Welcome to Sterling Cooper, Inc.
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
LOGO
  • INCREASE YOUR REVENUES
    50%-100% - FREE EVALUATION
  • WEF 2025 GLOBAL
    RISKS REPORT
  • CAPITAL GAINS
    TAX DEFERRED
  • INCORPORATE
    NOW FOR $39
  • RESEARCH
    REPORTS
  • ENGULF &
    DEVOUR
  • Home
  • Services
    • Selling a Business
    • Buying a Business
    • Public Relation
    • Cooper consulting
    • Advertising
    • Publishing
    • Web and IT Services
    • Loans
  • Seller
  • buyer
  • Advertising
  • Publishing
  • M&A Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • Contact
LOGO

WOKE AND OVERPAID CEO OF GM FINALLY EMBRACES GASOLINE POWERED CARS AFTER LOSING BILLION FOR STOCKHOLDERS ON STUPID WOKE POLICIES, SUCH AS MAJORITY WOMEN DIRECTORS AND EV MANDATES

The Wall Street Journal

An electric-vehicle charging location in Oceanside, Calif.

Why General Motors Boss Mary Barra Is Slamming the Brakes on Lofty EV Ambitions

Falling consumer demand and shriveling government support undermine GM’s all-electric plans

Not long ago, Chief Executive Mary Barra declared that General Motors GM was a decade away from quitting gas-powered cars, setting the course for a new mission, one that would safeguard the planet for generations.

THE DUMB MOVE COST GM AND STOCKHOLDERS BILLIONS AND BILLIONS! SHE ENTERTAINED THE DODDERING OLD FOOL JOE BIDEN WITH HIM SITTING IN AN ELECTRIC SOMETHING OR OTHER.

And by the way, why does Mary DRESS LIKE JENSEN HUANG ??? They both have the same outfit all black leather???

“We have an opportunity and frankly a responsibility to create a better future,” Barra said in a 2022 speech. She promised to launch 30 electric-vehicle models globally within a few years and, soon after, convert more than half of GM’s North American plants to EV production.

Her ambitious quest to command new markets and save the Earth has since stalled. GM has gone from one of the industry’s loudest EV champions to a leading opponent of government emissions rules and fuel-economy standards that for decades fueled the consumer market for cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Many car companies, faced with softening EV sales and a Trump administration hostile to green-energy initiatives, have called for looser regulations. None has backtracked as quickly and dramatically as GM.

“GM sold us out. Mary Barra sold us out,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said at a recent news conference. He was still fuming over GM’s successful campaign to help strip the state of its authority to set clean-air regulations more strict than the rest of the nation.

GM CEO Mary Barra next to the Chevrolet Bolt EV electric car.

CEO Mary Barra showing the Bolt EV in 2016. Photo: Gregory Bull/Associated Press

The Detroit-based automaker this year has spent more to lobby the federal government than any company other than Meta, using much of the money going to fight clean-air and fuel-economy rules. GM’s $11.5 million in reported spending through June is nearly double Toyota’s tally and roughly six times that of Ford’s.

One GM lobbyist called the office of Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) earlier this year to support his efforts to weaken 50-year-old federal fuel-economy rules that over the years significantly reduced fuel consumption and emissions, as well as helped birth such cars as Toyota’s Prius.

Congress added Cruz’s measure to the Big Beautiful Bill, eliminating fines for automakers, including GM, whose fleets fall short of Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards.

This spring, thousands of GM white-collar employees received emails saying, “We need your help!” The email urged them to call lawmakers to oppose stricter auto-emission standards in California and 17 other states, as well as Washington, D.C. The strict limits would have essentially barred the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035.

While GM says it remains invested in EVs, Barra has stopped referencing her own 2035 target to produce only EVs, saying instead that the transition will take decades. In a July letter to shareholders, she assured them that GM is well positioned to succeed in a market for internal-combustion engines “that now has a longer runway.” Barra is touting GM’s multibillion-dollar investments in V-8 engines, gasoline-powered pickups and SUVs, while nixing plans for factories to make EVs and the batteries to power them.

The change is a practical move that reflects the poor performance of the once-booming EV market, according to Barra. U.S. sales across the industry are expected to plunge after Sept. 30, when a $7,500 federal tax credit for EV buyers expires.

President Trump talks with auto industry leaders like GM CEO Mary Barra and UAW President Dennis Williams, with an American flag and cars in the background.

President Trump, center, speaking in 2017 to General Motors CEO Mary Barra in Ypsilanti Township, Mich. Photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

“What we’re committed to is the customer,” she said about the shift during a Wall Street Journal event in May. “The customer was telling us they weren’t ready.”

Electric vehicles accounted for roughly 4% of the 2.7 million cars GM sold last year. So far this year, EVs made up about 6% of GM car sales, spurred by new models and a looming end to the federal tax rebates.

The automaker’s lobbying aims to correct an unrealistic regulatory timeline, given that “the consumer wasn’t ready to go as fast as the rest of us were,” said GM director Jonathan McNeill, a former top executive at Tesla and Lyft. Barra remains committed to EVs, he said.

The automaker has expanded its U.S. EV lineup from 2016 through this year to about a dozen models—more than any of its competitors—and sales have more than doubled this year. It also lobbied on behalf of measures that foster EV production in the U.S., the company said, including federal tax credits for buyers, more charging stations and federal support for projects to mine and process minerals used in EV battery production.

Barra, GM’s leader since 2014, said she learned from the company’s rocky relationship with President Trump during his first term. This year, GM voiced support for Trump’s tariffs—despite higher costs for foreign-made components and vehicles—and has praised administration efforts to expand U.S. manufacturing.

Trump, a critic of global efforts to address climate change, said during his United Nations address last week that it was “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.”

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm (red dress) driving a Chevy Volt electric vehicle with auto workers and dignitaries marching behind holding signs that say "WE'RE ELECTRIC" and "HERE TO STAY".

The Detroit launch of the Chevy Volt in 2009. Photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Starting line

GM’s first electric car, the EV1 sedan, was sold for three years before GM discontinued it in 1999 because of high-production costs and tepid demand. A decade later, desperate for an answer to Toyota’s successful Prius hybrid—and mindful of an upstart competitor named Tesla—GM launched the Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid. It was another money loser and discontinued in 2019.

In November 2020, Barra pledged to roll out more than 20 new EVs in North America by 2025. To accomplish that, GM would spend $27 billion. Engineers would rely on a one-size-fits all battery system, developed through a tie-up with South Korea’s LG and intended to bring down vehicle prices. Plans included electric versions of its pickups and SUVs.

Not everyone was on board with the speed and scope of Barra’s vision, people familiar with the situation said. Some GM executives, particularly in sales, fretted the company was tilting too far, too fast toward EVs. Barra, frustrated by GM getting cast as an industry laggard, told them to get on board.

Chelsea Sexton, 29, hugs Paul Scott, 52, during a vigil protesting General Motors plans to crush EV1 electric vehicles.

A demonstration outside a GM training center in Burbank, Calif., to protest company plans to crush around 70 EV1 electric vehicles in 2005. Photo: Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

Barra set EV model sales targets, saying the company and its engineers would be more successful if they were under the gun, the people familiar said. We don’t want to be disrupted, we need to disrupt ourselves, Barra has said inside and outside the company.

In January 2021, Barra showcased the company’s EV business at CES, the tech industry’s pre-eminent annual show. She pledged to spend billions, aided by government funds, to convert factories making gas-powered engines and vehicles to churn out EVs and batteries.

New models ranged from an EV version of GM’s small Equinox SUV to the king-size Hummer EV that carried a six-figure sticker price.

The company’s stock surged to its highest level in a decade. By the end of the 2021, it was up nearly 50% to record highs.

In reverse

For a while, workers at a GM factory on the border of Detroit and Hamtramck, Mich., nicknamed D-Ham, looked like winners. The plant churned out gas-powered Cadillacs, Chevys and, for a time, the electric Volt, before almost shutting down in 2020.

GM picked D-Ham to be the manufacturing heart of its new EV push. The 40-year-old facility was revamped and renamed to Factory Zero, referencing GM’s lofty pursuit of zero crashes and zero emissions.

In late 2021, the first Hummer EV pickup rolled off the line. All-electric versions of the Chevrolet Silverado pickup, Cadillac Escalade SUV and others followed. The plant’s union local held an event that allowed members to take the $100,000 trucks for a spin.

Three years later, evidence of the industry’s overblown EV expectations were impossible to ignore. Dealers were stuck with unsold EVs, prices of used models plummeted. Even Tesla reported shrinking sales.

TeslaGM

2020’250100200300400500600700 thousand

This January, Trump promised in his inaugural address to end mandates that new cars sold in the U.S. be emission-free. Three months later, GM laid off 200 of Factory Zero’s 4,000 workers, citing slowed sales.

“We’re always in the crosshairs,” said James Cotton, president of the UAW local representing production workers there. “We’re just trying to build quality vehicles and survive.”

In spring, GM’s lobbyists and executives were negotiating with California officials over the state’s emissions mandate that in a decade would essentially allow only EVs for sale at new car dealers.

The U.S. auto industry opposed the standards. Negotiators with the California Air Resources Board offered concessions to help automakers to meet the mandate, said people familiar with the talks. The state believed the offer would satisfy GM.

The company instead was holding out for looser rules. The day before the state regulator and GM officials were to meet in March, GM said forget it. The automaker was seeking a far bigger concession: Stripping California of its authority to set such rules.

The company teamed up with California auto dealers who also opposed the new standards. Robb Hernandez, a Los Angeles-area Chevy dealer who was part of that campaign, said GM is striking a difficult but important balance.

GM produced the EV1 from 1996 to 1999 and launched the Hummer EV in 2021.

Even among his EV-friendly consumers, Hernandez said, it was apparent that people weren’t adopting the vehicles quickly enough to keep pace with state regulations. About a third of GM’s U.S. models are electric. “I’m happy where we are,” Hernandez said. “We have a foot in both camps.”

After the Senate voted in May to strip California of its authority to set its own air-emissions standards, Newsom in a news conference called GM shameful for “working behind our backs, working behind your back, and our kids’ backs.”

GM, in a statement, said that it spent 18 months negotiating with California regulators, talks that failed to produce emissions rules that bridged the gap between state requirements and the EV market.

Unplugged

GM collided with its rival Ford over another piece of EV legislation, setting off a near-revolt inside the industry trade group this spring, according to people familiar with the matter.

Ford was set to receive federal funds to help build a $3 billion EV battery factory in Marshall, Mich. The factory, like many EV battery operations in the U.S., relies on technology from a Chinese supplier to build low-cost lithium-ion batteries.

Lawmakers this year considered denying the funds because of the Chinese ties. In response, Ford wanted the trade group, the Alliance of Automotive Innovation, to encourage Congress to back the project. Given that several carmakers rely on Chinese partners to develop EVs, few expected a fight.

Top lobbyists from companies in the trade group met in March in what turned into a raucous debate over formally backing Ford. GM and its battery partner, LG, argued the federal funds should be denied. Government resources should be directed to bolstering fully domestic battery production, according to GM, which threatened to quit the group.

Assembly line workers attach an LG battery to a 2023 Chevrolet Bolt EV.

Assembly line workers attach LG batteries to Chevrolet Bolt EVs at GM’s Orion, Mich., factory in 2023. Photo: Carlos Osorio/Associated Press

Roughly a dozen attendees in a committee meeting held an informal vote. GM and LG were the sole opponents. Measures at the committee level required unanimous support to move forward, according to Alliance rules, so the idea was quashed. Later, at a full meeting, the trade group voted to change the group’s bylaws to prevent a single member from sinking a measure backed by a majority. GM’s no vote was overruled.

An Alliance spokesman said it wasn’t unusual for members to disagree. “Companies have different business models, strategies and product portfolios,” he said.

EVs are still rolling off the production lines at Factory Zero. Yet a major overhaul to convert a GM factory in Orion, Mich., to build EV trucks will instead build gas-powered ones. A New York engine factory set to be a battery plant will now make V8 engines.

Cotton, the union official at Factory Zero, said that as far as he knows, GM’s plan to go all EV by 2035 remains on track. “I just have to put my faith in what Mary is doing,” he said.

Barra said in May that consumer demand and a lack of charging stations nationwide has stalled the EV industry, but she believes the clean-running vehicles will one day replace gas-powered vehicles.

“I do believe we’ll get there,” Barra said, “because I think the vehicles are better.”

This entry was posted in Electric Cars. EV's on September 30, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

AI BEAUTIFUL ACTRESSES WILL REPLACE THE SPOILED CRY BABIES OF HOLLYWOOD FAME…FINALLY! GOODBYE TO POINTLESS MILLION DOLLAR SALARIES AND UNION MEMBERSHIP AND STRIKES!

Hollywood hits back as AI actress is hailed as ‘the next Scarlett Johannson’  BTW….”SCARLETT IS REALLY NOT PLEASANT LOOKING OR PRETTY AT ALL!”

s
Tilly Norwood (Picture: Tilly Norwood/Facebook)
This is not a real woman (Picture: Tilly Norwood/Facebook)

The woman you see above might look as real as any other human, but she’s not.

She’s actually an artificial intelligence-generated actress named Tilly Norwood who, after a short time on the scene, has sparked interest among talent agents who are keen to hire her.

As such, she’s been hailed as ‘the next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman’, sparking outrage from big names in Hollywood, who are branding it ‘gross’ and expressing rage towards the agencies who wish to sign her.

This has led to the creator of Tilly firing back, insisting that the digital actress is not a ‘replacement’ for a human being.

Taking to Instagram, comedian and technologist Eline Van der Velden wrote: ‘To those who have expressed anger over the creation of my AI character, Tilly Norwood, she is not a replacement for a human being, but a creative work – a piece of art.

‘Like many forms of art before her, she sparks conversation, and that in itself shows the power of creativity.’

Tilly Norwood Instagram 22 July 2025 tillynorwood Sat outside pretending I?m in a French film and not just avoiding my to-do list. What?s your ultimate coffee shop comfort order? #CafeCornerThoughts
Tilly Norwood is an AI-generated actress who’s already causing a stir in Hollywood (Picture: Tilly Norwood/Instagram)

Van der Velden added: ‘I see AI not as a replacement for people, but as a new tool, a new paintbrush. Just as animation, puppetry, or CGI opened fresh possibilities without taking away from live acting, AI offers another way to imagine and build stories.

‘I’m an actor myself, and nothing – certainly not an AI character – can take away the craft or joy of human performance.’

She said that ‘creating Tilly has been, for me, an act of imagination and craftsmanship, not unlike drawing a character, writing a role, or shaping a performance’.

‘It takes time, skill, and iteration to bring such a character to life,’ Van der Velden argued. ‘She represents experimentation, not substitution.

‘Much of my work has always been about holding up a mirror to society through satire, and this is no different.’

Tilly Norwood (Picture: Tilly Norwood/Facebook)
Tilly has already made her way onto Graham Norton’s sofa… sort of (Picture: Tilly Norwood/Facebook)
Tilly Norwood Actor | London | Particle6 Productions https://www.tillynorwood.com/
The creator has insisted she is not meant to replace humans (Picture: Tilly Norwood)

She also believes that ‘AI characters should be judged as part of their own genre, on their own merits’, not compared directly to human beings.

‘Each form of art has its place, and each can be valued for what it uniquely brings,’ she wrote.

Concluding on an optimistic note, the creator shared her hopes that ‘we can welcome AI as part of the wider artistic family’ and simply as ‘one more way to express ourselves, alongside theatre, film, painting, music, and countless others’.

‘When we celebrate all forms of creativity, we open doors to new voices, new stories, and new ways of connecting with each other.’

This entry was posted in FRAUDS on September 29, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

TESLA NOW OFFERS DRIVE-IN BURGERS, ROBOTS AND SUPERCHARGERS

Watch out, McDonald’s—Tesla now serves EVs, burgers, and fries. What the Tesla Diner could mean for drivers

Want fries with that? Tesla’s new diner features robots, EV charging, and all-day breakfast.

  • The Tesla Diner features 80 Supercharger stalls.
  • The unique charging location serves food and includes a drive-in theater.
  • CEO Elon Musk says the Diner is the first of many (if it proves to be successful).

Tesla is one of the most dynamic automakers in the industry, particularly when it comes to debuting innovative technology. The company produces electric vehicles and has recently launched a robotaxi service. It is also developing a humanoid robot named Optimus. Tesla has evolved into much more than just an automaker. The Tesla Diner is the latest in a long line of surprises from this clean energy and EV pioneer.

Tesla’s California diner is a retro-futuristic diner that allows patrons to charge their EVs and grab a bite, according to Eater. The diner opened its doors at 4:20 PM on July 21 and amassed a huge crowd. So, what’s the diner’s purpose and what does it serve?

What is the Tesla Diner?

The Tesla Diner offers 24/7 dining and classic diner options like burgers, fries, milkshakes, and breakfast all day long. Tesla drivers can order from their car’s infotainment systems and food is served in Cybertruck-shaped boxes.

The Tesla Diner includes a whopping 80 Supercharger stalls and solar canopies. It also features a drive-in theater component with two 45-foot screens.

Elon Musk says the innovative diner will keep improving. The Supercharger stalls at the diner are available to all North American Charging Standard-compatible electric vehicles, not just Tesla models. Additionally, the diner is open to the general public.

Are more Tesla Diner locations coming to the U.S.?

Tesla will establish similar locations in “major cities around the world” if the first location is successful, according to an X post from Musk. The CEO calls it “an island of good food, good vibes, and entertainment, all while supercharging”. It’s located at 7001 West Santa Monica Boulevard in Hollywood, California.

What does the Tesla Diner mean for the EV space?

The Tesla Diner is the “largest urban Supercharger in the world” according to an X post from the company. Tesla hosts one of the largest electric vehicle charging networks on the planet with over 70,000 global Superchargers. These chargers are capable of replenishing up to 200 miles of driving range in just 15 minutes.

Tesla’s Supercharger network has become so useful that several major automakers partnered with the company to offer Tesla Supercharger compatibility to non-Tesla EV owners. This is a net-positive for the EV space because charging infrastructure in North America has a long way to go.

Research from the Harvard Business School says that EV drivers are “dissatisfied with EV charging station pricing models”. Additionally, the research concluded that EV chargers are generally less reliable than gas stations, so Tesla’s Supercharger network addresses a major pain point for automakers looking to produce competitive EVs.

This entry was posted in TESLA INNOVATIONS on September 29, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

BLOATED GOVERNMENT WORKERS SET FOR MASS RESIGNATIONS…FINALLY!

SHUT IT DOWN! Mass Federal Resignations Coming This Week

More than 100,000 federal workers stand ready to submit their resignations this Tuesday if the government shutdown cannot be averted, setting a record for the single largest exodus from government service in American history. This wave comes as part of the Trump administration’s deferred resignation program, which has already prompted around 275,000 departures through various voluntary and mandatory measures. The move aims to trim excess from the federal bureaucracy, with the White House estimating annual savings of $28 billion once fully implemented.

At the heart of this program lies a strategy to reshape the workforce without immediate disruptions. Participants receive full pay and benefits for up to eight months while on administrative leave, a setup that has drawn scrutiny for its $14.8 billion price tag but is defended as a cost-neutral bridge to long-term efficiencies.

White House spokesperson explained the rationale plainly: “In fact, this is the largest and most effective workforce reduction plan in history and will save the government $28bn annually,” adding that there was “no additional cost to the government” since these salaries would have been paid anyway.

This approach reflects a push toward an at-will employment model, similar to private sector norms, where the Office of Personnel Management has long argued that outdated job protections hinder adaptability.

Workers who opted into the program often describe a mix of relief and regret, rooted in years of mounting pressures. One longtime employee at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) captured the sentiment: “Federal workers stay for the mission. When that mission is taken away, when they’re scapegoated, when their job security is uncertain, and when their tiny semblance of work-life balance is stripped away, they leave. That’s why I left.”

Such accounts reveal how entrenched routines in federal agencies can erode purpose over time, especially when layers of red tape slow down responses to crises like natural disasters. By streamlining staff, the administration seeks to refocus efforts on core duties, potentially allowing remaining teams to operate with greater speed and accountability—much like how private disaster relief organizations prioritize rapid deployment over bureaucratic hurdles.

The broader context includes threats of a government shutdown if Congress fails to approve funding by the deadline, with the Office of Management and Budget instructing agencies to prepare for mass firings via reduction-in-force procedures. This could push total reductions beyond 300,000 by year’s end, surpassing any single-year drop since World War II. Agencies like the Internal Revenue Service have already shed 25% of their staff through layoffs and buyouts, a change that could ease the burden on taxpayers by curbing overreach in audits and enforcement.

Another USDA worker, who faced probationary firing and reinstatement earlier this year, noted: “At that point, I felt they could terminate me at any time. It’s hard to focus on your work when they can just send you an email and you can be gone, and they completely changed the terms of my work. I was hoping things would stabilize and there would be an opportunity to go back, but now it doesn’t look like there will be an opportunity.”

The federal government is way too big. Just about any reductions in size and scope, whether forced or voluntary, would benefit the nation. We can easily recover from the vast majority of job roles being eliminated. We may not be able to survive the bloated and growing government.

This entry was posted in Government on September 29, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

8000 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES MAKE MORE THAN THE PRESIDENT, SOME OVER $1 MILLION!

More than 8,000 public employees get paid MORE than the president

Nearly 300 getting paychecks for $1 million and up

By Jeremy Portnoy, Real Clear Wire

Topline: The President of the United States has the most important government job in the country, but even with a $400,000 salary, he is far from the highest paid. There were 8,752 public employees at the federal, state and local levels that earned $400,000 or more in base salary in 2024, according to thousands of open records requests filed by Open the Books.

Key facts: The list of employees includes researchers, doctors, university professors and many more. In total, the 8,752 employees earned just over $4.76 billion in base salary. There were 290 people with salaries of at least $1 million.

The top 10 highest-paid employees are all football coaches at public universities. Kirby Smart at the University of Georgia earned the most with a $12.2 million base salary, far more than Thomas Allen in second place at Indiana University.

Every state except Delaware and Montana had at least one person making more than $400,000. California had the most such employees with 890 people earning $465.8 million in total, but Texas spent the most on its high earners with $538.4 million paid to 806 people.

Florida (533 people), Utah (525) and Ohio (488) were the other states with the most $400,000 earners.

The federal government has 995 people on the list — all doctors, most of whom work for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Alexander Nyerges, director of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, was the top-paid public employee not affiliated with a university. He made $1.2 million.

Search all federal, state and local salaries and vendor spending with the world’s largest government spending database at OpenTheBooks.com. 

Background: Open the Books’ auditors file over 60,000 open records requests each year to capture every salary paid to public employees across the nation.

Our list of top earners does not include employees whose base salaries are below $400,000 but boosted their earnings in other ways.

For example, one of Los Angeles’ top firefighters had a base salary of $232,603 but collected $644,456 of overtime last year. Ferry workers in New York City earned overtime payments of up to $500,000. Several major cities have reported only their base salaries in response to Open the Books’ open records requests, and not their other sources of compensation, making a comprehensive list of other top earners impossible.

Summary: As taxpayer-funded salaries across the country continue to rise every year, how long will it be until a $400,000 payout is commonplace?

This entry was posted in Government on September 28, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

TRUMP DOUBLED HIS SUPPORT FROM BLACK VOTERS, BUT MOST ARE CONSISTENTLY VOTING AGAINST THEIR OWN BEST INTERESTS? WHY?

How Trump nearly doubled his support from Black voters

New data shows historic gains made by the president among this racial demographic.

After the presidential election in November, exit polls suggested that Donald Trump could credit his victory to support from young adults, voters lacking a college degree, and Hispanic and Black men. His improvement among Black voters was noteworthy at the time, but new data — based on voters whose participation is confirmed in state election records — confirms that his share was historic.

Trump is the first Republican presidential nominee in nearly half a century to win at least 15 percent of this bloc, according to the Pew Research Center, two points higher than exit polls showed. This means Trump nearly doubled his support from Black voters compared with 2020, increasing from 5 to 10 percent among women and from 12 to 21 percent among men.

Reports attributed this shift to several factors: the appeal of MAGA’s swaggering brand to Black men, the resurgence of Black conservatives after Barack Obama’s presidency and a generational rift among the nation’s most uniform bloc.

Republican strategists in the post-civil rights era believed that if their candidates could win just 20 percent of Black voters, the party would have a stronghold on the White House and “become a majority party.” Trump came closer to that number than Ronald Reagan and every Republican presidential candidate since. Black Republicans are already pushing Trump and the party to take outreach to Black voters seriously if they want to maintain control of Congress.

Trump’s improvement isn’t due to his delivery on campaign promises or better outcomes for Black voters. Though his continued support of historically Black colleges is welcome, he hasn’t kept his word on nearly any other policy promise made to the group. Their economic situation is worsening: Unemployment is up; income and homeownership are down. And it isn’t his style or persona that is winning them over. Only 5 percent of Black Americans strongly approve of his performance, earning him the group’s lowest approval rating since 1983, when Reagan opposed creating a federal holiday for the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. So, what explains Trump’s success?

The easy but incorrect answer is that a growing number of Black Americans are comfortable voting against their interests. The truth is that their party loyalty is fraying and more of them are less likely to link their personal interests to the group’s. A century ago, about 90 percent of Black people lived in the South, creating political bonds as they survived oppression. Scholars have chronicled how segregation and injustice shaped the group’s long-standing solidarity at the ballot box, making civil rights the basis for its politics. But the 1960s were many elections ago — the vast majority of Black voters today were born after the end of Jim Crow and after the Great Migration diffused the Black experience beyond the South. Trump is the first Republican president to benefit from the resulting diversification.

There’s a wide-ranging realignment happening in American politics. The usual cleavages along racial, educational and class lines are changing, and Black America is not immune. A recent study found that 3 in 5 Black voters prioritize health care and cost-of-living concerns over civil rights policy. Younger ones are less partisan, consider racial identity differently in their politics and think most about socioeconomic mobility. Moreover, the Black immigrant population has doubled in the past two decades, and 1 in 5 Black people are either foreign-born or the children of immigrants. In a two-party republic, especially a polarized one, changes in loyalty to the Democratic Party mean some increased support for Republicans.

Perhaps Trump’s campaign sensed the opportunity was ripe for seizing, but if that’s true, the outreach did not reflect it. At a 2024 campaign stop in South Carolina, Trump complained about his criminal indictments before adding: “A lot of people said that’s why the Black people like me. … It’s been pretty amazing but possibly, maybe, there’s something there.” He attended a conference of Black journalists in Chicago where he questioned whether Kamala Harris was Black and amplified false claims that Black immigrants in Ohio were eating their neighbors’ pets. Trump’s success is because an evolving electorate made room for him, not the other way around.

Ideological diversity among Black voters, despite a history of partisan voting, mirrors most groups in America; they are not a monolith. And they are not static, either. Because of the successes and failures of previous generations, their politics, allegiances and priorities change. This generation of Black voters is the first to grow up in an accessible democracy and witness a Black president and vice president — of course their politics have evolved.

There have been three times when 95 percent of Black voters supported the same presidential candidate: during Reconstruction; in 1964, when the Civil Rights Act was effectively on the ballot; and in the Obama campaigns. But rather than signal the beginning of a new politics — such as the idea of a post-racial America in 2008 — maybe these moments were the culmination of the previous struggle. Reconstruction facilitated democratic participation denied at the country’s founding; the civil rights era realized the progress sought during Reconstruction; Obama’s presidency was a product of a half-century of Black electoral solidarity shaped by civil rights legislation.

Trump’s historic showing suggests the realignment underway includes Black voters who are willing to give precedence to factors other than the parties’ rhetoric or records on racial equality. That doesn’t mean Republicans will soon hit their holy grail share of 20 percent nationally. If history is a guide, the party is more likely to squander this opportunity than to appreciate it. Next year’s midterms will offer the best clue as to whether the increased Black support is the party’s or if it is Trump’s alone. Either way, the game is changing.


What readers are saying

The conversation explores various perspectives on the factors contributing to Donald Trump’s increased support among Black voters in the 2024 election. Many participants suggest that misogyny played a significant role, with some Black men reportedly reluctant to vote for a female…
This entry was posted in Government on September 28, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

KRISTIE NOEM FAST TRACKED MILLIONS OF DISASTER AID FUNDS…AND QUESTION? DOES THE USA HAVE THE BEST LOOKING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, COMPARED TO THE UGLY, UGLY ONES APPOINTED BY OBAMA AND BIDEN???

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, center, speaks with Mayor Teresa Heitmann of Naples, Florida, and City Manager Gary Young on a damaged historic pier in the city on Aug. 29. Credit: Tia Dufour/Department of Homeland Security

Kristi Noem Fast-Tracked Millions in Disaster Aid to Florida Tourist Attraction After Campaign Donor Intervened

The DHS chief has been widely criticized for slowing down FEMA’s response after natural disasters. Texts and emails obtained by ProPublica point to an effective way to get help faster: have one of Noem’s big donors make the ask.

For months, the complaints have rolled in from parts of the country hit by natural disasters: The Federal Emergency Management Agency was moving far too slowly in sending aid to communities ravaged by floods and hurricanes, including in central Texas and North Carolina. Many officials were blaming Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, whose agency oversees FEMA.

“I can’t get phone calls back,” Ted Budd, the Republican senator from North Carolina, told a newspaper this month, describing his attempts to reach Noem’s office. “I can’t get them to initiate the money. It’s just a quagmire.” The delays were caused in part by a new policy announced by DHS that requires Noem’s personal sign-off on expenses over $100,000, several news outlets reported.

But records obtained by ProPublica show how one locality found a way to get FEMA aid more quickly: It asked one of Noem’s political donors for help.

The records show that Noem quickly expedited more than $11 million of federal money to rebuild a historic pier in Naples, Florida, after she was contacted by a major financial supporter last month. The pier is a tourist attraction in the wealthy Gulf Coast enclave and was badly damaged by Hurricane Ian in 2022.

Frustrated city officials had been laboring for months, without success, to get disaster assistance. But just two weeks after the donor stepped in, they were celebrating their sudden change of fortune. “We are now at warp speed with FEMA,” one city official wrote in an email. A FEMA representative wrote: “Per leadership instruction, pushing project immediately.”

Along with fast-tracking the money, Noem flew to Naples on a government plane to tour the pier herself. She then stayed for the weekend and got dinner with the donor, local cardiologist Sinan Gursoy, at the French restaurant Bleu Provence, according to records and an interview with the Naples mayor. This account is based on text messages and emails ProPublica obtained through public records requests.

Noem’s actions in Naples suggest the injection of political favoritism into an agency tasked with saving lives and rebuilding communities wiped out by disaster. It also heightens concerns about the discretion Noem has given herself by personally handling all six-figure expenses at the agency, consolidating her power over who wins and loses in the pursuit of federal relief dollars, experts said.

Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University, said that politics has long been a factor in federal disaster relief — one study found that swing states are more likely to get federal help, for example. But “I’ve not heard of anything this egregious — a donor calling up and saying I need help and getting it,” he said, “while others may be getting denied assistance or otherwise waiting in line for help that may or may not come.”

In a statement, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said, “This has nothing to do with politics: Secretary Noem also visited Ruidoso, NM” — where floods killed three people in July — “at the request of a Democrat governor and has been integral in supporting and speeding up their recovery efforts.”

“Your criticizing the Secretary’s visit to the Pier is bizarre as she works to fix this issue for more than 1 million visitors that used to visit the pier,” McLaughlin added. She did not answer questions about the donor’s role in expediting the funding or Noem’s relationship with him. Reached by phone, Gursoy said “get lost” and hung up. He did not respond to detailed follow up questions.

Noem has been criticized for creating a bottleneck at FEMA. When the floods hit Texas this summer — ultimately killing over 100 people — it took days to deploy critical search-and-rescue teams because Noem hadn’t signed off on them, according to CNN. Budd, the Republican senator, said this month: “Pretty much everything Helene-related is over $100,000. So they’re stacking up on her desk waiting for her signature.”

Noem has denied there were delays in the Texas flood response and has defended her expense policy, saying it has saved billions of dollars. “Every day I get up and I think, the American people are paying for this, should they?” she recently said. “And are these dollars doing what the law says they should be doing? I’m going to make sure that they go there.”

Once a sleepy fishing town, Naples is now home to CEOs and billionaires (a property listed for $295 million recently made headlines as the most expensive home in the U.S.). The city is known as an important stop for Republican politicians raising money, and Noem has held multiple fundraisers in the area. State credit card records suggest she visited Naples at least 10 times during her last four years as South Dakota governor.

Noem’s top adviser, Corey Lewandowski, also appears to own a home in Naples near the city’s pier, according to property tax records. Lewandowski is an unpaid staffer at DHS serving as Noem’s de facto chief of staff. (Media reports have alleged the two are romantically involved, which they have both denied.) Lewandowski told ProPublica that he was not involved in the pier decision and that he was not in Naples during Noem’s visit.

For the first seven months of the Trump administration, the pier reconstruction was in bureaucratic purgatory. The city had long been struggling to secure the regulatory approvals it needed to start building, and emails suggest Trump’s wave of federal layoffs had made the process even slower. “These agencies are undergoing significant reorganizations and staff reductions,” a city official told a frustrated constituent in early August. That “sometimes means starting over with new reviewers — something we’ve faced more than once.”

McLaughlin said “both past FEMA and the City bear responsibility” for the delays. She listed “several failures” since the process started in 2023, including “FEMA staff changing up” and indecision by the city government.

By this summer, Naples officials were getting desperate. In June, one tried to enlist Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., to press FEMA to move ahead. “We were told yesterday that Secretary Noem would have to ‘personally’ approve the Pier project before FEMA funding would be obligated,” the city official wrote to the senator’s staff. The Naples mayor, Teresa Heitmann, also personally wrote to FEMA. Heitmann said she was “perplexed” by the delays and begged the agency for guidance.

Heitmann had long been paying expensive Washington consultants to help her city navigate the process. But she was “feeling increasingly helpless,” she later said, until she had the idea that would finally put her project on the fast track. On July 18, the mayor emailed a Google search to herself: “Who is the head of Homeland security?” She was going to go straight to Noem.

Heitmann determined that her best bet for getting Noem’s attention was Gursoy. A Naples cardiologist, Gursoy has no obvious experience working with the federal government; much of his online footprint centers on his enthusiasm for pinball. But Gursoy gave Noem at least $25,000 to support her campaign for governor in 2022. That was enough to put him near the top of Noem’s disclosed donor list. (In South Dakota, campaign contributions remain relatively small.)

On planning documents for the 2024 Republican National Convention obtained by ProPublica, the Florida doctor is listed as an attendee affiliated with the delegation from South Dakota, a state he has no apparent connection to besides his support for Noem. Heitmann told ProPublica that Gursoy introduced her to Noem at a political event at a private home in Naples while Noem was governor.

“Hello it’s Teresa,” the mayor texted Gursoy in early August. “I really need your help.” She explained the tangle of bureaucracy she’d been contending with. “FEMA is holding us up,” Heitmann wrote. “Kristi Noem could put some fire under the FEMA employees slacking.”

Gursoy responded: “Okay. I will get on it.”

The next week, on Aug. 11, the doctor gave Heitmann an update. “Kristi was off for a few days for the first time in a long time, so I left her alone,” he said. “I just txted her now.” Within 24 hours, he had exciting news. He told the mayor to expect a call from Noem’s “FEMA fixer” shortly.

The identity of the “fixer” is not clear, but by Aug. 27, Naples officials were seeing a “flurry of activity” from Noem’s agency. That day, a FEMA staffer told the city that “FEMA is intending to expedite the funding” for the pier. “Secretary Noem took immediate action when I reached out to ask for help,” the mayor soon posted on Facebook.

Kristi Noem Secretly Took a Cut of Political Donations

Two days later, Noem flew to Naples. Her schedule listed a 30-minute walk-through at the pier with the mayor, followed by a nail salon appointment and dinner at Bleu Provence, which serves wagyu short ribs and seared foie gras. Noem then stayed through the weekend at the four-star Naples Bay Resort & Marina. Heitmann told ProPublica she wasn’t at the French dinner but Gursoy was. “I didn’t ask her to come, but she showed up,” the mayor told the local news. “I was very impressed.”

Before she left town, Noem posted about the Naples pier on Instagram. She was finally getting the project back on track, she said. “Americans deserve better than years of red tape and failed disaster responses,” Noem wrote. “Under @POTUS Trump, this incompetency ends.”

PROPUBLICA IS A DEMOCRATIC MOUTHPIECE AND CONSTANT COMPLAINER….THEY BASICALLY HATE SMART WOMEN THAT TRUMP HAS APPOINTED, INSTEAD OF THE UGLY, AND STUPID ONES APPOINTED BY OBAMA, BIDEN AND OTHER “DUMBOCRATS”.

This entry was posted in Government, Illegals, Uncategorized on September 28, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

IOWA SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT WAS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINAL EARNING $265,000!!

SHOCK: ICE Arrests Superintendent of Des Moines, Iowa, Public Schools – An Illegal Alien Fugitive From Guyana with Prior Weapons Arrest

ICE agents on Friday arrested the Superintendent of Des Moines, Iowa, Public Schools – an illegal alien from Guyana with a prior weapons arrest.

According to Fox News, Dr. Ian Andre Roberts was an active ICE fugitive with a deportation order since May 2024. As soon as ICE agents identified themselves, Roberts fled in his car and sped off. He then abandoned his car and fled on foot. Federal agents found him hiding in shrubbery and took him into custody.

Agents found a loaded handgun and a fixed-blade hunting knife in Roberts’ vehicle.

A senior ICE official tells @FoxNews that today, ICE arrested the Superintendent of Des Moines, Iowa Public Schools, Dr. Ian Andre Roberts, who ICE says is an illegal alien from Guyana and active ICE fugitive with a deportation order since May 2024. Fox is told Dr. Roberts fled from ICE agents in his car once they ID’d themselves as immigration agents, speeding away, then abandoning the car. He was found in a brushy area 200 yards away with the help of an Iowa State Police K9. Per ICE official, agents found a loaded gun, a “fixed blade hunting knife”, and $3,000 cash in Dr. Robert’s vehicle.

Per senior ICE official, Roberts first entered the U.S. in 1999 on a F-1 student visa at St. John’s University was ordered removed from the United States on May 22, 2024, with proceedings being held in absentia. On April 24, 2025, an Immigration Judge in Dallas, TX denied a Motion to Reopen his immigration case.

Fox is told Dr. Roberts also has a weapons arrest in 2020, though the disposition of that charge/case is currently unclear.

Dr. Ian Roberts, the Des Moines Public Schools superintendent arrested by ICE, was earning an annual salary of $265,000. He began his tenure on July 1, 2023, and was placed on administrative leave following his arrest in September 2025.

Fox News is reporting that ICE agents recovered a loaded Glock 19 in Roberts’ vehicle.
Full statement from ICE:

ICE arrests criminal alien serving as Des Moines Public Schools Superintendent; prior weapons charges and in possession of loaded handgun at time of arrest

“ICE Des Moines today arrested Ian Andre Roberts, a criminal illegal alien from Guyana in possession of a loaded handgun, $3,000 in cash and a fixed blade hunting knife. At the time of his arrest Roberts was working as the Superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools despite being an illegal alien with a final order of removal and no work authorization.

During a targeted enforcement operation on Sept. 26, 2025, officers approached Roberts in his vehicle after identifying himself, but he sped away. Officers later discovered his vehicle abandoned near a wooded area. State Patrol assisted in locating the subject and he was taken into ICE custody.

Roberts has existing weapon possession charges from February 5, 2020. Roberts entered the United States in 1999 on a student visa and was given a final order of removal by an immigration judge in May of 2024.

The investigation into how Roberts acquired the handgun is being turned over to the ATF. It is a violation of federal law for those in the U.S. without legal status to possess a firearm and ammunition.

“This suspect was arrested in possession of a loaded weapon in a vehicle provided by Des Moines Public Schools after fleeing federal law enforcement,” said ICE ERO St. Paul Field Office Director Sam Olson. “This should be a wake-up call for our communities to the great work that our officers are doing every day to remove public safety threats. How this illegal alien was hired without work authorization, a final order of removal, and a prior weapons charge is beyond comprehension and should alarm the parents of that school district.

Even More Damning Revelations Emerge About Illegal Alien Former Des Moines Superintendent

Fresh details from the Department of Homeland Security paint a troubling picture of Ian Andre Roberts, the former superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools arrested by ICE last week. Roberts, an illegal alien from Guyana, now faces federal charges for possessing firearms unlawfully, on top of a criminal record stretching back decades that includes drug trafficking and weapons offenses.

Authorities discovered three guns during a search of his home, including a loaded 9mm pistol hidden under a living room seat cushion, a rifle in the master bedroom closet, and a shotgun behind the headboard. Another handgun turned up in the vehicle he used while trying to escape ICE agents.

Roberts’ criminal past includes a 1996 arrest in New York for criminal possession of narcotics with intent to sell, criminal possession of narcotics, criminal possession of a forgery instrument, and possession of a forged instrument. Those charges point to early involvement in drug dealing and forgery, activities that should have raised red flags long before he climbed the ranks in public education.

By 2020, he faced more serious accusations in New York: second-degree criminal possession of a weapon for having a loaded firearm outside his home or business, third-degree criminal possession of a weapon involving an ammunition feeding device, and fourth-degree weapon charges. Two years later, in 2022, Pennsylvania convicted him of unlawful possession of a loaded firearm. Even a 2012 conviction in Maryland for reckless driving, unsafe operation, and speeding adds to the pattern of disregard for the law.

Beyond the crimes, a sealed restraining order from Jackson County, Missouri, was served on Roberts in August 2023 by the Polk County Sheriff’s Office. The reasons remain unknown due to the seal, but its existence suggests personal conflicts serious enough to warrant court intervention. Investigators also uncovered that Roberts was illegally registered to vote as a Democrat in Maryland, which calls into question the safeguards in voter registration processes and how someone without legal status could enroll.

DHS officials have made clear their stance on how Roberts ended up in a position of authority over thousands of students. “Ian Andre Roberts, a criminal illegal alien with multiple weapons charges and a drug trafficking charge, should have never been able to work around children,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

This declaration points directly to the failures in vetting that allowed Roberts to oversee Iowa’s largest school district. McLaughlin went further, noting the items found at his arrest: “When ICE officers arrested this Superintendent, he was in possession of an illegal handgun, a hunting knife, and nearly $3,000 in cash.”

Such possessions during a flight from authorities raise alarms about what risks he might have posed in a school environment, where safety is paramount. She added, “This criminal illegal alien is now in U.S. Marshals custody and facing charges for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearms. Under Secretary Noem, ICE will continue to arrest the worst of the worst and put the safety of America’s children FIRST.”

Roberts’ immigration story reveals repeated attempts to stay in the U.S. despite violations. He first arrived in 1994 at John F. Kennedy International Airport on a B-2 visitor visa for pleasure but returned illegally before his 1996 drug arrest. In 1999, he entered via San Francisco on an F-1 student visa, set to expire in 2004. Over the years, he applied for employment authorization three times—in 2000, 2018, and 2019—each granted for one year, with the last expiring in 2020. He filed four green card applications, all denied. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued him a notice to appear in 2020, and on May 22, 2024, a Dallas immigration judge ordered his removal in absentia. His arrest on September 26, 2025, came after he sped away from ICE, abandoned his car, and hid in nearby brush, only to be tracked down with Iowa State Patrol assistance.

Questions about Roberts’ qualifications compound the scandal. On his LinkedIn profile, he claimed attendance at Morgan State University from 2003 to 2007, but the school confirmed he never earned a degree. He also listed himself as an “incoming MBA candidate” at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, yet the registrar’s office has no record of his enrollment in any program there. These fabrications likely helped him secure roles in public education across Baltimore, Washington, D.C., St. Louis, California, Pennsylvania, and Iowa.

During his tenure as superintendent of Pennsylvania’s Millcreek Township School District, Roberts faced lawsuits alleging sex discrimination. One male faculty member sued, claiming Roberts favored less qualified women for principal positions due to bias against men. Local reports indicate the district settled three such suits for over $400,000 while he was in charge. These legal battles reveal a troubled leadership style that prioritized personal agendas over fair practices.

In response to the revelations, Des Moines Public Schools has taken action against the executive search firm that recommended Roberts, filing a lawsuit over the flawed vetting process. Board chair Jackie Norris stated, “Ian Roberts should have never been presented as a finalist.” This move acknowledges the district’s oversight but also shifts some blame to the firm that failed to uncover his deceptions and criminal background.

The case of Ian Andre Roberts exposes deep flaws in how school districts hire leaders and enforce immigration rules. With his history of crimes, false credentials, and illegal status, his rise to superintendent serves as a stark warning about the need for rigorous background checks to safeguard students and communities.


 

This entry was posted in Illegals on September 26, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

RUSSIAN SOLDIERS, WHO WANT TO LEAVE THE WAR ZONE, ARE SIMPLY SHOT, WHAT A GREAT WAY TO MOTIVATE TO JOIN THE MILITARY!

Photo: Russian forces firing on their own soldiers as they try to leave their positions (Getty Images)© RBC-Ukraine

Ukrainian intelligence has once again intercepted communications of the Russian military, in which a commander orders fire on his own troops, according to a post by the Defense Intelligence of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense on Telegram.

Soldiers of the Defense Intelligence intercepted another conversation of the Russian military in the Donetsk region. The Russian commander orders the execution of subordinates who try to retreat from their positions.

386442-e806-4584-9d76-9f8661e04cdd” size=”_2x_1y” part=””>

“There’s no way to retreat, none! No one is retreating anywhere, d*** it! I’m telling you again, d*** it: if anyone tries to run off, f****** shoot them. We are moving only forward, f****** h***, only forward, d*** it,” the Russian commander says.

In addition, Ukrainian intelligence emphasized in their post that the Russian troops will face just retribution for every crime committed against the Ukrainian people.

Defense Intelligence interception

Earlier, we reported that Ukrainian intelligence intercepted a conversation of the Russian forces in which they admitted to maiming their own soldiers when they tried to flee the battlefield. From the conversation, it appears that their comrade with broken limbs would be used as “bait” for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The Defense Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense previously published a conversation in which a relative of one of the Russian military revealed that out of 25 Russian soldiers in the war against Ukraine, only two remained alive.

In February 2022, Vladimir Putin’s invasion plan backfired.
Current Time 0:02
/
Duration 19:28

Earlier, Ukrainian intelligence released a conversation of Russian invaders in which a commander of an enemy unit orders his subordinates

In addition, the Defense Intelligence published a recording of the Russian military’s conversations in which a Russian commander in the Novopavlivka direction orders his subordinates to force Ukrainian soldiers to surrender and then kill them.

PUTIN IS SURE WINNING THE HEARTS OF HIS PEOPLE!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on September 26, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

$2.2 BILLION, AGAIN WASTED, ON POINTLESS GREEN ENERGY PLANT!

$2.2 billion solar plant in California scheduled to be turned off after years of wasted money: ‘Never lived up to its promises’

Seen from the sky, the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility in California’s Mojave Desert resembles a futuristic dream.

Viewed from the bottom line, however, Ivanpah is anything but.

The solar power plant, which features three 459-foot towers and thousands of computer-controlled mirrors known as heliostats, cost some $2.2 billion to build.

Construction began in 2010 and was completed in 2014. Now it’s set to close in 2026 after failing to efficiently generate solar energy.

In 2011, the US Department of Energy under President Barack Obama issued $1.6 billion in three federal loan guarantees for the project and the secretary of energy, Ernest Moniz, hailed it as “an example of how America is becoming a world leader in solar energy.”

Three large solar thermal towers surrounded by fields of heliostat mirrors with mountains in the background at the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility. 6
Three towers glowing at the Ivanpah facility. VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

But ultimately, it’s been more emblematic of profligate government spending and unwise bets on poorly conceived, quickly outdated technologies.

“Ivanpah stands as a testament to the waste and inefficiency of government subsidized energy schemes,”Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, an American energy advocacy group, told Fox News via statement this past February. It “never lived up to its promises, producing less electricity than expected, while relying on natural gas to stay operational.”

Workers washing heliostat mirrors at the Ivanpah Solar Thermal Power Plant. 6
Workers hosing down the computer-controlled mirrors, officially known as heliostats, at Ivanpah. Global Warming Images/Shutterstock

When Ivanpah began operating in 2014, it ranked as the world’s largest solar plant. It seemed like a viable solution to California’s renewable energy goals of employing affordable and efficient technology to reduce the need for fossil fuels.

Located near the California-Nevada border, 65 miles southwest of Las Vegas, the plant’s glowing towers are as striking as some casinos on the Strip.

Solar thermal power tower with a bright white top against a clear blue sky. 6
Ivanpah’s towers are 459 feet high. Global Warming Images/Shutterstock

The facility’s 5 square miles of desert were covered with some 173,500 heliostats, adjusted via computer to catch maximum rays. The computer-controlled mirrors can reflect light from the sun at temperatures that can reach 1,000 degrees in part of the installment.

“The idea was that you could use the sun to produce a heat source,” alternative energy consultant Edward Smeloff told The Post. “The mirrors reflect heat from the sun up to a receiver, which is mounted on top of the tower. That heats a fluid. It creates steam [that spins] a conventional steam turbine. It is complicated.”

Though it sounds like a bit of a Rube Goldberg contraption — and looks like an art installation — Ivanpah was a cutting-edge idea for a while. But, as the market changed, it couldn’t compete with newer and less expensive forms of creating solar power.

“It simply did not scale up,” said Smeloff. “It’s kind of an obsolete technology [that’s] been outpaced by solar photovoltaic technology.”

That tech uses semiconductor material to transform sunlight into energy in a streamlined process. The solar panels you see on many residential rooftops or in endless rows across the desert rely on the technology.

A statement from NRG Energy, the Texas-based company that was an Ivanpah partner and the largest investor, having put up $300 million, agrees with Smeloff’s view.

Illustration of BrightSource Energy Inc.'s Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in the Mojave Desert. 6
The tracking mirrors, officially known as heliostats, turned out to be a danger to birds that flew through the heated rays. Via Bloomberg

“When the power purchase agreements were signed in 2009, the prices were competitive, but advancements over time … have led to more efficient, cost-effective and flexible options for producing reliable clean energy,” a company statement read.

Ivanpah hasn’t just been inefficient and expensive — it’s been deadly for wildlife.

Beams of sunlight are reflected toward one of the solar towers of the Ivanpah solar plant near Primm at the Nevada-California border. 6
By 2026, the light-filled towers of Ivanpah will be no longer. ETIENNE LAURENT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

According to the Association of Avian Veterinarians, the power plant “is believed to be responsible for at least 6,000 bird deaths each year.”

They get fried “if they fly in the area where the reflection is going up to the tower,” Smeloff explained

But maybe it didn’t have to be that way. A report published by World Economic Forum earlier this year noted that private investors can be more nimble with new technologies than the government.

Illustration of BrightSource Energy Inc.'s Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in the Mojave Desert. 6
When Ivanpah began operating in 2014, it ranked as the world’s largest solar plant. Via Bloomberg

“Unlike public market investors, private equity firms can implement transformative changes through hands-on management and aligned incentives,” the report read.

Steven Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environmental Legal Institute and former Trump EPA transition team member, agrees.

“No green project relying on taxpayer subsidies has ever made any economic or environmental sense,” he said. “It’s important that President Trump stop the taxpayer bleeding by ending what he accurately calls the Green New Scam.”

 

This entry was posted in GREEN ENERGY on September 25, 2025 by sterlingcooper.

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • CHINA HAS REAL ROBOTS, AND OUR EXECUTIVES ARE INTIMIDATED BY THEIR PRESENCE EVERYWHERE!
  • MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, SENATE AND STAFFERS WERE EXEMPT FROM BEING REQUIRED TO GET THE COVID “VACCINE”, YET SENILE BIDEN FORCED IT ON EVERYONE ELSE, INCLUDING MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY WHO WERE THEN DISCHARGED IF REFUSED!
  • ENTIRE WORTHLESS FEDERAL AGENCY WITH $100 MILLION BUDGET KICKED OUT!
  • TRUMPS PICK OF BEAUTY QUEENS FOR HIS APPOINTMENTS..IS MUCH IMPROVED OVER THE UGLIEST WOMEN IN THE WORLD PICKED BY BIDEN, CLINTON AND OBAMA! SOME WERE TOTALLY HIDEOUS
  • NEW MOVIE STOKES HATRED OF GOVERNMENT AND ICE, AND DOES NOTHING TO UNITE PEOPLE

Sterling Cooper, Inc. © 2023,  Privacy Policy