Welcome to Sterling Cooper, Inc.
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
  • CALL US: +1-866-285-6572
LOGO
  • INCREASE YOUR REVENUES
    50%-100% - FREE EVALUATION
  • WEF 2025 GLOBAL
    RISKS REPORT
  • CAPITAL GAINS
    TAX DEFERRED
  • INCORPORATE
    NOW FOR $39
  • RESEARCH
    REPORTS
  • ENGULF &
    DEVOUR
  • Home
  • Services
    • Selling a Business
    • Buying a Business
    • Public Relation
    • Cooper consulting
    • Advertising
    • Publishing
    • Web and IT Services
    • Loans
  • Seller
  • buyer
  • Advertising
  • Publishing
  • M&A Due Diligence
  • Blog
  • Contact
LOGO

TRUMP SONS PROFITING FROM MINING DEALS FOR TUNGSTEN

Trump Cut a Billion-Dollar Mining Deal. His Sons Stand to Profit.

Outside the village of Unrek, in rural Kazakhstan, the Soviet Union dug holes into the earth during the Cold War to prospect for tungsten. An American company plans to break ground there again.Credit…By Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

An agreement between the U.S. and Kazakhstan has given a group of American investors with ties to the president and the commerce secretary access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten.

When Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick met with Kazakhstan’s president at the St. Regis Hotel last September in New York, President Trump jumped in by phone as the men sealed a deal on a top priority for Washington.

During the call, Mr. Trump and his team won an agreement from the Kazakh leader to give a little-known American company access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten, a metal that the United States desperately needs for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.

Ahead of the deal, the Trump administration approved preliminary applications for as much as $1.6 billion in federal financing for the American company, now called Kaz Resources, which plans to break ground on the project in rural Kazakhstan.

It was not only Mr. Trump and Mr. Lutnick who saw an opportunity.

Their sons were soon doing business with partners in a deal that their fathers were negotiating, continuing a pattern of self-enrichment in the second Trump administration that has few precedents in American history.

Within weeks of the St. Regis negotiations, investors with a firm called Dominari Securities, which is housed at Trump Tower in New York and partly owned by the president’s two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, joined with other partners to take a 20 percent stake in a corporate entity related to the Kazakhstan project.

Around the same time, Cantor Fitzgerald, an investment company controlled by Mr. Lutnick’s family and overseen by his sons Brandon and Kyle Lutnick, helped one of the lead investors working with Dominari on the Kazakh deal raise $210 million in new capital for a related entity. Such rounds of fund-raising typically net Cantor millions of dollars in fees.

Image

Kyle Lutnick, left, and his brother Brandon Lutnick in September in Atlantic City.Credit…Arturo Holmes/Getty Images for REFORM Alliance
Image

Donald Trump Jr., left, and Eric Trump in August at the Nasdaq Market in Manhattan.Credit…Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

The Kazakh deal was ultimately signed on Nov. 6, six days after the investment involving the Trump sons and their partners, which was not publicly disclosed at the time.

The arrangement is hardly an outlier. One or both families have financial ties to at least 14 companies that are actively working with the federal government on critical mining deals, including the Kazakhstan project, according to federal filings examined by The New York Times.

All 14 of these companies have either benefited directly from offers of financial assistance from the Trump administration, or have pending permit applications before the Commerce Department, which Mr. Lutnick oversees, The Times found. The total amount of federal funding that the Trump administration has provided or is considering providing to the companies exceeds $8.9 billion, according to public statements by the companies and federal government.

The 14 companies working on critical mining deals with the U.S. government that have ties to Cantor Fitzgerald or the Trump family.

USA Rare Earth

Approved to receive up to $1.3 billion in Commerce loans and $277 million in direct federal funding to accelerate neodymium-iron-boron magnet production and potentially another $565 million for rare earths mine in Brazil now held by a company it is acquiring.

Ties: Cantor Fitzgerald as lead agent on capital raise

Kaz Resources

Pursuing $900 million in financing from the Export-Import Bank and up to $700 million from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to support plan to build tungsten mine in Kazakstan

Ties: Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr. are investors in firms involved in the deal; Dominari, another firm the Trump sons own in part, has financial ties to the deal. Cantor Fitzgerald helped one partner in the deal raise capital

Perpetua Resources

Approved for a $2.9 billion loan from the Export-Import Bank for a central Idaho gold and antimony project

Ties: Cantor Fitzgerald as underwriter

Trump Cut a Billion-Dollar Mining Deal. His Sons Stand to Profit. – The New York Times

This emboldened mixing of federal policymaking and personal business began shortly after Mr. Trump returned to office last year, when the Trump and Lutnick sons played a role in billions of dollars of cryptocurrency deals as the fathers helped set policies that supercharged the crypto industry.

Now, the families’ ethically tangled pursuit of profits is extending to the new arms race for critical minerals.

These kinds of deals are a warning sign, said Representative Maxine Dexter of Oregon, the top Democrat on the House panel that investigates accusations of wrongdoing in the mining industry.

“Congress needs to make sure that taxpayer dollars are being used in the public’s interest and not to benefit family members or those closely tied with the Trump administration,” Ms. Dexter said in an interview.

The White House and the Commerce Department, in separate statements, rejected any suggestion that the Trump administration was improperly mixing government actions with family business.

“The only special interest guiding the Trump administration’s decision-making is the best interest of the American people,” Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said in a statement to The Times. “Securing and reshoring America’s critical supply chains has been a top priority for President Trump, and Secretary Lutnick along with the rest of the administration continue to take historic action to safeguard America’s national and economic security.”

At the center of the Kazakhstan deal is an Australia-born rabbi named Pini Althaus, who moved to the United States years ago and set his sights on critical minerals.

Mr. Althaus is the executive chairman of Kaz Resources and the related company that will mine the Kazakh tungsten deposit, and he remains a shareholder in another critical minerals firm he founded that secured up to $1.6 billion in Commerce Department financing this month.

He has proved to be a savvy player, soliciting — and receiving — direct support from top-level federal officials, including Mr. Lutnick, in his efforts to secure deals.

In a series of interviews, he said his discussions with the U.S. government about the tungsten deal started during the Biden administration and did not benefit from any political favors.

Mr. Althaus said that in the weeks after the St. Regis meeting, he was approached by new investors, but that he had never met Mr. Trump’s sons and did not know they were involved. He later came to learn about the Trump family’s participation and understood how that might generate questions, he said.

“I can see how the optics might be disturbing to some people,” Mr. Althaus said. “But that’s unfortunate because this company and this project goes way beyond any one president, let alone any family.”

Central Asia’s Promise

Past the herds of free-roaming horses, the abandoned skeleton of a Soviet worker village and the rolling hills of a verdant Kazakh steppe are the giant water-filled craters at the center of the U.S. deal.

Here, outside the village of Unrek, population 407, the little lakes mark the places where the Soviet Union dug holes to prospect for tungsten.

With its exceptional hardness, density and high melting point, tungsten became known as the “war metal,” with key uses in munitions, aviation and weapons.

The Soviet Union’s collapse interrupted its plans for new mines in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. Tungsten mining in the United States also petered out, with the last operating U.S. mine, in Utah, ceasing production about a decade ago.

ImageAerial view of several large, derelict concrete buildings in a vast, dry landscape. Dirt paths wind between the empty structures.
The shells of prefabricated buildings that the Soviet Union had constructed for a worker village stand as an unfinished ghost town between tungsten deposits on the Kazakh steppe.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

China came to dominate the global tungsten trade. But as Mr. Trump was returning to the White House, Beijing began restricting tungsten and other critical mineral exports, sending the benchmark price for the metal outside China surging sixfold in the past year.

Mr. Trump and his aides responded by pushing through, with the help of Congress, a giant wave of federal funding to bankroll a new generation of U.S. mining firms.

Since Mr. Trump returned to office, the federal government has given conditional or final approval to 60 critical minerals projects worldwide backed by $18.6 billion in federal loans, loan guarantees or other financing, according to a count in May by BMO Capital Markets, a leading bank in the sector. That is the largest amount in U.S. history, a bank executive said.

The Pentagon and the Export-Import Bank, where Mr. Lutnick sits on the board, are among the federal agencies bankrolling the push. The moves have created a modern-day gold rush in the critical minerals industry, as start-ups seek to get a chunk of the federal largess.

For example, Donald Trump Jr. is a partner at another investment firm that last summer took a stake in a tiny start-up mining company called Vulcan Elements. Months later, the company signed a nearly $700 million deal with the federal government to help finance the expansion of its production in North Carolina.

“The level of activity compared to, say, 2023 is like night and day,” said Max Yerrill, a BMO vice president. “It has been one of the hottest sectors.”

Image

A vibrant blue and purple mineral, speckled with bright, glittery flecks. Its reflection shimmers on the dark surface below.
A rock sample with tungsten ore, illuminated by ultraviolet light, that was picked up at the Kazakhstan site. The U.S. desperately needs tungsten for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

For Kazakh officials, such deals offer their landlocked nation a new calling card in foreign affairs and an entree with Mr. Trump.

The country can produce and process 25 of the 60 commodities on the U.S. critical minerals list, according to Olzhas Alibekov, a top official at Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Industry and Construction.

“Kazakhstan is positioning itself as an important player in the global rare and rare earth metals market,” said Nurlan Zhakupov, the chief executive of the Kazakh sovereign wealth fund, which owns the state mining company that is partnering with Kaz Resources on the tungsten project.

Image

A person in a blue top kneels on gray rocks, looking at an object in their hands. In the background, a lake is bordered by a reddish-brown bank under a cloudy sky.
Alibek Kazbekuly of Kaz Resources examining rocks at one of the tungsten deposits.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

That project will require a huge investment, which Mr. Althaus estimates will total about $650 million initially and $1.1 billion over the life of the project. According to his firm’s own calculations, the tungsten there might be worth as much as $80 billion.

His company could not make the project happen by itself. He needed the U.S. government to cut a deal with Kazakhstan at the highest levels, and to pledge financing to make the math work. In return, the United States could get access to an estimated 12,000 metric tons of tungsten a year, about as much as is now imported annually.

A New York Deal

At the St. Regis Hotel that day in September 2025, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan was in the middle of a speed-dating-like procession of meetings with executives from corporate giants like Citigroup, Amazon and Chevron.

Among Mr. Tokayev’s corporate guests was Mr. Althaus, who was there to push Kazakhstan to approve the mining project. Mr. Lutnick had his own audience with the Kazakh president at the hotel that day.

“You have great critical minerals that we can invest in together,” the commerce secretary told Mr. Tokayev, according to a recording of parts of the meeting that the Kazakh leader posted on social media.

Mr. Lutnick had made a number of moves over several months to help push along the deal.

He sent a letter last year to Mr. Tokayev urging the country to give the contract to Mr. Althaus and his financial backers, telling them that the Trump administration “fully supports” the company (then known as Cove Kaz) in its efforts.

Thumbnail of page 1

Read the document

A letter from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan.

Read Document

The Export-Import Bank and a second federal agency where Mr. Lutnick is also on the board, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, each issued letters of interest last summer to provide Mr. Althaus’s firm with tentative financing for the project. Those loans together could be worth as much as $1.6 billion.

By the time of the St. Regis meeting, Mr. Lutnick was closing in on securing Mr. Tokayev’s agreement for the deal. That is when Mr. Trump called in.

“President Trump, Secretary Lutnick and Secretary Rubio all personally got involved,” said Mr. Althaus, who did not attend the closed-door meeting. “President Trump did the final negotiation with President Tokayev for this deal.”

Chinese bidders were also looking to get access to the Kazakh tungsten site, which is one reason Mr. Althaus needed help from the U.S. government.

The final signing took place on Nov. 6, during a high-profile summit in Washington, where Mr. Trump welcomed the five leaders of Central Asia and highlighted his interest in their critical minerals.

Content from blocked embed
This joint venture between Cove Kaz Capital and Kazakhstan’s national mining company Tau-Ken Samruk is a landmark project for 🇺🇸U.S. investment in 🇰🇿Kazakhstan’s mining sector.
🔗https://t.co/dVInD8B219 pic.twitter.com/0jd4DgqfmV— U.S. Mission to Kazakhstan (@USembassyKAZ) February 11, 2026

Under the terms of the deal, Mr. Althaus’s firm now owns 70 percent of the venture, and the Kazakh state mining company will own 30 percent.

Investors involved in the Kazakh deal have several different business plans slated to benefit from Trump administration support — and that also do business with Cantor Fitzgerald.

This month, for example, the Trump administration committed to provide up to $1.6 billion in financial support to USA Rare Earth, the other mining company Mr. Althaus founded and in which he remains a shareholder.

That deal gives the Commerce Department 16 million shares of the company’s stock. Cantor Fitzgerald separately earned millions of dollars in fees by helping USA Rare Earth in a series of deals since last year that ultimately raised $1.5 billion for the company.

Cantor Fitzgerald, which Mr. Lutnick ran before he became commerce secretary, has long had a division that helps mining companies raise capital. But it has seen a surge in its business helping to launch or finance mining companies, especially those benefiting from Trump administration support.

Democrats in Congress have called for an investigation into the proposed Commerce Department stake in USA Rare Earth. They told Mr. Lutnick in a letter that it was “the latest example of how official Commerce Department business has intersected with Cantor Fitzgerald’s financial interests during your tenure.”

Even some Trump administration officials directly involved in the effort — who spoke to The Times on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter — said they were disappointed to see the links between the Lutnick and Trump families and the projects the government has proposed to help finance.

A Cantor spokesman, in a statement to The Times, said the company’s executives were not involved in discussions related to government funding on behalf of their mining industry clients.

“Cantor is a natural partner for companies raising capital to meet the growing demand for critical minerals,” said the spokesman, Stan Neve.

In a statement, the Commerce Department said that neither Mr. Lutnick nor anyone at the department had “interacted with or had any discussions whatsoever with Cantor Fitzgerald regarding the rare earth minerals industry.” It noted that Mr. Lutnick had sold his ownership stake in Cantor.

A Trump Stake

The Trump brothers’ ties to the Kazakhstan deal started at their father’s tower on Fifth Avenue in New York.

That is where Dominari Securities, a small financial services firm, had set up its offices after Mr. Trump’s first stint in the White House ended.

Such proximity to the Trump Organization’s headquarters afforded Dominari executives the chance to form friendships — and then business relationships — with Mr. Trump’s sons.

“That’s how the relationship started and developed,” Allan Evans, one of Dominari’s business partners, said in an interview.

After Mr. Trump returned to the White House, Dominari hired Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump as paid advisers, giving them stock now worth about $7 million, representing about 10 percent of the company’s total shares. The firm launched an explicit effort to invest in companies aligned with the president’s agenda, ranging from military drones to critical minerals.

To carry out the Kazakh tungsten investment, Dominari relied on the sort of complex corporate maneuvering that is a hallmark of its deals.

First, Dominari partnered with Paul E. Mann, a British investor and entrepreneur who more recently has also been looking to get into the critical minerals sector.

Using a subsidiary of Mr. Mann’s nuclear energy company, ASP Isotopes, the group of investors last summer bought a controlling amount of shares in a failing road construction firm called Skyline Builders. That might seem like an odd move, but they did so for a reason — Skyline is listed on the Nasdaq exchange. So the ASP subsidiary now controlled a publicly traded company.

Dominari and the Trump sons joined this effort through what is known as a Special Purpose Vehicle, which took a stake in Skyline, as was first reported by The Financial Times. The Trump sons have a second small interest in the deal, through an investment they made directly in the ASP subsidiary late last year, according to Mr. Mann.

In late September, the Trump administration secured the verbal agreement from the Kazakh government for the tungsten rights.

That set their move into play.

In October, Cantor Fitzgerald helped raise $210 million for ASP Isotopes.

By Oct. 31, Skyline, now controlled by ASP, took a 20 percent stake in Mr. Althaus’s Kazakhstan-focused corporate entity, for $20 million. The former road building company was suddenly in the mining business.

Six days later, the final deal with the Kazakh government was signed in Washington by Mr. Lutnick.

Mr. Mann, in an interview, insisted the money that Cantor raised for ASP Isotopes was not used in the mining deal. Nevertheless, Cantor — the investment firm overseen by Mr. Lutnick’s sons — was fund-raising for Mr. Mann’s company at the same time that its subsidiary was preparing to invest in a deal that Mr. Lutnick was negotiating as commerce secretary.

In December, Mr. Mann approached Mr. Althaus with a proposal for a maneuver known as a “reverse merger,” which would replace Skyline Builders on the Nasdaq exchange with a new entity known as Kaz Resources, Mr. Althaus said. The merger, which will essentially take the mining operation public, was announced in April.

The listing will allow investors to profit on the Kazakhstan project by trading its stock before any tungsten comes out of the ground. U.S. government backing of such projects often pushes up the stock price, making money for early-stage investors who exit at the right time.

As part of the merger, Skyline agreed to make about $50 million available for the Kazakh project beyond the original $20 million investment, Mr. Althaus said.

Mr. Althaus said he needed the money from the merger to begin work on the Kazakhstan project. The merger still requires U.S. regulatory approval to close.

Dominari did not respond to requests to comment.

Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. said in separate statements that they were not involved in the specifics of the deal, with Eric Trump writing that he “has always been a passive investor with absolutely no management role.”

Mr. Mann confirmed that Mr. Trump’s sons have a financial interest in the deal. But he said he had not spoken to them, or anyone in the Trump family, about it.

“When you look at it, take a step back here, there’s no conflict of interest here,” Mr. Mann said. “And it’s certainly in the United States government’s best interest to want to do this deal.”

He also said he did not pick Cantor to raise money for his company because Mr. Lutnick is commerce secretary.

“Of course not,” he said, adding, “Should Cantor exclude themselves from all deals in the mining sector? That’s unfair on Cantor.”

Moving Toward Production

So far, none of the $1.6 billion in U.S. government financial support for the Kazakh mining project has come through, as it is subject to additional approvals, a Trump administration official said. Mr. Althaus’s firm is undertaking a final feasibility study that will be reviewed.

That does not mean that no one has made money.

Federal filings suggest that both Cantor Fitzgerald (run by the Lutnicks) and Dominari Securities (partly owned by the Trumps) have earned fees for their work. They were both paid for their services helping executives involved in the series of transactions to raise new capital.

Mr. Althaus said he was now focused on moving the project toward production, which he hopes will begin by 2030, though there is pressure to speed up the timeline.

“If we had a door to knock on, so to speak, we would have,” he said. “We did this the hard way through advocacy.”

Image

A cloudy sky hangs over a rocky landscape with a body of water. People stand on the shore and a small rocky island.
Employees working for Mr. Althaus’s firm at the tungsten site.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

Kitty Bennett, Oleg Matsnev and Alina Lobzina contributed research.

  1. Since the start of President Trump’s second term, The New York Times has been documenting examples of moves by members of Mr. Trump’s family or the families of top aides to profit off of Trump administration policy actions. The Times has already documented such moves in the worlds of cryptocurrency and military contracting. Today, we dive deeply into a similar pattern playing out as the United States, backed with billions of dollars in Trump-era federal funding, is pushing to expand the supply of critical metals for the Pentagon and American manufacturers.As the Trump administration has pursued this agenda, the president’s sons and an investment bank run by the sons of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have also been looked for ways to profit from the critical metals frenzy.

 

This entry was posted in TRUMP on June 29, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

FOMO WITH SPACEX AND OTHER SPACE DREAM STOCKS IS NOW SHOWING THE TRUTH TO INVESTORS

SpaceX FOMO is officially over. Space stocks across the board are getting punished.© Rocket Lab

Stocks in the space sector deepened their declines on Thursday as the SpaceX halo fades further.

At least four space stocks — the space-exploration firm Virgin Galactic satellite firm Redwire space-infrastructure firm Intuitive Machines and the in-space transit company Momentus — have recorded 50% drops so far in June, based on FactSet data. Several others, including Planet Labs and Firefly Aerospace are down 40% or more for the month as of Thursday afternoon.

Sponsored

Even Rocket Lab which has seen a smattering of good news lately, has been affected by the broader space-sector pressure. Shares fell 5.5% on Thursday, contributing to a 44% decline so far in June.

SpaceX’s public launch on June 12 may have increased interest in the space industry, but it also highlighted the steep valuations associated with some space companies, according to CFRA analyst Keith Snyder. Adding to the volatility for the newly public company, SpaceX shares were down about 1% on Thursday, trading at about $153 a share, slightly above their debut price on the Nasdaq.

The analyst, who is bullish on Rocket Lab, noted that at one point the company’s shares were trading at about 100 times revenue. That kind of “insane” valuation, in Snyder’s view, used to be unheard of. It was a large part of the reason he ended up rating SpaceX’s stock a sell.

“I think there’s a little bit of kind of coming to terms with that in the space sector,” Snyder told MarketWatch. “While the growth is there, I think people are starting to realize it’s going to take more time than we thought for this industry to really take off,” and thereby to make some of these valuations justifiable.

The downturn has also slammed funds following the space industry. The Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast exchange-traded fund is the worst performer, down 47% on a month-to-date basis, per FactSet data. At least five other sector ETFs have dropped at least 30% in June.

The Procure Space ETF is having its worst month in six years. The ETF is down by about 30% month to date, putting it on track to end June with a greater loss than it recorded in March 2020, when it fell 28.8% as the COVID-19 pandemic began, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

“All space ETFs are feeling the ‘investment coma’ from the pre-launch fear of missing out on SpaceX to the reality now of owning a very volatile space stock,” Micah Walter-Range, president of space consulting firm Caelus Partners and a contributor to the index behind UFO, said in an emailed statement on Wednesday.

Read: Rocket Lab, Lockheed Martin among the partners in SpaceX’s military space-laser project

In the future, the sector outlook could look brighter, according to experts. However, that will likely take some time, especially as SpaceX’s stock is expected to demonstrate considerable volatility for weeks to come as insiders exit lockup periods and become able to sell their shares.

Related video: Elon Musk celebrates SpaceX IPO, jokes about early low odds of success (Fox Business)

Fox Business
Elon Musk celebrates SpaceX IPO, jokes about early low odds of success
And let me tell you, if people had told me

“Post [SpaceX] IPO-related volatility, we see compelling opportunities across the rapidly growing space sector,” KeyBanc analyst Michael Leshock said in a note to clients this month as he lifted his ratings on Rocket Lab and Firefly to overweight.

Leshock and others point to the growing activity stemming from NASA, which is expected to lean heavily on commercial partners for missions to the moon and other tasks. National security also remains a major opportunity for much of the sector.

“There is a significant push by the U.S. government to advance its capabilities in space,” Leshock said. “This is not optional, it is mandatory for the U.S. to maintain a leadership position in space.”

 

This entry was posted in SPACE STOCKS on June 26, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

THE ULTRA WEALTHY IN THE WORLD SURGED IN 2025!

Ranks of Ultrawealthy Surged in ’25

Number of those worth more than $30 million jumped by 14.4% last year

The ranks of the ultrawealthy hit a high in 2025 as the AI trade lifted global markets, according to a new report by wealth-intelligence firm Altrata.

The number of ultrawealthy individuals—those Altrata defines as having a net worth of more than $30 million— jumped by 14.4% last year to 556,850 people worldwide by the end of 2025. That’s the fastest pace of growth since 2017.

“What we’ve been seeing in the past decade is, on the whole, it’s been going up over time and it’s been growing quickly,” said Altrata Senior Director Maya Imberg, referring to the number of ultrawealthy people.

Lower inflation, resilient corporate earnings and enthusiasm for AI investment also bolstered the number of the ultrawealthy individuals and the value of their holdings in 2025.

One of the fastest-growing subgroups of the ultrawealthy in recent years has been centimillionaires, or those worth more than $100 million, mainly from founding or investing in rapidly-growing technology companies, according to Altrata. That echoes findings from other research showing that the world is get–ting wealthier, but with riches disproportionately accruing to the wealthiest.

One such study, the World Inequality Report 2026, found that the wealth of the richest b i l l i o n a i re s from 1995 to 2025 had grown at about 8.5% a year compared with about 3.4% a year for the bottom half of the global population.

The researchers said that by their count, around 60,000 people— the top 0.001% wealthiest in the world—are each worth at least $254 million.

“The population that can fit in a football stadium own three times more wealth than half of humanity combined,” said Ricardo Gómez-Carrera, lead author of the report, when it was released, referring to the w e a l t h i e s t 0.001% of the population. The Altrata report showed that those worth more than $30 million made up a little over 1% of the millionaire population—defined as those worth $1 million or more—but held 32% of that group’s wealth. Zooming out, the ultrawealthy made up 0.01% of the global adult population but held 11% of all private wealth held by individuals. Imberg said the Altrata numbers tell a story about the outsize returns possible from financial wealth, including from investments, from successful entrepreneurship and from ongoing intergenerational wealth transfers.

The U.S. remained home to more of the ultrawealthy than the rest of the top 10 countries combined, with 37% of the population. China and Germany came in second and third, respectively, with about 10% and 5%.

The New York metropolitan area continued to have the largest number of ultrawealthy residents, followed by the metropolitan areas of Hong Kong, Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Portion of the ultrawealthy in the U.S. last year, the most of any country.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 24, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

SPACEX …WHERE FOOLS PUT THEIR MONEY????

SPACEX: The Seven-Headed Hydra at the End of Finance

What has SpaceX become?
By Charlie Warzel
A SpaceX rocket launches into the air.
SpaceX had its initial public offering last week. Now Elon Musk is a trillionaire on paper. But what is SpaceX? On one level, of course, SpaceX is a company that builds rockets and spacecraft and launches them into space. (Occasionally the rockets explode.) It is also the company that birthed Starlink, a satellite-internet business that generated more than $11 billion in revenue last year.
But the company can be defined in many ways. SpaceX is a financial instrument for Musk. Before the IPO, SpaceX acquired xAI, Musk’s artificial-intelligence company, which itself acquired X, the social-media site, back in 2025.
The maneuver allowed SpaceX to claim that it believed it had “the largest actionable total addressable market in human history”: $28.5 trillion, to be precise. $26.5 trillion of that, according to the filing, would come from AI infrastructure and applications, meaning not from SpaceX’s core business of aerospace engineering and satellites.
Maybe most important, SpaceX is a story, even a meme. Musk is arguably a better salesman than an inventor, and what he began selling early on was a techno-utopian dream—of himself as a Tony Stark–style genius, of an environment-saving EV revolution, of securing a future for humanity by getting us all to Mars. He intuitively understands the warped dynamics of the attention economy. Ben Tarnoff and Quinn Slobodian, the authors of the book Muskism, describe his strategy on social media as “trolling is infrastructure”: “Every joke, every poll is a stress test of responsiveness,” they argue. “Can he still move markets with a post?” Dogecoin, the cryptocurrency based on a 13-year-old meme of a shiba inu, is the shining example of Musk’s ability to lavish attention on something—in this case, a fake asset whose entire joke was that it was worthless—and make it worth more to others as a result.
SpaceX is obviously not Dogecoin. Its rocket business is a genuine success story, as is Starlink. But the company’s appeal, particularly in the face of setbacks, is also reliant on a combination of story and Musk’s own image in ways that are not necessarily connected to reality.
Musk has frequently set unrealistic timelines for projects, including putting a spacecraft on Mars by 2018. Last year, SpaceX’s flagship rocket underwent a “rapid unscheduled disassembly” on three test flights (it blew up). But SpaceX’s IPO filing was more oriented around its future ambitions and assumed triumphs, such as its desire to mine asteroids, promote space tourism, and “extend the light of consciousness to the stars.” An adviser to the deal told the Financial Times last month: “From a strict corporate finance perspective, the valuation makes no sense. But Elon is great at getting people to dream.”
What do you get when you combine SpaceX the business with the financial instrument and the meme? An unfathomable amount of money, it seems. Last week SpaceX opened trading at a market capitalization of $1.7 trillion. The scale of Musk’s own net worth is now almost impossible to comprehend, such that, on Monday, SpaceX’s stock rallied, and Musk’s one-day gain was more than the net worth of Bill Gates, once the richest person in the world. In short order, SpaceX has become the sixth-most valuable public company despite the fact that it posted a net loss of $4.94 billion last year on $18.7 billion in revenue.
On Tuesday, SpaceX announced it is using some of that value to purchase Cursor, the AI-coding start-up, for $60 billion, all in stock. In reaction to the news, Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund manager (and inveterate poster), wrote on X: “One of the things that makes SpaceX so valuable is how valuable it is.” Ackman’s reasoning rings true in a financial sense: According to the deal, the price that SpaceX will pay for Cursor will be set by its own share price in the seven trading days before closing, which in effect will mean that the more valuable SpaceX is, the less Cursor will cost it. But Ackman’s koan is also correct in a more absurdist way. It highlights the irrationality of the modern stock market and reflects a lesson of the past decade: If a person or group of people is able to marshal enough genuine attention toward an idea—no matter how ridiculous it might seem—they can usually bend reality toward their preferred outcome.
ther than perhaps Donald Trump, it’s difficult to argue anyone has been more successful at this than Musk. Musk excels not because he can’t stop winning, but because he understands that, in the financialized logic of our age, winning is less important than the perception that you will win. Speculation beats fundamentals.
One way to look at Musk’s personal brand is as somebody who has borrowed obsessively against his own reputation, each loan used to invest in and service the debt of the last, until it becomes impossible to follow the money. One of the things that makes Elon Musk so valuable is how valuable he is.
With SpaceX’s IPO, you could argue that Musk has either won or broken capitalism. His wealth, in our current system, makes him a chaos agent with no real comparison. He is virtually impervious to fines. His money, should he wish to spend it, has the potential to drastically influence the outcome of elections.
That leverage could be used to benefit Musk’s businesses, securing further contracts with the government and entrenching him deeper into the infrastructure of everyone’s lives. This power isn’t theoretical; Musk’s dominance in satellite connectivity has already made him geopolitically relevant in places including Ukraine and Iran.
SpaceX and Musk are, of course, not inevitable. Analysts are predicting volatility for the  stock as lockup periods end and people sell shares. The AI bubble could pop. Musk could mismanage the company as he did with X, or he could become so radioactive that institutions stop associating with him.
But you can also imagine the SpaceX flywheel spinning out of control, perpetuating itself as Musk and SpaceX become fully untethered from reality. On X, Will Manidis, a start-up founder and investor, argued recently that, given the dynamics of SpaceX’s stock, it could continue to purchase some of the internet’s foundational software companies at a cost of basically nothing. Neither Musk nor SpaceX responded to a request for comment on SpaceX’s direction, and such tweets, at this moment, are little more than fan fiction.
But they represent the absurdity of Musk’s current position in the modern economy. Musk has long fantasized about creating a massive, vertically integrated constellation of services—from banking to social networking—he once dubbed “the everything app.” So far, he’s failed in that quest (the phrase trust Elon Musk with your routing number would still strike fear in the hearts of most people). But it’s not difficult to see Musk using his cheap and abundant money to build toward the Everything Holding Company.
Is any of this possible? Would it even be legal? That’s unclear. But as Bloomberg’s Matt Levine once noted, it seems like “Elon Musk’s recent career is a long experiment to prove that, if you are successful enough, the regular laws do not apply to you.”
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi memorably described Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”
Goldman Sachs, he wrote, “positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble,” enabled by “a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules.”
Revisiting that article in the age of Musk the trillionaire feels almost quaint. Musk and SpaceX have a true nose for money, including sniffing out government infusions and contracts. The aerospace company has figured out how to position itself firmly in the middle of the speculative hype of the AI cycle, and numerous financial organizations have amended rules designed to protect retail investors.
The vampiric Goldman Sachs that Taibbi describes is an institution, a system that became too big to fail, and thus ungovernable. Musk is a person, not a system or institution, but he owns more than 40 percent of SpaceX and controls more than 80 percent of its voting shares. According to Reuters, in the lead-up to SpaceX’s IPO Musk was dictating terms to Goldman Sachs and other banks.
If Goldman Sachs is the vampire squid, what does that make SpaceX and Musk?
The natural world offers few good comparisons. What we’re seeing in terms of hype, valuation, and fortune is without precedent, even when stacked up against the wealth concentration of the Gilded Age.
SpaceX and Musk are better served by a mythological comparison, in part because the entire enterprise is built on a story told over and over until it transcends reality. SpaceX is a rocket company, a complex financial instrument, a meme, a monument to a broken financial system.
It is the seven-headed Hydra at the end of finance, the teleological endpoint of money. It is a myth kept alive by blind faith, devotion, and even aggression, which makes it dangerous whether you believe in it or not.
This entry was posted in SPACEX on June 21, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

TOM CRUISE HAS AN AIRPLANE COLLECTION!

What Planes Does Tom Cruise Own?

Gulfstream IV G4 jet parked at an airport Credit: Photo: Austin Deppe/Shuttertock
  • Tom Cruise is a licensed pilot with qualifications as a multi-engine instrument-rated pilot and helicopter flying skills.
  • Cruise owns a collection of airplanes, including a vintage P-51 Mustang fighter from World War II and a Gulfstream IV G4 jet.
  • There may be additional aircraft in Cruise’s fleet, such as a HondaJet and a Bombardier Challenger 300 jet, according to a travel expert.

It wasn’t just a show for ‘Top Gun.’ Tom Cruise is one of the few actors who genuinely love aviation. He has been a licensed pilot since 1994 and is able to fly several types of aircraft. However, it doesn’t stop with a license. The famous Hollywood actor also has a collection of airplanes varying from vintage fighters to business jets.

What kind of license does Cruise have?

In various discussions, Tom Cruise has revealed that his affinity for aviation was crucial to his initial attraction to the original ‘Top Gun.’ He shared that he holds qualifications as a multi-engine instrument-rated pilot and has continued to enhance his skill set throughout his life. Notably, he acquired helicopter flying skills for the remarkable stunts seen in the 2018 film ‘Mission Impossible: Fallout.’

Plane collection

North American P-51 Mustang fighter

During a segment on The Late Late Show, Cruise took host James Corden for a ride in his own vintage P-51 Mustang fighter plane. Tom Cruise acquired this World War II fighter in 2001, which was initially built in 1946.

The P-51 Mustang flying Credit: Photo: Bogac Erkan | Shutterstock

The P-51 Mustang was an American long-range fighter bomber that served alongside other conflicts during World War II and the Korean War. It was developed by North American Aviation and was retired in 1984. Nevertheless, even today, the fighter is utilized for air racing by civilian pilots. After being donated to an Illinois museum, the plane underwent restoration in 1997.

Get the latest aviation news straight to your inbox: Sign up for our newsletters today.

Making his recent performance in ‘Top Gun: Maverick,’ Tom Cruise takes to the skies in the P-51 Mustang fighter. What adds intrigue to this is the revelation that he wasn’t just portraying the pilot on screen – he was actually at the controls of his very own P-51 Mustang fighter.

Gulfstream IV G4 jet

With an estimated price tag of $20 million, this jet boasts the capability to accommodate as many as 19 passengers. Notably, it reportedly comes furnished with luxuries, including a jacuzzi and a dedicated movie-screening room, according to Business Insider.

The Gulfstream G4 jet landing during the evening
Photo: Anton Volynets/Shutterstock

The Gulfstream IV G4 is a long-range executive jet designed and built by Gulfstream, a General Dynamics company based in Savannah, Georgia, United States, from 1985 until 2018. Its production spanned from 1985 to 2018, resulting in over 900 G4 units taking to the skies. This jet can cover distances of up to 7,100 kilometers and achieve a top speed of 850 kilometers per hour.

Is there more?

Whether the actor has more aircraft in its fleet has been under speculation as it was never officially confirmed. But according to a Business Insider report, in addition to the vintage fighter jet and the Gulfstream IV G4, Jack Sweeney, who is famous for reporting the travel habits of numerous celebrities, including Elon Musk, said he has been able to identify Cruise’s HondaJet and a Bombardier Challenger 300 jet.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 16, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

FIVE JOBS THAT ARE STRESSFUL AND NOT WORTH IT INCLUDING ONE FOR $9 MILLION ANNUAL COMPENSATION!

Despite the difficult job market, many dissatisfied Americans are seeking new roles.

Some 69 percent of workers cite higher pay and benefits as their reason for looking for a better position, according to a March survey from polling firm Gallup. However, a bigger paycheck doesn’t always mean a better job.

“What I’m noticing now, especially since the pandemic and all the layoffs we have recently had, is that people are starting to reassess what is truly successful,” Trevor Houston, CEO at ClearPath Wealth Strategies, told The Independent in an email. “More people are asking, ‘What is this all costing me?’ Not just financially, but personally, too, because after all, your career should serve your life, not replace it.”

The Independent asked career and industry experts about high-paying careers – those at least 50 percent higher than the $64,000 national median salary – where the costs significantly outweigh the perks.

Senior corporate leader

Senior corporate leaders – such as senior vice presidents – get the satisfaction of making major company decisions and earning a median salary of $105,350, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Despite the appeal, many senior leaders leave their coveted roles since the paycheck and status no longer seem worth the high cost to themselves and their families, Houston said.

“Many of them feel worn down by the never-ending demands and the pressure to always be on,” he said. “They feel like they’re missing out on family, while their mental, physical, and relational health suffer. Some feel like they’ve sold out their identity for the sake of their paycheck.”

Even when senior leaders realize their responsibilities are hurting their quality of life, the pay can become a trap – other roles with less pressure may have less pay, too.

“I call this the golden handcuff effect, where you have to stay even though you know it’s costing you because of the lifestyle you’ve built [around the salary],” Houston said.

A senior corporate leader’s salary doesn’t always account for how sustainable the job’s demands are, Houston said. Ultimately, the pay may not seem worth it if keeping the job means damaging health or relationships.

Commercial trucker

Commercial trucking pays up to $100,000 per year and doesn’t require a degree, making it an attractive high-paying position for those without a degree, said Andrew Brown, CEO of Immediate Movers and Storage. But many underestimate the costs and risks of long-distance driving.

“Long-term sustainability in commercial trucking is challenged by a combination of physical stress, mental burnout, and time away from family,” Brown told The Independent in an email. ”The average driver sits for 10 to 14 hours without moving, causing the body to ultimately break down in ways that usually do not appear at first.”

Truck drivers also face physical risks on the road. The job is part of the most dangerous occupation in the country based on fatalities – transportation, according to a February report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

‘Families pay a price for a driver’s time away from home that is not factored into the hourly wage,’ one expert said. (Getty Images)

Typically, commercial trucking doesn’t allow for a life that balances professional and personal needs. That can impact the driver’s relationships and sense of meaning, Brown said.

“A driver can leave home for an extended period, and during that time, holidays or weekends have little or no meaning compared to delivering a load,” he said. “As a result, families pay a price for a driver’s time away from home that is not factored into the hourly wage.”

Big law partner

Some partners at big law firms bring in as much as $9.3 million a year, depending on the firm, according to a 2026 report from legal recruitment and placement firm BCG Attorney Research.

But the prestige and pay come at the cost of a frenetic work environment, said Loren Margolis, an executive coach and Stony Brook University faculty member.

“The hours are thankless and brutal because you must make your ‘billable hours,’ which is doing client-facing work or client-oriented work on legal matters that move your client’s needs forward,” Margolis told The Independent in an email. “You have a threshold that you must meet in order to maintain your partner title.”

An on-call schedule that destroys work-life balance is a reality for these attorneys. This means working nights, weekends, and even vacations, Margolis said. Unsurprisingly, partners may find the prestige underwhelming, given the toll on their personal lives.

“The external rewards quickly fade as a source of satisfaction because all you have is your work life, not a home life or anything else,” Margolis said.

Other workplace factors create an environment that can lead to job dissatisfaction, too.

“Firm politics can be brutal, where others elbow you out of clients, deals and leave you out of the room during important meetings so they can get ahead,” Margolis said.

Management consultant

Management consulting -giving businesses advice on how to improve efficiency – offers strong job prospects and a median salary of $101,190, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, the career is a tough one, given shaky job security and high competition, said Joel Marotti, senior managing partner at resume writing firm Vertical Media Solutions.

Business consultants can earn as much as $285,000 at big firms, but turnover rates and AI’s influence make openings risky for those looking for a long-term role at a company (Getty Images for Community Catal)

An employee with a master’s in business administration working for a major strategy firm, such as BCG or McKinsey, might start at $260,000 to $285,000, according to Marotti.

But many don’t stay for more than two to four years, raising questions about longevity and future career plans.

“At one of the top firms, 43 percent of the workforce has been there for less than two years. 77 percent have been there for five years or less,” Marotti told The Independent in an email.

Job security depends on earning frequent promotions and doing what’s necessary to compete, including traveling often and working 60 to 70 hours per week, Marotti said. AI is also playing a role.

“The firms themselves have cut thousands of jobs over the last couple of years as sort of client demand has shifted and AI has really started to carve out a lot of the analysis work that these junior consultants used to do,” Marotti said.

Investment banker

Investment banking offers an average salary of $127,933, according to career site Indeed.com data. Yet, it often requires employees to endure extreme pressure and long hours, according to Indeed.

“The core issue in [investment banking] is that it’s optimized for big deals and client service, not for human development or flourishing,” Margolis said. “The money is genuinely extraordinary – but for many people, the life it requires is extremely hard.”

Long advancement timelines to a high-paid managing director role also mean potentially spending many years in a lower-paying analyst role with less autonomy or direct client work, according to Margolis.

“Making [managing director] takes at least 10 years of making it in a ruthless, ‘up-or-out’ culture where the majority of analysts and associates burn out or don’t make it.”

Investment bankers at firms like JP Morgan Chase can earn good money but face burnout and long paths to promotion (Reuters)

Additionally, pay volatility makes the high salary less certain than many believe, Margolis said.

“It’s highly dependent on the market,” she said. “If you don’t bring in a big deal as a [managing director], you can have a very low-paying year.”

Roles at private equity firms offer the highest payoff, though getting there may require toughing it out for “a decade or two,” she said.

 

This entry was posted in Motivation/Sales, Uncategorized on June 14, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

CALIFORNIA’S PROPOSED WEALTH TAX IS MAKING SOME LEAVE ALTOGETHER; WHY LIVE IS A STATE THAT WANTS TO STEL YOUR WEALTH AND GIVE IT TO ILLEGAL ALIENS OTHERS PLAN STRATEGIES TO AVOID IT

Rich Californians Are Finding Creative Ways to Get Ahead of the Billionaire Tax© Alexandra Citrin-Safadi/WSJ; iStock

Veteran tax-and-estate adviser Andrew Katzenstein was in his Los Angeles home earlier this year when he got a call from the family office of a longtime client about the proposal to impose a one-time, 5% tax on the net worth of California billionaires. His client, a real-estate investor with family in the state, was loath to pull up his roots and wanted Katzenstein to work with his team to figure out its implications for him.

Sponsored

The team of six set to work valuing the investor’s private company and tallying his net worth. His client plans to pay the tax if it is implemented and he’s subject to it, Katzenstein said. In the meantime, the investor has been looking at strategies that are as “tax-efficient” as possible, like speeding up his and his wife’s charitable-giving plans.

With help from their phalanx of tax and trust-and-estate advisers, California’s ultrawealthy are getting creative in the face of the proposed billionaire tax. If it becomes law, it would tax the net worth of billionaires who resided in California as of Jan. 1 this year, based on their net worth at the end of the year.

The state has already seen a few high-profile departures. Other billionaires plan to stay put. Some are looking to lower their net worth tally to slash their potential tax bill under the proposal, or trying to escape from the wealth tax’s net entirely. Others simply want to know where they stand so they can begin preparing, if necessary.

“People take steps to take advantage of the tax law before it changes all the time. This is just another example of that,” said Katzenstein, a partner at accounting firm HCVT who is advising multiple clients on the proposed tax.

It is a high-stakes question. The 5% tax would kick in at a net worth of $1.1 billion and higher, while lower tax rates would phase in at wealth levels ranging from just over $1 billion to just under $1.1 billion.

Katzenstein’s client has given away hundreds of millions of dollars to charity with his wife over the years. The investor said that, given the choice, he would rather their money go to charities that he and his wife know do good work than to California’s government, which he doesn’t trust to use the funds effectively.

He isn’t alone. An early employee of an artificial-intelligence company who has shares that vest to the tune of $300 million this year is worried that the payout will push him into wealth-tax territory, said Jon Feldhammer, a former IRS trial attorney who now is managing partner of Baker Botts’s San Francisco office. He and his client are trying to negotiate with the company so the unvested shares can be donated to charity.

A founder of a private company is considering the delay of a funding round to put off a higher valuation for his equity stake in his company, Katzenstein said. The delay could extend until 2027, but the founder could proceed with the raise earlier if the tax is voted down.

Tax-and-estate advisers are also helping clients restructure their balance sheets to make them more tax-efficient. They are advising on the pros and cons of transferring real estate out of limited liability companies into clients’ own names or into revocable trusts. Real estate “held directly” by a taxpayer or a revocable trust isn’t included in net worth under the proposed tax because it already is subject to property taxes. Advisers are also presenting the option to clients of splurging on a vacation home that they have had in their sights and owning it outright or placing it into a revocable trust.

Related video: 11 ways the wealthy insulated themselves from the system they helped create (The Queen Zone)

The Queen Zone
11 ways the wealthy insulated themselves from the system they helped create
helped create. Automated labor replacement.

Another strategy under discussion: buying expensive assets like art or yachts located outside the state and keeping them out of California, perhaps near or in an out-of-state vacation home. (The Act excludes from net worth “tangible personal property located outside California” if it has been outside the state for at least 270 days this year, assuming it hasn’t been temporarily moved “with a substantial purpose” of tax avoidance.)

An approach that likely wouldn’t affect a person’s net-worth tally but could lower a tax bill, advisers said, is taking money from other investments and putting them into Treasurys, as federal law doesn’t allow states to tax Treasurys.

But the available suite of potential workarounds is “relatively narrow” and likely to be of most use to the slice of the ultrawealthy near the threshold at which the tax starts taking effect, said Mike Harman, a wealth adviser at J.P. Morgan Private Bank in Irvine, Calif. He and other advisers caution that any moves could trigger other, cascading tax implications.

Whether any of the strategies ultimately works will depend on the specific facts in play, said David Gamage, a professor at the University of Missouri law school who helped draft the proposed tax.

“I like to tell my students this maxim of tax-planning: Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered,” Gamage said. “You can often get away with some amount of restructuring affairs, but if you go too far and get too greedy, you can get in trouble.”

The healthcare union behind the proposed wealth tax has estimated it could raise $100 billion in revenue to offset cuts to healthcare in President Trump’s signature tax-and-spending law last year. Critics have said the tax threatens innovation and the appeal of what is already one of the highest-tax states for the wealthy.

Debru Carthan, a radiologic technician and executive with the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, said in a statement, “It’s offensive that when so many people are struggling to afford gas, groceries and life’s necessities, there’s a group of billionaires who are fixated on avoiding paying their fair share.”

Advisers said one group that may have fewer planning options is Silicon Valley founders who are billionaires on paper but have relatively little in the way of liquid net worth. That’s partly because those entrepreneurs made the money themselves, Feldhammer said.

According to Feldhammer’s reading—which some take issue with—the Act taxes net worth when a wealth creator has transferred assets to trusts himself or herself. But those provisions don’t necessarily tax wealth transferred to trusts by others—say, parents or grandparents, said Feldhammer. “This targets self-made entrepreneurs more than multigenerational wealth,” he said of the proposed tax. “You have more options if you’re not the one who contributed assets to the trust.”

Sponsored

A complication: Advisers say the proposal leaves room for interpretation, making possible challenges from California’s Franchise Tax Board in the form of audits or assessments, which could, in turn, kick off legal battles. (The board is expected to issue regulations dispelling at least some of the ambiguity if the wealth tax takes effect.)

The proposal also contains an anti-avoidance rule, meaning measures taken that reduce a tax bill need to have “economic substance,” or a material reason for being made other than avoiding taxes.

Advisers said their clients typically have significant alternative reasons to make the changes they are contemplating. Clients worried about geopolitical instability or inflation are looking to shift a portion of their wealth into safe-haven assets like Treasurys, Katzenstein said.

Jennifer Kowal, a senior income-tax strategist at San Francisco-based IEQ Capital, said giving to charity can quickly and effectively lower a client’s balance sheet. The proposal says a charitable pledge won’t reduce net worth if it was made after Oct. 15, 2025; Kowal draws a distinction between a pledge versus a gift that actually is made.

She also thinks charitable gifts generally comply with the anti-avoidance provision. “I can’t imagine the state of California saying, we’re going to trigger the anti-abuse rule because you made a large charitable donation” given that donors have many nontax reasons to give, she said, loosely referring to the anti-avoidance rule.

Similarly, Kowal said moving real estate out of limited liability companies can remove the annual financial and administrative costs that come with maintaining LLCs.

Some of her clients have joked about divorcing, as the assets of married couples count toward an individual’s net worth.

This entry was posted in Billionaires in the world on June 14, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

UFC WHITE HOUSE OCTAGON FIGHT RING GIRLS EXPLAINED…

Every Ring Girl’s Costume For UFC Freedom 250, On A Scale Of Sexy Martha Washington To 10

By: Elle Purnell
June 13, 2026
4 min read
Denise Richards in "Drop Dead Gorgeous" wearing a Mount Rushmore headdress

Image CreditWarner Bros Classics / YouTube

I’ve rated all the ring girls’ costumes for Sunday’s fight, in a feat of journalism so bold Scott Pelley might mistake it for combat.

  •  After surviving two Virginia residents — who claimed hosting a cage match on the South Lawn of the White House would cause them to personally suffer “aesthetic, dignitary, and procedural harms” — the Ultimate Fighting Championship’s Freedom 250 event will proceed as planned on Sunday. (One plaintiff

The aesthetics of the fight have been the subject of left-wing ire, with the loudest objections coming from people like Hillary Clinton, who knows a thing or two about improprieties on White House grounds. But nothing offended leftists more than the outfits UFC revealed for the “ring girls,” the women who walk around the octagon with signs announcing each successive match. Because U.S. flag code prohibits wearing an actual American flag like a beach towel, media concluded, the star-spangled getups must be against the law.

UFC dropped the outfits the Octagon Girls will be wearing at the White House this weekend 🇺🇸

— Turning Point Action (@TPAction) June 10, 2026

Created by costume designer Marina Toybina, the outfits feature everything from typical cheerleader hot pants to dramatic trains. The best ones are reminiscent of the classic American tradition of high school drill teams, which is to say, they’re fabulous.

In a feat of journalism so bold Scott Pelley might confuse it with combat, I’ve rated all 10 styles, from worst to Sexy Martha Washington to best.

2/10

These are the least interesting of the set. What’s going on with the neckline of the one on the right, and why aren’t they the same? The bustier cut is very juniors’ department, and the velvet is an odd choice for a 90-degree June day.

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram

Marie Antoinette/10

There’s a lot going on here. The embroidery, train, and corset feel like a Sexy Martha Washington Halloween costume, but maybe that’s what they were going for?

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram

5/10 and Rodeo Queen/10

The costume on the left looks like a 1950s cigarette girl, which could have worked really, really well. The silhouette is great, but the white contrast trim makes the costume look cheap. This also would have been a good opportunity to depart from the repetitive corset-style bodices.

The girl on the right looks great, if slightly like she needs a cowboy hat to complete her ensemble. The blending of patterns and textures is exactly right, as is the draped sash. But it looks like she got her earrings from Claire’s, and she’s going to spend her whole night tugging down her hemline. Some tall white boots would have helped balance out the proportions.

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram

Lynda Carter/10

These feel very retro and Wonder Woman-inspired, down to the silver cuff bracelets. Skimpy, but more sorority girl than statutory indecent exposure, which is more than can be said for the trans twerker Biden welcomed on the South Lawn.

The bright red satin is more appropriate for early summer than the dark velvet version a few entries above, and the belts are a natural nod to the occasion. Not sure why the silver trim on the blue corset top doesn’t match the red one, but I wish it did.

 

7.2/10

Similar to the other long-skirted one but more “Columbia Pictures” than colonial hottie. The gold embroidery on the blue is gorgeous, and something about it reminds me of those World War I posters where a woman representing “Victory” is decked out in stars and stripes. It’s over the top, but in the right way. But the red and white stripes visually overpower the rest of the outfit a bit — replacing the stripes with a solid red underskirt would have softened it. Extra 0.2 points for the shoulder sash.

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram

9.9/10

This looks comfortable, fun, and flattering. Definitely giving off “cheerleader,” which is appropriate for an iconic American sporting event. If the New England Patriots decided to adopt something like this for their cheer team, I wouldn’t blame them.

The sparkly boots are an upgrade from the velvet ones, but this outfit loses 0.1 point because, again, white boots would have looked better!

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram

Miss America/10

She’s beauty, she’s grace. There’s not too much going on here, and the proportions are flattering. The shoulder sash is fun and coordinates with the skirt without distracting from it. It’s somewhere between “U.S. Olympic figure skating costume” and “Andrews Sisters tribute show,” which is basically a perfect place for a Flag Day UFC ring girl costume to end up.

A missed opportunity with all of these costumes, though, is headwear. Even if they didn’t want to go full Becky Ann Leeman in Drop Dead Gorgeous, a tiara headband like this would have completed the look nicely.

Image Credit@ufc and @maximmag / Instagram
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 14, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

SULTAN OF BRUNEI OWNS THE WORLD’S LARGEST HOME? DOES HE REALLY NED THAT MUCH SPACE?

The Sultan of Brunei owns a vast collection of cars, but he’s also the owner of the largest residential palace in the world.

It’s called Istana Nurul Iman and it cost $1.4 billion to build… in 1984.

For reference, that’s equivalent to around $4.6 billion in today’s money.

But what’s truly impressive is the number of bathrooms.

The Sultan of Brunei is a real estate mogul

Obviously, most heads of state own public properties at home and private estates abroad, but the Sultan takes this to the next level.

Through the Brunei Investment Agency, the Sultan owns the Dorchester Hotel in London, the Beverly Hills Hotel in Los Angeles County, Le Meurice in Paris, Hotel Eden in Rome, and a few more.

Sponsored

It’s a nice portfolio, and the value is spectacular, although the real estate market in Europe isn’t the same as it is in the US, which means it goes up but it can also go down.

Benutzer Chtrede/Wikipedia Commons

Still, to a man worth billions of dollars, that probably doesn’t matter much.

And if all else fails, he can always go back to the majestic palace he owns back home.

The Sultan’s place is is a big as some villages and towns in Europe

In his homeland, he owns (among other things) a $1.4 billion grand palace with 1,788 rooms and 257 bathrooms.

All in all, the estate spans over 2.1 million square feet – roughly the same as the Old Town in Monaco.

Located on a riverside sprawl, the palace is situated on the banks of the Brunei River, a stone’s throw from the country’s capital Bandar Seri Begawan.

The Guinness World Records actually states the location as the largest residential palace in the world.

The interior is adorned with gold-woven carpet, and some of the fixtures feature actual diamonds.

On top of that, the Sultan had silk imported from China, and marble imported from Italy.

Benutzer Chtrede/Wikipedia Commons

In addition to the 257 bathrooms, the palace also includes a banquet hall with enough capacity for over 5,000 guests, a mosque that can hold up to 1,500 guests, 110 garages for the Sultan’s immense car collection, an air conditioned stable for the Sultan’s 200 polo horses, and five swimming pools.

The icing on the cake? It apparently includes 44 stairwells and 18 elevators.

This entry was posted in Billionaires in the world on June 13, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

CHINESE ELECTRIC CARS ARE POPULAR ALL OVER THE WORLD, EXCEPT IN CHINA!!!!

A Xiaomi SU7 Max car is displayed at the entrance to the Xiaomi EV Factory in Beijing.© greg baker/Afp/Getty Images

The world is applauding the latest Chinese vehicles and sales are surging almost everywhere the cars are available. The one exception: China itself.

New-car sales in China, the world’s largest new-vehicle market, fell 22% in May compared with the same month a year earlier to around 1.5 million vehicles. That was the eighth straight month of year-over-year declines, according to the China Passenger Car Association. Year-to-date car sales are running nearly 20% below last year, hitting profits at the country’s leading carmakers.

Sponsored

Monthly vehicle sales in China

The troubles at home are pushing Chinese carmakers—including foreign brands that manufacture there—into an even more aggressive expansion overseas. The Chinese auto industry shipped 784,000 cars abroad in May, according to the association, 75% more than in the same month last year.

In January, Beijing halved a tax exemption for plug-in vehicles and reduced subsidies when people trade in an old vehicle for an electric vehicle, hitting EV sales. Then, in March, the Iran war led to rising gasoline prices, hurting sales of traditionally powered cars as well.

Many consumers were already hesitant about big-ticket purchases in an economy hit by deflation and high youth unemployment. Retail sales in China grew just 0.2% in April, the slowest in more than three years.

“We need to do something to really rebuild consumer confidence,” said Stella Li, executive vice president at BYD, China’s largest carmaker.

How a smaller car market is squeezing all buyers, new and used
The American auto market has gone high end, making more

For the first quarter, many Chinese automakers reported their worst results in years. BYD’s net profit roughly halved to the equivalent of $590 million, its lowest since mid-2022. Smaller players, such as EV maker XPeng, are suffering losses in a market crowded with dozens of competitors and hundreds of models.

Quarterly net income

BYD has sought to revive business with technology announcements such as five-minute flash charging, long battery warranties and pledges to cover the cost of any accidents caused by its “God’s Eye” driver-assistance system.

The focus on innovation marks a change from the price cuts that drove BYD’s spectacular growth in earlier years. The Chinese government last year clamped down on what it saw as excessive competition in the EV industry, fearful that a vicious price war was hurting suppliers and contributing to the deflationary mood.

Sponsored

With its unusual automated-driving promise, BYD wants to “put money on the table, give consumers confidence,” said Li. “I’m more focused on quality than quantity.”

As the local market struggles, Chinese carmakers are accelerating their export push. BYD founder Wang Chuanfu said at the company’s annual general meeting Tuesday that it planned to be the world’s largest automaker within five years, according to a summary of the meeting.

China’s monthly vehicle exports

Among the few countries not experiencing an influx of Chinese cars is the U.S., which has introduced high tariffs and other restrictions to keep them out.

On Monday, the Pentagon added BYD and NIO, another Chinese carmaker, to a list of companies deemed to have links with China’s military, a move that bars them from carrying out work for the Defense Department. The companies said they didn’t have military links and were wrongly included on the list.

Sponsored

Elsewhere, the rapid growth of Chinese vehicle exports has raised alarm bells and prompted moves to restrict trade. China’s carmakers have responded by building factories and joint ventures, particularly in Europe.

“The key is to find a way to really partner and join forces,” said Brian Gu, XPeng’s vice chairman. “Ultimately, we need to invest more.”

 

This entry was posted in Electric Cars. EV's on June 13, 2026 by sterlingcooper.

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • ANOTHER GOVERNMENT PROJECT WASTING MILLIONS AND NOBODY IS IN JAIL!
  • SOCIALISM ALWAYS BECOMES COMMUNISM, AND IT NEVER WORKED; INVENTED BY AN UNEMPLOYED GERMAN LOSER NAMED KARL MARX
  • PRESIDENT TRUMP RELEASES HIS 2025 INCOME!!!
  • HUMANOID ROBOTS PERFORM FIRST EVER SURGERY!
  • SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM, TRUMP’S BIGGEST SUPPORTER, DIES OF A HEART ATTACK AT AGE 71

Sterling Cooper, Inc. © 2023,  Privacy Policy