargers they install or the training your mechs went through, either. You’re enrolled in one of those plans like the TV commercials where they send you a box and a bill every three months whether you want or need it, and good luck trying to cancel that sucker.

Ford originally presented their program tiers to dealerships mid-September 2022 with an October drop-dead date, and there were about 2000 dealers who initially thought they’d give it a go.

…That deadline was later extended to December 2nd, as many dealers complained that six weeks wasn’t enough time for such a major decision. The company offered its dealers three options:

  • Become a Model e Certified Elite dealership
  • Become a Model e Certified dealership
  • Discontinue selling Model e vehicles (all Ford BEVs) effective January 1st, 2024

Of the 1,920 franchises that agreed to become Model e dealers, initially, 1,659 chose to be Certified Elite with full sales and service capability. 261 dealers chose to be Certified with full-service capability, limited sales, and a lower investment cost.

I was told today that currently, about 1,500 dealers are Model e certified dealerships, so about 400 of the initial hand-raisers decided against the Model e business model.

There is no doubt those 400 lucky ducks who fell out at the last moment are lighting candles in praise and giving hugely to charity in thanks for their deliverance.

l bet they were happy, especially right now.

Maybe there was even more to scrapping the program than merely trying to make it easier to offload hugely Ford’s expensive EVs piling up.

…I asked Marin Gjaja, COO of Ford Model e if the decision to end the program only six months after it officially began was because of the intense pushback and lawsuits from dealership associations across the country and was told that wasn’t the case, but it’s hard to believe that didn’t play a major role in the decision to pull the plug.

Sure sounds like everyone was unhappy and states were starting to back the dealer associations that went the legal route.

…According to Business Insider, Dealer dissatisfaction with the high costs of the certification program was evident early on, with several dealer associations filing lawsuits against Ford. An Illinois board ruled in favor of dealers, stating that the program violated state laws. By December of last year, more than half of Ford’s nearly 3,000 US dealers had opted out of the EV investment requirements, indicating the program’s failure.

I’m no math major – I only play one here at HotAir – but I imagine making good on those “Elite e” etc. dealerships (if and when Ford ever does) will add a buck or two to the already staggering loss they take on every Ford EV they sell.

Hopefully, results in November will mean they won’t be able to look to POTATUS for more bailouts.

It would be nice to catch a break.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 19, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez are unhappy but sure have a lot of HOMES !

Inside Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck’s Multimillion-Dollar Real Estate Empire

A source told PEOPLE the couple are selling the Beverly Hills home they’ve shared since 2023

<p>Christopher Polk/Golden Globes 2024/Golden Globes 2024 via Getty </p> Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez

Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck are quietly trying to sell the $61 million Beverly Hills mansion they’ve shared since June 2023, an insider told PEOPLE. But the impressive spread is far from their only major chunk of real estate.

Amid reports of a strain in their marriage, a source close to Lopez said that neither of the two stars has been happy with the home, which they purchased after a long house hunt in June of last year.

“Ben never liked the house. It’s too far away from his kids,” said the source, adding that the house is “way too big” for the singer. The massive property features 12 bedrooms and 24 bathrooms.

Of course, both Lopez, 54, and Affleck, 51, have owned plenty of other high-profile properties. Here’s everything to know about all the places they’ve lived throughout the years.

Beverly Hills

The couple bought the 38,000 square-foot home they’re currently trying to sell in the spring of 2023, per the TheWall Street Journal, after tying the knot the previous year.

Located on five acres of land, the house has “12 bedrooms, 24 bathrooms, a 12-car garage and a pool, plus a sports complex with basketball and pickleball facilities, a gym and a boxing ring,” according to the newspaper.

Courtesy of Carolwood Estates Lopez's Bel Air home
Courtesy of Carolwood Estates Lopez’s Bel Air home

Bel Air

Lopez found a buyer for her previous Bel Air mansion in October 2023, according to a report from the Journal. First listed for $42.5 million in February of that year, the eight-acre estate eventually sold for just under $34 million.

At more than 12,000 square feet, the sprawling property features nine beds and 12 and a half baths. Originally designed by architect Samuel Marx, it was later reworked into a French country-inspired retreat, according to the listing.

Fittingly, at the time of the listing, a private screening room on the lower lounge level featured posters for Lopez and Affleck’s movies.

Related: Behind Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck’s Decision to Sell Their $61 Million Mansion (Exclusive Source)

<p>Getty</p> New York City skyline
Manhattan

The Maid in Manhattan star unloaded her $25 million New York City penthouse in April 2024, after seven years on and off the market.

The asking price for the four-bedroom, seven-and-a-half bathroom property, located near Manhattan’s Madison Square Park, was most recently $24,990,000, though its listing agents didn’t confirm the final sale price.

The 9,500-square-foot space is in a historic 1924 mansion conversion and features an indoor/outdoor design with four private terraces that offer views of the New York City skyline.

Amenities include a full-time doorman, top-of-the-line kitchen with a large island, a stainless-steel wine fridge, breakfast bar and a private guest wing with three bedrooms, staff quarters and a laundry room.

Pacific Palisades

Affleck listed his Pacific Palisades home in August 2022 for $30 million, following his marriage to Lopez. The 13,500-square-foot property, featuring seven bedrooms and nine bathrooms, is located near the swanky Riviera Country Club, with mountain views.

Per the Los Angeles Times, he sold it for $28.5 million in October 2022.

The Argo director purchased the then-newly-built gated property in 2018 for $19 million after his divorce from ex-wife Jennifer Garner, according to the Journal.

<p>David LEFRANC/Gamma-Rapho/Getty</p> Star Island
Star Island

Miami’s Star Island

Lopez and former fiancé Alex Rodriguez, purchased a 10-bedroom mansion on Miami’s Star Island for $32.5 million in 2020, according to WSJ

The exclusive island, which is located in Biscayne Bay, is known to attract A-list residents.

<p>Kevin Mazur/Getty</p> Alex Rodriguez and Jennifer Lopez
Alex Rodriguez and Jennifer Lopez

Malibu

Lopez and Rodriguez, who ended their engagement the following April, put their Malibu fixer-upper on the market in July 2020.

They listed the five-bedroom, four-and-a-half bathroom oceanfront home for $7.99 million, after having purchased it from Entourage actor Jeremy Piven for $6.6 million in February 2019, according to the L.A.Times.

The home, spanning more than 4,400 square feet of living space over three levels, is in the heart of Malibu, with over 50 feet of private beachfront. It features walls of glass and expansive terraces on each level overlooking the Pacific Ocean.

In March 2019, shortly after the couple bought the property, home renovation star Joanna Gaines visited the couple there and was photographed with a film crew on the beach outside. A source told PEOPLE at the time that Gaines was considering helping Lopez and Rodriguez remodel the home.

It sold for $6.775 million, less than two months later, according to the Journal.

<p>Barry Winiker/Getty</p> A block featuring luxury stores in the Hamptons
A block featuring luxury stores in the Hamptons

Hamptons

In 2013, Lopez dropped $10 million on a three-acre Hamptons property on New York’s Long Island, according to Forbes. The 8-bedroom, 7.5 bathroom home includes a pool, pool house, theater, sauna, steam room and covered porches.

Hidden Hills

Lopez bought this sprawling California estate in 2010 for $8.2 million, and completely renovated it during her time there, according to the Los Angeles Times. She sold it for $10 million in 2017.

Some of its highlights included formal and informal living rooms, a primary suite with a sitting room and a private terrace, dance and recording studios, a 20-seat theater, a game room, a speakeasy-style bar and a resort-style swimming pool.

<p>Kevin Mazur/Getty</p> Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony
Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony

Long Island

Lopez lived in a Brookville, Long Island, mansion when she was married to Marc Anthony, between 2004 and 2014.

“It was the place they brought their kids up,” Douglas Elliman vice chair Dottie Herman told ABC News, referring to Max and Emme, the twins Lopez and Anthony welcomed in 2008. “It’s hard to believe with J.Lo and Marc Anthony that they were regular people, but their kids and them had a normal life in a wonderful place that they felt was their home.”

The home was listed for $9 million in 2015, and according to Newsday, sold for $4.5 million in 2017.

Georgia

Affleck purchased an 87-acre property on Hampton Island Preserve outside Savannah, Georgia, as a getaway in 2003, reportedly paying $7.11 million for it, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The compound, which includes three houses, river access and a dock complex, served as the site of wedding celebrations Affleck and Lopez held with friends and family in August 2022, a month after getting married in Las Vegas.

The pair had “an extraordinary weekend of celebrations planned,” leading up to their second wedding, including “a pre-wedding party, a ceremony and … lots of fun lined up,” a source told PEOPLE at the time.

<p>Frank Peters/Getty</p> Miami skyline
Miami skyline

Miami

According to Forbes, Lopez owned a 1929 waterfront property on Biscayne Bay until selling it in 2005 to businessman Mark Gainor, who renovated the home. The 1.2-acre property included seven bedrooms, nine and a half baths and Miami skyline views.

In 2015, Phil Collins paid $33 million for the property.

The Summit

According to Trulia, Lopez owned a Los Angeles mansion called The Summit from 2000 to 2004. Gwen Stefani purchased the seven-bedroom, seven-and-a-half-bath residence with Gavin Rossdale in 2006 and sold it for $21,650,000 in 2019.

Features touted in the listing included an infinity pool, playground, chicken coop, lighted tennis court and expansive outdoor living spaces.

Is love just great the third, fourth and fifth time around???

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 18, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION LAMENTS THAT THE EXPERTS WHO ARE RUNNING THE COUNTRY WILL BE FIRED IF TRUMP WINS…

ONLY DEMOCRATS AND THEIR EXPERTS CAN BE RELIED UPON TO RUN THE COUNTRY CLAIMS THE CURRENT CROP OF EXPERTS!

Washington Post Warning: If Trump Wins, We’ll No Longer Have the “Experts” in Charge

Like the weirdos appointed by the Biden administration…?

 
WaPo Warning: If Trump Wins, We’ll No Longer Have the “Experts” in Charge

“I would rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the telephone directory,” wrote the late William F. Buckley in 1961, “than by the Harvard University faculty.” It might be wise bearing this in mind in light of the warning just issued by The Washington Post:

If Trump is reelected, states the paper’s Karen Tumulty, he’s going to rob us of “Harvard-faculty governance.”

That’s putting it figuratively, of course. What Tumulty actually wrote is that Trump would “replace the professionalized civil service of today” with “a government of amateurs.”

In a Monday piece titled “Trump wants a government of amateurs — accountable only to him,” the philosophically tumultuous Tumulty opines:

Give him this: He has made no secret of his intention to kick over a host of institutions with that vision in mind if voters decide to give him a do-over in the White House. One plan that hasn’t gotten nearly enough attention, however, is Trump’s desire to replace the professionalized civil service of today with his own version of the 19th-century “spoils system.”

He’s already tried. Near the end of his presidency, Trump issued an executive order making it possible for him to fire tens of thousands of civil servants in policy making positions and to install political allies in their places. It was to be done through a newly created status known as “Schedule F.”

… Trump would move quickly to reinstate Schedule F — and, no doubt, broaden it — if he is reelected.

Of course, another way of saying “kick over a host of institutions” is “drain the swamp” — which is precisely what many voters want.

Moreover, Tumulty’s claim is comical, notes commentator Jack Hellner. “I am having trouble locating the principled professionals hired by Biden,” he wrote Wednesday, “who also disagree with Biden and his radical policies, because as I see it, Biden hires are the epitome of ‘political allies.’” For sure — they operate as a hive mind.

But Tumulty isn’t alone in revving up the laugh meter. In a Politico “Playbook” interview last weekend that Hellner quips could pass for a Babylon Bee piece, Kamala Harris criticized Trump for selecting running-mate short-list choices who all support him and his policies. My, what a radical. She claimed Trump just wanted an “enabler.”

Of course, the immediate question to Harris from a conscientious media would’ve been: “If that’s how it’s meant to be, would you please name a few issues or policies on which you disagree with Joe Biden?”

She would’ve stammered and sputtered worse than journalist Francesca Fiorentini did recently when pressed to explain what “crime” Trump was convicted of in New York.

Mentioning that appointing people who’ll advance your agenda is what all presidents do, Hellner went on to illustrate that dissent is wholly absent in the Biden administration. This is obvious, though. More interesting is a deeper issue.

That is, what does “professionalism” or “expert” status really denote?

Being a “professional” simply means that a person does something as a profession; it doesn’t guarantee competence. Why, in the early days of golf and tennis, for instance, the “amateurs” often surpassed the “pros” (e.g., Bobby Jones in golf).

Of course, we’d hope that doing something as a career would yield true expertise, but is this always so?

Question: How many Supreme Court decisions are 5-4? Many. So while all nine justices are supposedly juridical experts extraordinaire, in some cases they’re split as close to 50-50 as possible.

Will the real experts please stand up?

This isn’t unusual. On many if not most issues — and all controversial ones — you’ll find “experts” on both sides. The only exception is when the issue has more than two sides; then there are experts on all of them. To which “experts” do you listen?

Making this determination even more difficult is that even brilliance doesn’t immunize one against gross error. Just consider that “Albert Einstein predicted: ‘There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will,’” related late Professor Walter E. Williams in 2017.

“In 1899, Charles H. Duell, the U.S. commissioner of patents, said, ‘Everything that can be invented has been invented,’” Williams continued. “Listening to its experts in 1936, The New York Times predicted, ‘A rocket will never be able to leave the Earth’s atmosphere.’” (Williams provided numerous other examples, too.)

Experts become more errant still when government gets involved. As Williams’ college mentor, economist Milton Friedman, pointed out when contrasting the market with top-down control, government hires are appointed based on “political self-interest.” Ergo, keeping their jobs depends on deferring to political imperatives, not expertise-oriented ones.

A good example is Covid, about which government “experts” — whose prescriptions were most errant — routinely contradicted private-sector experts. Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski explained the disagreement simply in 2020. “Well, I’m not paid by the government,” he said, “so I’m entitled to actually do science.”

As for Biden’s “experts,” what have they wrought? A short list:

  • Alejandro Mayorkas, the secretary of Homeland Security, will not secure the homeland and seal the border.
  • Pete Buttigieg, the secretary of Transportation, photo with his HUSBAND, knows little about transportation and is most famous for being homosexual and talking about “racist roads.”
  • Sam Brinton, ex-Office of Nuclear Energy official, is best known for dressing like a woman (an androgynous alien, actually) and stealing luggage.
  • Sam Brinton photo
  • “Rachel” Levine, U.S. assistant secretary for health, is a man who masquerades as a woman and advocates “transgenderism” for children..

Be warned, too: Reelecting Trump means sacrificing this kind of expertise.

And now we can understand why the ancient Athenians chose their “representatives” based on lot, saying they wanted common men in the roles and not “professional politicians.”

As for Trump, why wouldn’t his and his supporters’ focus be on cleaning house? Remember when The New York Times published a 2018 piece on the “resistance inside the Trump administration,” written by a self-professed member of the “steady state” (aka the “deep state”)? The MAGA movement is not mainly about Trump, but concerns transforming government.

In conclusion, it shouldn’t be surprising that Trump would demand at least a modicum of the total loyalty Biden receives from the (hopefully no longer) permanent bureaucracy.

Well, strike that: It may be surprising to certain “experts” on government and “professionals” specializing in human behavior.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 18, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

OBAMAS’ SELLING THEIR MANSION!

Get a Glimpse Inside the Obamas’ $12M Waterfront Mansion


peek-inside-the-obamas-12m-waterfront-estate_23

The Obamas recently invested $12 million in their new residence on Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts. This waterfront estate spans 29 acres and features 7 bedrooms, 8 bathrooms, and a refreshing outdoor swimming pool. Let’s explore its interior!\

The Living Room

peek-inside-the-obamas-12m-waterfront-estate_24

Step into this granite-stone mansion and be wowed by a huge living room. The vaulted ceiling and exposed beams make it look grand, but the cozy orange lights add a warm, homey touch.

The Kitchen

peek-inside-the-obamas-12m-waterfront-estate_25

The nearby open kitchen boasts a sleek, modern aesthetic, with its silver and creamy white color palette. And who doesn’t appreciate a well-stocked kitchen cabinet?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 14, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

FOOD IS CONTROLLED BY VERY RICH FAMILIES

Meet the uber-wealthy families who control much of the food system in the US and Australia

A pink pig, backlit, looks straight on at the camera, which is zoomed in on its face.
From pig farming to grain transportation, Austin Frerick has been examining the intersection of food production and monopolies. (Reuters: Daniel Acker)

Austin Frerick’s interest in mega-rich farmers began in 2018, while he was perched on a stool in a hipster dive bar in Iowa during a competitive local political campaign.

The author got chatting to someone in the bar who told him the biggest campaign contributors were a couple of Iowa hog farmers named Jeff and Deb Hansen.

Frerick was struck by this and what these farmers symbolized.

“The most politically powerful person right now in the state is a hog farmer,” Frerick tells ABC RN’s Late Night Live.

And he wondered how one farmer could come to amass and sell more than 5 million pigs each year.

Frerick is a fellow of Yale’s Thurman Arnold Project, which researches competition policy and antitrust enforcement. Recently he published Barons: Money, Power, and the Corruption of America’s Food Industry.

After that conversation at the bar, Frerick realised that what was happening in the pork industry — this huge consolidation of power and wealth — was happening throughout the US food system.

When he started investigating, he found that a handful of US families controlled most of the US’s food production and distribution system, including meat, dairy, grains, fruit and groceries.

While some have recognisable names, most are private individuals running private companies. All are worth billions of dollars.

And while their influence is evident in the US, it stretches around the world — and that includes Australia.

How did these farmers become so powerful?

The history of American agriculture is rooted in slavery and genocide but it was in the 1980s that the pro-corporate framework really took hold , Frerick says.

Young white man wearing blue collared shirt

Austin Frerick is an expert on agricultural and antitrust policy who’s encouraging Americans to take back the power from food barons.(Supplied: Austin Frerick)

With the election of Republican president Ronald Reagan, Frerick says that “the guardrails came off and you see this massive consolidation of power in the hands of a few people”.

In the 1950s, then-president Dwight D Eisenhower’s secretary of agriculture urged farmers to “get big or get out”, and succeeded in passing a bill that watered down laws protecting small family-run farms.

Reagan continued to water down this legislation.

Frerick says this meant his home state of Iowa, which had some of the best soil in North America, was transformed into an industrial wasteland.

“It’s empty, it’s dead, it’s barren — you don’t see animals, you smell them,” he says.

For example, in Iowa, pigs currently outnumber people seven to one.

“We basically shove most animals into these massive sheds called confinements, where they never see a blade of grass.”

He says where Iowa used to be made up of independent, middle-class family farms, it is now mostly families of low-wage workers employed by the mega-rich and often out-of-town agricultural barons.

And Frerick believes these mega-rich baron families have one thing in common which led to their success.

“They were willing to cross ethical lines others weren’t willing to cross. [For instance] most hog farmers weren’t willing to pack thousands of their animals into a windless metal shed,” he says.

So who exactly are the families that own so much of the agricultural industry?

The hog barons: Jeff and Deb Hansen

Via their Iowa Select Farms pork production company, the Hansens own 800 farms in 50 counties in Iowa. That makes them the fourth largest pork producer in the US. Iowa Select Farms’ revenue from 2022 was $91 million.

Frerick learnt that the Hansens live between their home in the only gated community in Iowa and a home in Naples, Florida.

“[And] they have their own private jet that they fly back and forth between the two and allegedly on this jet are the words ‘When pigs fly’, ” Frerick says.

The grain barons: The Cargill-MacMillan family

Frerick says he grew up aware of the company owned by the Cargill-MacMillan family.

“I played soccer next to a Cargill plant, I went to church by a Cargill plant, but [the family is] not consumer-facing, they don’t put their name on anything,” he says.

So, he never realised the scale of the operation.

The family owns equity in the food company Cargill Inc, one of the largest privately owned corporations in the US, with branches around the world, including Australia.

According to Forbes, 21 of the Cargill-MacMillian family members are billionaires.

Yet despite their reach, Frerick says the family aims to keep a low profile.

“[For example] they’re still in Russia, they don’t care about Putin because you don’t know who they are and so you can’t boycott [them],” he says.

A wheat crop

Cargill is in the business of transporting grain, and is likely one of the biggest privately owned companies you’ve never heard of.(ABC Rural: Jane McNaughton)

“They want to be in every grain production region in the world and they want to shape those markets to their personal benefit.”

Frerick says the other advantage of the family’s anonymity is that “it’s actually really, really hard to find out what they own, how much they own, where they operate”.

And how they operate.

In 2022, the president of the New South Wales Farmers Association, Xavier Martin was critical of the way “multinational middleman” like Cargill treat NSW grain growers.

“There’s a heck of a lot of farmers who’ve had an absolute belting and then find they’ve got a hundred-tonne gorilla … completely mugging them at the market,” Mr Martin said.

The dairy barons: Mike and Sue McCloskey

Select Milk Producers, the sixth largest milk co-operative in America, is owned by Mike and Sue McCloskey.

The couple started their own dairy in California with just 250 cows, but they’ve since moved their operation to New Mexico and Indiana. And now their co-operative is an operation with 35,000 cows.

Beyond dairy farming, Frerick says the pair are also involved in American politics.

“The dairy [barons] were very early supporters of [Trump]; they gave him a massive amount of money,” the author says.

In 2016, following the election of Donald Trump, Mike McCloskey was considered for the role of US secretary of agriculture, but was not appointed to the role.

While their farming operation is based in north-west Indiana, the McCloskeys claim residency at the Ritz-Carlton in Puerto Rico, Frerick says.

The grocery barons: The Waltons family

“They’re the largest company we’ve ever seen in the food system in the history of mankind,” Frerick says.

The Waltons, the owners of Walmart, are unsurprisingly America’s richest family, and Frerick describes them as the “king of kings”.

Frerick says a Walmart supplier once described their relationship to the grocery monolith as “it’s supply and command … they dictate you”.

The berry barons: The Driscolls

It’s easy to find berry brand Driscoll in Australian supermarkets, but the company is headquartered in California.

Brothers J Miles and Garland Reiter founded the company in the late 1800s, and the company now sells one in three berries in the world.

Yet Frerik says: “They don’t grow a single berry.”

He says companies like Driscoll often contract out their production to people in other countries who can engage in labour practices that would not generally be accepted in developed countries.

A 2022 Guardian investigation found that berry farm workers in Portugal appear to have been working illegally long hours picking berries for less than minimum wage.

Some of the berry farms identified in the investigation supply berries to European supermarkets through Driscolls.

Frerick explains the creation of the supermarket baron Walmart led to the offshoot of “parent” barons.

He adds: “That’s how Driscolls became a baron … they realise one company wants four berries for 4,000 stores year round,” he says.

“And so what you see is massive consolidation in the food system.”

The beef barons: The Batista family

The billionaire Brazilian Batista brothers, Joesley and Wesley, own JBS Foods, one of the world’s largest meat processing companies.

This company has been heavily involved in political influence.

In 2020, top executives of the company pleaded guilty to bribing more than 1,900 Brazilian politicians to advance their business interests.

The company was fined yet, as Frerick explains, the brothers “kept their monopoly”.

A truck with the name 'JBS Carriers' on it, drives on a road in a regional area.

Joesley Batista has mainly orchestrated JBS’s global acquisition spree, buying up competitors while expanding its supply chain.(ABC: Four Corners/Ryan Sheridan)

In Australia, JBS is the country’s largest meat and food processing company, employing more than 14,000 workers across 50 sites.

You might not know the name JBS. But if you buy Primo ham, McDonald’s burgers or meat from Coles, Woolworths or Aldi, you’re likely eating JBS products.

Recently, JBS expanded into fish farming in Tasmania, acquiring Huon Aquaculture, a major salmon producer sold around Australian and exported globally.

Where to from here?

Frerick would like to see the US return to sustainable, independent farming practices because he believes the current food system in America is “truly radical” given the size and scale of these current farming enterprises.

“Honestly, the simplest thing is to put animals back on the land,” he says.

“We have to end this industrial model; it’s better for rural communities, better for the environment [and] it makes better tasting food.”

Agriculture is a major contributor of emissions and as the world deals with a deepening climate crisis, Frerick says the American food system needs to change.

“You have industrial dairy occurring in the West and aquifers that cannot sustain them, that are just awful for the cows and awful for the workers.”

Frerick says it all comes down to political will.

“You just have to break [these companies] up. This isn’t hard,  it’s more about the question of political courage.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 14, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

ZOMBIE COMPANIES…LOADED WITH DEBT AND DEAD!

Zombies: Ranks of world’s most debt-hobbled companies are soaring, and not all will survive

NEW YORK (AP) — They are called zombies, companies so laden with debt that they are just stumbling by on the brink of survival, barely able to pay even the interest on their loans and often just a bad business hit away from dying off for good.

An Associated Press analysis found their numbers have soared to nearly 7,000 publicly traded companies around the world — 2,000 in the United States alone — whiplashed by years of piling up cheap debt followed by stubborn inflation that has pushed borrowing costs to decade highs.

And now many of these mostly small and mid-sized walking wounded could soon be facing their day of reckoning, with due dates looming on hundreds of billions of dollars of loans they may not be able to pay back.

“They’re going to get crushed,” Valens Securities Managing Director Robert Spivey said of the weakest zombies.
Added Miami investor Mark Spitznagel, who famously bet against stocks before the last two crashes: “The clock is ticking.”

Zombies are commonly defined as companies that have failed to make enough money from operations in the past three years to pay even the interest on their loans. AP’s analysis found their ranks in raw numbers have jumped over the past decade by a third or more in Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the U.S., including companies that run Carnival Cruise Line, JetBlue Airways, Wayfair, Peloton, Italy’s Telecom Italia and British soccer giant Manchester United.

An Associated Press analysis found the number of publicly-traded “zombie” companies — those so laden with debt they’re struggling to pay even the interest on their loans — has soared to nearly 7,000 around the world, including 2,000 in the United States.
Takeaways from AP analysis on the rise of world’s debt-laden ‘zombie’ companies
FILE – Trader Michael Milano, center, works with colleagues on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on May 30, 2024. World stocks are mixed on Friday, June 7, 2024, after a steady day on Wall Street as markets anticipate key U.S. jobs data to be revealed later in the day.

To be sure, the number of companies, in general, has increased over the past decade, making comparisons difficult, but even limiting the analysis to companies that existed a decade ago, zombies have jumped nearly 30%.

They include utilities, food producers, tech companies, owners of hospitals and nursing home chains whose weak finances hobbled their responses in the pandemic, and real estate firms struggling with half-empty office buildings in the heart of major cities.
As the number of zombies has grown, so too has the potential damage if they are forced to file for bankruptcy or close their doors permanently. Companies in the AP’s analysis employ at least 130 million people in a dozen countries.

Already, the number of U.S. companies going bankrupt has hit a 14-year high, a surge expected in a recession, not an expansion. Corporate bankruptcies have also recently hit highs of nearly a decade or more in Canada, the U.K., France and Spain.

Some experts say zombies may be able to avoid layoffs, selloffs of business units or collapse if central banks cut interest rates, which the European Central Bank began doing this week, though scattered defaults and bankruptcies could still drag on the economy. Others think the pandemic inflated the ranks of zombies and the impact is temporary.

“Revenue went down, or didn’t grow as much as projected, but that doesn’t mean they are all about to go bust,” said Martin Fridson, CEO of research firm FridsonVision High Yield Strategy.

For its part, Wall Street isn’t panicking. Investors have been buying stock of some zombies and their “junk bonds,” loans rating agencies deem most at risk of default. While that may help zombies raise cash in the short term, investors pouring money into these securities and pushing up their prices could eventually face heavy losses.

“We have people gambling in the public markets at an unprecedented level,” said David Trainer, head of New Constructs, an investment research group that tracks the cash drain on zombies. “They don’t see risk.”
WARNING SIGNS

Credit rating agencies and economists warned about the dangers of companies piling on debt for years as interest rates fell but got a big push when central banks around the world cut benchmark rates to near zero in the 2009 financial crisis and then again in the 2020-21 pandemic.

It was a giant, unprecedented experiment designed to spark a borrowing binge that would help avert a worldwide depression. It also created what some economists saw as a credit bubble that spread far beyond zombies, with low rates that also enticed heavy borrowing by governments, consumers and bigger, healthier companies.

The difference for many zombies is they lack deep cash reserves, and the interest they pay on many of their loans is variable, not fixed, so higher rates are hurting them right now. Most dangerously, zombie debt was often not used to expand, hire or invest in technology, but on buying back their own stock.

These so-called repurchases allow companies to “retire” shares, or take them off the market, a way to make up for new shares often created to boost the pay and retention packages for CEOs and other top executives.

But too many stock buybacks can drain cash from a business, which is what happened at Bed Bath & Beyond. The retail chain that once operated 1,500 stores struggled for years with a troubled transition to digital sales and other problems, but its heavy borrowing and decision to spend $7 billion in a decade on buybacks played a key role in its downfall.

Those buybacks came amid big paydays for top management, which Bed Bath & Beyond said in regulatory filings were intended to align with financial performance. Pay for just three top executives topped $140 million, according to executive data firm Equilar, even as its stock sunk from $80 to zero. Tens of thousands of workers in all 50 states lost their jobs as the chain spiraled to its bankruptcy filing last year.

Companies had a chance to cut their debt after then-President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax overhaul slashed corporate rates and allowed repatriation of profits overseas. But most of the windfall was spent on buybacks instead. Over the next two years, U.S. companies spent a record $1.3 trillion repurchasing and retiring their own stock, a 50% jump from the prior two years.

SmileDirectClub went from spending a little over $1 million a year on buying its own stock before the tax cut to spending $780 million as it boosted pay packages of top executives. One former CEO got $20 million in just four years. Stock in the heavily indebted teeth-straightening company plunged before it went out of business last year and put 2,700 people out of work.

“I was like, ‘How did this ever happen?’” said George Pettigrew, who held a tech job at the company’s Nashville, Tennessee, headquarters. ”I was shocked at the amount of the debt.”

Another zombie, JetBlue, suffered problems felt by many airlines, including the lingering impact of lost business during the pandemic. But it also was hurt by the decision to double its debt in the past decade and purchase hundreds of millions of dollars of its own stock. As interest costs soared and profits evaporated, that stock has dropped by two-thirds, and JetBlue has not made enough in pre-tax earnings to pay $717 million in interest over four straight years.

JetBlue said the AP’s way of screening for zombies isn’t accurate for airlines because big purchases of aircraft “are an intrinsic part of the business model” and don’t reflect an airline’s true health. The company added that it’s been shoring up its finances recently by cutting costs and putting off purchases of new planes. JetBlue also hasn’t done a major stock buyback in four years.

In some cases, borrowed cash has gone straight into the pockets of controlling shareholders and wealthy family owners.

In Britain, the Glazer family that owns much of the Premier League’s Manchester United soccer franchise loaded up the company with debt in 2005, then got the team to borrow hundreds of millions a few years later. At the same time, the family had the team pay dividends to shareholders, including $165 million to the Glazers themselves, while its stadium, the Old Trafford, fell into disrepair.

“They’ve papered over the cracks but we’ve been in decline for more than a decade,” fan lobbying group head Chris Rumfitt said after a recent downpour sent water cascading from the upper stands in what spectators dubbed “Trafford Falls.” “There have been zero investments in infrastructure.”

The Glazers, who separately own the NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers, recently brought in a new part owner at Manchester United who has promised to inject $300 million into the business. The stock is falling anyway, down 20% so far this year to $16.25, no higher than it was a decade ago.

Manchester United declined to comment.

Zombie collapses wouldn’t be so scary if robust spending by governments, consumers and larger, more stable companies could act as a cushion. But they also piled up debt.

The U.S. government is expected to spend $870 billion this year on interest on its debt alone, up a third in a year and more than it spends on defense. In South Korea, consumers are tapped out as credit card and other household debt hit fresh records. In the U.K., homeowners are missing payments on their mortgages at a rate not seen in years.

A real concern among investors is that too many zombies could collapse at the same time because central banks kept them on life support with low interest rates for years instead of allowing failures to sprinkle out over time, similar to the way allowing small forest fires to burn dry brush helps prevent an inferno.

“They’ve created a tinderbox,” said Spitznagel, founder of Universa Investments. “Any wildfire now threatens the entire ecosystem.”
TIME RUNNING OUT?

For the first few months of this year, hundreds of zombies refinanced their loans as lenders opened their wallets in anticipation that the Federal Reserve would start cutting in March. That new money helped stocks of more than 1,000 zombies in AP’s analysis rise 20% or more in the past six months across the dozen countries.

But many did not or could not refinance, and time is running out.

Through the summer and into September, when many investors now expect the first and only Fed cut this year, zombies will have to pay off $1.1 trillion of loans, according to AP’s analysis, two-thirds of the total due by the end of the year.

For its calculations, the AP used pre-tax, pre-interest earnings of publicly-traded companies from the database FactSet for both years it studied, 2023 and 2013. The countries selected were the biggest by gross domestic product: the U.S., China, Japan, India, Germany, the U.K., France, Canada, South Korea, Spain, Italy and Australia.

The study did not take into account cash in the bank that a company could use to pay its bills or assets it could sell to raise money. The results would also vary if other years were used due to economic conditions and interest rate policies. Still, studies by both the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements, an organization for central banks in Switzerland, generally support AP’s findings that zombies have risen sharply.

Most of the publicly traded companies in the countries studied — 80% of 34,000 total — are not zombies. These healthier companies tend to be bigger with more cash, and many have reinvested it in higher-yielding bonds and other assets to make up for the higher interest payments now. Many also took advantage of pandemic-era low rates to refinance, pushing out repayment due dates into the future.

But the debt hasn’t gone away, and could become a problem for these companies as well if rates don’t fall over the next few years. In 2026, $586 billion in debt is coming due for the companies in the S&P 1500.

“They aren’t on anyone’s radar yet, but they are a hurricane. They could be a Category 4 or Category 5 if interest rates don’t go down,” Valens Securities’ Spivey said. “They’re going to lay people off. They’re going to have to cut costs.”

Some zombies aren’t waiting.

Telecom Italia struck a deal last year to sell its landline network but debt fears continue to push down its stock, so it has moved to put its subsea telecom unit and cell tower business up for sale, too.

Radio giant iHeartMedia, after exiting bankruptcy five years ago with less debt, is still struggling to pay what it owes by unloading real estate and radio towers. Its stock has fallen from $16.50 to $1.10 in five years.

Exercise company Peloton Interactive has laid off hundreds of workers to help pay debt that has more than quadrupled to $2.3 billion in just five years even though its pretax earnings before the new borrowing weren’t enough to pay interest. Stock that had soared to more than $170 a share during the pandemic recently closed at $3.74.

“If rates stay at this level in the near future, we’re going to see more bankruptcies,” said George Cipolloni, a fund manager at Penn Mutual Asset Management. “At some point the money comes due and they’re not going to have it. It’s game over.”
___

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 14, 2024 by sterlingcooper.

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • CRYPTO SCHEMES CONTINUE TO STEAL BILLIONS!
  • COLOR CODED WOKE NEW ENGLAND AREAS AND BONUS FOR NEW YORK, CLEVELAND AND CHICAGO ENJOY THE HILARITY
  • THE MOST SECURE FLORIDA HOMESTEAD IS NOT ON ANY BEACH
  • BABY BOOMERS ARE RICHEST GENERATION WITH $85 TRILLION IN ASSETS
  • FRAUDULENT COMMERCIAL DRIVER LICENSES ISSUED BY CALIFORNIA ARE BEING CANCELLED!

Sterling Cooper, Inc. © 2023,  Privacy Policy